@kdastgirkhan @RajaArsalanKhan Doesn't hypernationalism stem from deep-rooted internal and external insecurities?
— Amber Rahim Shamsi (@AmberRShamsi) June 10, 2013
Yes, but the sad part is that these internal and external insecurities have been drummed into most Pakistanis by our hyper-nationalist press, egged on, and its wheels oiled by, our mendacious and dishonest Deep State.
Leaving external threats aside for a while, let us just look at the “internal insecurities” and what they spring from. Mainly the terrorists of the TTP killing both civilian and soldier alike, “terminating with extreme prejudice” all those that stand in the way of their triumph, to the extent of decapitating our brave young men.
Now where in the world did these murderers spring from? Are those of us who say they are a direct effect of the US assault on Kabul/the Muslim Ummah not the greatest hypocrites on earth? Have we forgotten that the catastrophe started in 1994 when Malakand Division was taken over; followed by Orakzai in 1997 and North Waziristan in 1998 whose tribal chiefs and Maliks were slaughtered, and so-called “Islamic justice” was used to decapitate the opposition?
But leave the Pakistani version of the Taliban alone, even though the Af/Pak Taliban are joined at the hip and have said so, only we don’t choose to pull our heads out of the sand. Let us just look at the Haqqanis and their apparent cosiness with our Deep State which is given as a reason for Pakistan not acting against them as they attack our “allies”, the Americans, in Afghanistan.
The Deep State’s movers and shakers tell us through their henchmen that the Haqqani’s are being molly-coddled, so that when the Taliban take over in parts of Afghanistan after the Americans leave in 2014, they will be our “friends” in the new dispensation. One has written this ad nauseum along with examples from recent history that this notion of “strategic depth” is cretinism of the worst kind.
Whenever it came to Afghan national interests, the Haqqanis have been Afghans first and our friends later (which is just as it ought to be with self-respecting nations) — the only nation in the whole wide world which will hurt its own interests in the pursuit of some nonsense such as the non-existent Ummah; or indeed to prove ourselves as the thekedars, aka maamas, of our common religion. As an aside, what could be more ludicrous than YouTube being available all across the Gulf States and not in the Land of the Pure?
But back to the Haqqanis ... we will never learn. Back in January 2010, I wrote in Dawn: “Case in point: the absolute and repeated refusal of even the Taliban government when it was misruling Afghanistan, to accept the Durand Line as the international border between Pakistan and Afghanistan, despite the fact that it was a surrogate of Pakistan — propped into power; paid for; and helped militarily, diplomatically and politically by the Pakistani government and its ‘agencies’.
“Indeed, it even refused the Commando’s interior minister, the loudmouth General Moinuddin Haider when he went to Kabul to ask for the extradition of Pakistani criminals being sheltered by the Taliban. We must remember that the Commando was pressing the Foreign Office till just a few days before 9/11 to have the Taliban regime’ recognised by more countries!
“This poppycock of ‘strategic depth’ can only be explained by our great military thinkers and strategists and geniuses: it is not for mortals like yours truly to make sense of any of it. Particularly because this nonsense can only happen after the Americans depart from Afghanistan.
“Why this subject at this time, you might well ask. Well I have just been reading David Sanger’s The Inheritance in which he meticulously lays out the reasons why he believes the Pakistani ‘dual policy’ towards the Taliban exists.
“On page 247 he states that when Michael McConnell, the then chief of US National Intelligence went to Pakistan in late May 2008, he heard Pakistani officers make the case for the Pakistani need for having a friendly government in Kabul after the Americans departed.”
So there you have it, friends, “internal security concerns”. Before leaving you for a brief remembrance of a departed friend, let me ask the warriors/ees of the PTI to please go to Google and see just how many Carrier Battle Groups the big bad Americans have in the Arabian Sea. We will talk about shooting down US drones next week.
Late last night, old pal JR tweeted the sad demise of senior friend Chaudhry Zaheer Ahmad, in Karachi. Even though Zaheer had long been known to my cousin Anis Shah, I met him in Quetta in 1973 if memory serves, when he came seeking refuge with friend Minoo Marker as ZAB cracked down on the newspaper The Sun of which Zaheer was a shareholder.
The Sun could be compared with Private Eye of yesteryear, when all caution was thrown to the winds and most provocative stuff written. Anyway Minoo thought the safest place would be his, what he called The Mythical Marble Mines, out in the desert near Alam Reg rail station and from where Koh-e-Taftaan could be seen. So, all three of us piled into Minoo’s green 4-door Jeep Wagoneer and off we went.
Beautiful cool nights, right under the flight-path of East-West air traffic and while we could not hear them, the lights could be seen among a million, billion stars. One only had to be careful of the sidewinder vipers that infested the area but which were clearly seen in the light of torches, their diamond eyes blazing away. RIP Chaudhry Sahib, one of the brightest people I have ever known.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 14th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (31)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Lala Gee: * >>So please explain what Pakistan should have done instead to have at least one side of the border free of threats*
Regardless whether Pakistan had another choice or not, whatever she did, not only did NOT solve the original problem but also created the bigger current problem.
