The answer to that question is already weaved into the stories we tell others — and ourselves — about Pakistan. We tell our children that Pakistan was once considered an economic role model and Karachi was a city full of lights and life, before our incompetence led to squandering many opportunities to give Pakistan a better future. We tell our children that the British left us an extensive rail network and instead of building and expanding that network, we looted and plundered our own resources. We tell our children that Pakistan previously had an abundant supply of gas as a natural resource and today, we struggle to supply enough gas for the residents of our capital city to cook dinner. In other words, we tell our children an overpowering tale of Pakistan’s impotence. It’s no surprise then that when it comes to results, we receive exactly what we expect from Pakistan: an inability to deliver when and where it matters.
This leads to a very revealing insight: the stories we tell ourselves about Pakistan don’t just define our past, they also shape our future. If we can change the existing narrative around Pakistan, we could influence our future in a meaningful way. Let’s begin this process by asking, beyond impotence, does Pakistan have a story worth telling?
Pakistan does have a gripping narrative beyond the tales of its monumental impotence, but it doesn’t have storytellers that can celebrate the country, without being branded as ‘apologists’. Yes, Pakistan’s problems are real and significant. But so are Pakistan’s achievements, which are overlooked by the country’s storytellers.
Every now and then, a storyteller breaks onto the national stage and changes the way we look at ourselves. Recently, it was the promise of a Naya Pakistan that electrified the nation. It wasn’t a specific policy proposal that inspired the nation. It was the promise of a new narrative about Pakistan that encouraged a tsunami of young and first-time voters to show up at polling stations around the country. Without changing anything on the ground, one gifted storyteller managed to lift the national mood by promising a new narrative around Pakistan. This is a vivid example of the power of storytelling and how it can influence outcomes in the real world.
The power of storytelling can be used to influence the destiny of a nation. By being more strategic about the stories we choose to tell about Pakistan, we can reimagine the future of the country. We can transform Pakistan’s story not by eliminating negative stories currently etched onto our national narrative but by introducing more positive stories to balance our national conversation. This will automatically transform the meaning of the negative stories currently populating our national narrative. Ultimately, how we interpret reality will matter more than reality itself.
In many ways, Pakistan is like the family that avoids going to expensive restaurants and stores because we’re certain that our children will break something — even if they aren’t as mischievous as we imagine them to be. We’re a nation that settles for less because we believe we can’t achieve more. This vicious cycle can and should be broken by the new government.
As a reality check, it’s important to note that post-modernist buzzwords like ‘storytelling’ and ‘positive thinking’ can’t solve Pakistan’s real problems by themselves. But they can significantly enhance our capacity to solve problems by empowering us with genuine confidence in our approach to challenges. In fact, Pakistan could turn its biggest weakness into a strength by using its crippling impotence as a starting point for a great turnaround story. After all, behind every great nation, there is always a great turnaround story.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 6th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Yasin: This no doubt was a terrorist act in the 21st century! I would not get provoked by Indian bloggers on historical events; they have 'Angst' in their Psyche from the historical events which causes distrust, a paranoia and eventualy affects the automatic machanism of the Brain.
People suffering from this phenomina take irrational decsions, such as the occupaton of Kashmir by India and the US administration, the congress and the judicial courts, implementing a massivd surveillanc program on millions of their own citizens riding roughshed on citizens freedom under the so called 'patriot' act. Stay calm is th best advice..
Rex Mnor
US CENTCOM , is wasting money on Abdul Quddus. As a US tax payer , I object.
ET Mods: If you can allow a post from Yasin glorifying murder, you should be able to allow my rebuttal.
@Yasin: The fact that you consider the 10 killers who killed non combatant women and children as 'innocent' and their murderous frenzy as something to be proud of is disgusting. It is people like you who do more to discredit Islam with your distorted notions of wht it means to be a true Muslim than any kaffir possibly could.
Oh whenever there is an elemet of surprise there will be issues. In a real war though, Pakistan's army has never won - no not even in 1965 no matter what your Pakistan studies teach you.