KS always pens the truth which is difficult to be swallow by those who are putting their blinkers on for several decades and following the self-destructive policies of strategic depth and exporting terror, which like scud missiles have veered off its course and hit Pakistan itself.
What hurts most is the betrayal by the army who favoured the foreign Haqqanis over our own fierce anti-Taliban Turi tribe, back-stabbed and sabotaged them from delivering a decisive blow against the militant extremists that had mercilessly murdered hundreds of their and our people, i.e. Pakistani citizens. What does it say about our ideological sympathies and religious nationalist lunacy?
Pakistan army blockades anti-Taliban tribe in Kurram
I think Moinuddin Haider will forever be immortalized in the movie 'A Mighty Heart', in that scene that exposed the deranged defensive right-wing Pakistani mindset, when confronted to act on Daniel Pearl's disappearance, instead dismissed it and claimed it was a conspiracy by India to bad name Pak, but as all know, we would later on find out that he was murdered by a former patriotic asset.
Musharraf claims we're not 'mad men'. Clearly we are...
@Razi: In a separate OpEd you said "The Indians here will never change". Today you say "Kamran Shafi just cannot change".
It looks like the only thing that is not changing is the quality and content of your comments.
@Razi:
A. The Indians here will never change.
B. Kamran Shafi just cannot change.
OK.
First the Indians.
And now KS.
Must be very exasperating for a change master like you.
Err... What all have you changed and how often?
Kamran Shafi just cannot change.
My understanding of the concept of ' strategic depth ' is to have a safe fall back position to go to and operate from in case the need arose. So, in fact Pakistan has provided ' strategic depth ' to the Afghan Taliban amongst others, instead of the other way around...........and I doubt very much the other way around would have ever arisen or be allowed. After reading your opinion piece one is forced to wonder as to what extent are we willing to go, in order to justify the unjustifiable.
I think the main goal of establishment in Pakistan is neither installation of a puppet regime in Kabul nor keeping Soviets (or nowadays India) at bay, rather it is keeping Afghanistan State weak. For anybody who is well versed in history of the region, it is quite clear that a stable and self reliant Afghan State will be problematic for Pakistani establishment to deal with. A divided Afghanistan, engaged in Civil War is best from the point of view of external security of Pakistan's Western Frontier.
However, since nothing comes for free, Pakistan will pay dear for this strategem. A weak and perpetually turmoiled Afghanistan will continue to feed Internal security problems for Pakistan ranging from further extremism, refugee influx to weapon and drugs proliferation. Only time will tell, whether this barter of Internal Security for External security is worth it.
KS was so much more convincing when he used to write about "gunda nallas" in Kalar Kahar.
@Lala Gee: There is flaw in your interpretation that entry of Afghanistan by Russia was good for India. I think Pakistan and India were next in line to connect with China. Imagine for a minute Communist governments in Russian empire, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and China. More than half the humanity would have been under communism and a great threat to Capitalism. Back to the topic-Strategic depth is nothing but repentance by the army for loss of land in 1971. If Army could gain land mass in Afghanistan equivalent to that lost in 1971 it would mean that history will forgive them for loss and do not forget more plots for the defense personnel, journalist and senior bureaucrats.
More like a page of personal dairy than an OpEd. Nothing useful or sensible.
@Lala Gee:
Author or anybody please explain to me what is this concept of “Strategic Depth”? I have no idea what this is
Since you are such a babe in the woods, I just have to help you. Just go through Chapter 3 of the following link.
http://www.diis.dk/graphics/publications/reports2011/rp2011-08-pakistans-future-policy_web.pdf
I have quoted some relevant portion below
Pakistan’s strategic depth in Afghanistan entails ‘sanitising’ the latter of any outside influence, in particular that of India. Its history is therefore pockmarked with extensive engagement and interference in internal Afghan affairs. Such a strategy of forestalling hostile encirclement has undermined both Afghanistan’s internal security as well as that of the region. Whether Pakistan will alter the course of this trend will therefore help determine the future of security in the area.
This article accurately reflects the thinking that underlies the historic behavior of the rulers of "Takht Lahore" for whom every thing beyond the Indus river is simply foreign territory inhabited by less civilized people who have to be controlled by guns, missiles and rockets only. Every one on the western side of Indus is an enemy. Period. It is not too different from the attitude that wast maintained towards the people who inhabited East Pakistan; they were also less civilized and were to be ruled for their own benefit. Any aspirations that these people have is immaterial because they are simply not loyal to the "Takht Lahore" and consequently to Pakistan. Hence the author and many others who follow his line of thinking want us to take over the American war and engage in it, loyally and faithfully. That it will bring ruin to us because of the conflict that will ensue and will simply not come to an end for generations, is none of their concern. One wonders about author's lack of knowledge of the history of these parts for the past at least a thousand years. Let me try to remind him of the situation that had prevailed on this border for nearly 100 years when Pakistan was created. It took Jinnah's wisdom to bring the war in these areas to an end without firing a single shot and without having any significant armed presence in these areas. It remained peaceful till that great liberator of the mankind - the surkh sawera - invaded and tried to colonize Afghanistan. But for Jinnah - not beholden to the traditions of takht Lahore - we would still be fighting the British wars of conquest. May be we can learn from history ...
We always prefer jingoistic approach over the rational and secularistic approach
Pakistan needs more brave and honest people like Kamran Shafi, Hassan Nisar, Nadeem Paracha and Najam Sethi to show Pakistanis the mirror and steer them in the right direction.
Hyper nationalism combined with religious zeal is a perfect mirage set up by the establishment to rule the ignorant masses and to suppress ethnic nationalism. The ruling elite keeps getting rich off the fat of the land while the powerless and unquestioning masses are led to their altars in the name of the Ummah and jihad. A toxic recipe concocted by some insecure and paranoid types sitting in the chambers or power corridors.
"Strategic Depth" was not just in theory only. Pakistan has actually put this theory to use. Indian Airlines plane was hijacked from Kathmandu and taken to Kandahar. It eventually freed three terrorists. These terrorists returned to Pakistan and were given rousing welcome. One went to form Jaish-e-Muhammad and another was involved in killing of Daniel Pearl.
Kudos to KS Sahib and thanks to ET for printing quality Op Ed. I agree with the Op Ed 100%.
@Lala Gee: Lala Gee, bulls eye. Well said.
@Lala Gee: It is incorrect to say that Pakistan interfered in Afghanistan only after 1979. The interference dates back at least to Bhutto's time. Also USSR had withdrawn in 1991. There was no need to continue involvement in their internal affairs or fund train and arm Afghan Taliban and install them in 1996.
@Lala Gee: Lala Gee, there are other fools, much senior, but lacking elementary common sense.
@Lala Gee:
I am sorry to say this, as you usually come out as someone who knowledgeable - please junk the books you have been reading and websites you have checking. You need new sources of knowledge and a less paranoid mind set. Regards
@Lala Gee:
What complexities of "dirty international geopolitics" that you are referring to which leads to you to call Kamran Shafi a fool who is commenting "on such issues like a genius"? So far we have dug ourselves a huge hole regardless of who has been in power.
Another Kamran Shafi article targeting the establishment, it really is getting old now, not for the reason that there's something wrong with writing about a particular subject repeatedly but it becomes pointless when your criticism is so blatantly biased and not constructive.
Anyway, Mr Shafi, let me make you aware of the implications of the suggestion you are making. From what I understand, we should cut off all connections to the Afghan Taliban and not think of any sort of strategic depth in Afghanistan. Its all just not worth it because you think the Haqqanis, who will eventually be in power will put their interest first.
Just consider what would happen if we took action against these people. I am sure that you agree that the Afghan Taliban will come in to power eventually. When these guys are in power and have thousands of armed men at their disposal, do you not think that they are more likely to create more of a problem for us in the future when we kick them while their on the ground now? The border with Afghanistan will be a million times worse than it is now.
Ill leave that for your ''genius'' mind to think about. Hopefully your favorite, now Prime Minister, thinks his thoughts true a bit more than you.
@lalai: ".....but our embassy was burnt to ashes twice in Kabul by same elements whom we provided shelter and everything else in the name of Muslim ummah." . It is just not Kabul. In every Ummati country you are kept at a distance. Basically it remains a one-side love affair. The idea of Ummat was sold to us by Iqbal, thus becoming an integral part of the grand delusion we suffer from. In fact anyone expressing even a slightest bit of doubt would be committing blasphemy. . Unless the people are made to realise that they are chasing a chimera, the establishment would continue using this card, due to not having a well defined national identity, lack of confidence abounds.
@author & lalai the deep state is not doing all that out of love for the ummah but out of greed for controlling Afghanistan with its access to central asia. And everbody knows how clever they are.
"“This poppycock of ‘strategic depth’ can only be explained by our great military thinkers and strategists and geniuses: it is not for mortals like yours truly to make sense of any of it. Particularly because this nonsense can only happen after the Americans depart from Afghanistan."
Author or anybody please explain to me what is this concept of "Strategic Depth"? I have no idea what this is and where this idea is mentioned in Pak-Army policy guidelines manual. What I know is, Pakistan only intervened in Afghanistan, despite Afghan government's persistent involvement in promoting terrorist and separatist activities in Pakistan since our independence, when the USSR entered in Afghanistan. This move posed a real existential threat to Pakistan as on Eastern side there was already a 6 times bigger enemy with hostile posturing, and now her allied superpower came sitting on our western borders. Any country in place of Pakistan would have tried to get rid the pending danger. Important point to note: Pakistan still did not have any nuclear deterrent, while both, USSR and India had the world's largest pile of nuclear arsenal. So please explain what Pakistan should have done instead to have at least one side of the border free of threats.
We are idiots!
@lalai:
"it is said that fools learn from their mistakes."
Fools also don't understand the complexities of dirty international geopolitics, but still chose to comment on such issues like a genius.
Hassan Nisar can answer that question.......
it is said that fools learn from their mistakes. But we don't even qualify for fool. Now it is the fact that we have fought four wars with India, but our embassy was burnt to ashes twice in Kabul by same elements whom we provided shelter and everything else in the name of Muslim ummah.