@Dee Cee: Very sane and level headed comment.
@Yasin: So, from that point of view, you'll also tell great morale boosting stories of the suicide bombers who single-handedly have killed scores of Pakistanis including big name leaders!
@Yasin:
It is this half baked thinking that is fed into your thinking by school, college sociaty that has gone int oyour psyche..... its growing fro ma deep sense of insecurity that you find excuses in these outlying incidents.. Imagine the harm done by these 10 folks ot the economy of pakistan, killing mulittude in drones and the long term picture for Pakistanis....
A green passport is a passport to terror.....
Pakistan has always won short term.. so is the thinking of hte generals and mullahs.....
be in kargil or 1965 or 1972..... yon won in battle.... India scored a bigger victory in overall war.... wiht KArgil, you killed yoru Kashmir credibility..... plus iwht 25 years passing, a generation of new thinkers are growign in establishments across other coutnries in dipomacy... be i t china or US or other countries...... they are fed only terro stories from Pakistan.....
Your narrative will be good for short term.. .like a shot of adrenaline.... but wil make you weak..... after yo uexperience it...
@Yasin: "Just imagine, just 10 boys striking terror into the heart of 1.2 billion people." Barbarians often have one edge over the civilized–they have less or nothing to lose. Misguided individuals can terrorize hotel guests easily, but, as you remember from history, professional armies often surrender in front of armies representing those terrorized people. Nuisance and strength are not the same, and I really wish Pakistan becomes a strong country and not a nuisance. Also, I hope, and I'm confident, that Pakistan as a country does not take as much pride in "striking terror" as your statement shows.
@Arindam
There is one story often missed because of political correctness is the 26/11 Mumbai. Imagine 10 young adventurers full of innocence, as pure as white lily with resources next to nothing but full of belief undertook an epic voyage on the Arabian Sea from the port of Karachi. In less than 3 days they shook the world by taking on a country that boasts of being world's third largest army as well the third largest economy. They held 1.2 billion people as ransom, which were paralysed for 72 hours not knowing what to do, how to react and kept watching TV until the boys on their own volition took the flight to heaven. Just imagine, just 10 boys striking terror into the heart of 1.2 billion people. The success of Bin Qasim, Ghaznavi, Nadir Shah pale in comparison.
Pakistan is suspected by the International community as being the prime sponsor of global terror, thru its non state sponsored actors and jihadists. No one trusts Pakistan, and 65 years of such an image is rather tough for International community, to change opinions in a hurry. Pakistan is considered a rogue state, an international migraine and one that is failing and has a nuke arsenal. How can this image change ? Rather tough. Just like Iran and North Korea , or Libya, Iran, Somalia are not going to have improved images ever. Yes, if Pakistan openly renounces terror, gives up its nukes, down sizes its armed forces, completely comes clean on terror camps, and stops being two clever by half, it might get back as a responsible state in another 50 years.
After a humiliating defeat in Vietnam, the 1979 movie Rambo, changed the way America thought about its armed forces and within 10 years broke down the Iron curtain.
I could not agree more with Bilal
Try implementing Sharia throughout Pakistan and hope for a 7th Century islamic bliss, how is that for a narrative?
I agree. The story of India too was similar. Till '90s it was all negative or based on nostalgia of pre-colonial glory or glory of ancient India and hence of no real relevance to the present or future. But things changed in the '90s with the global success of Indian IT industry and success of Indian's in Silicon Valley. Then there was a spring in the step of many young Indians. Feel good stories started coming out in international press etc and self belief increased without reference to the hoary past. I have met brilliant and successful Pakistanis in my visits to Silicon Valley. If the internal security situation in Pakistan is fixed and if the divorced couple (India-Pakistan) can be "good friends" who have moved on without references to the harrowing experience and "root causes" of divorce itself, then I don't see who can hold back Pakistan "emerge" and along with it in a different sense India too..... cheers SK Mumbai
"Ultimately, how we interpret reality will matter more than reality itself."
'Nuff said!!!
I heard this joke a few years ago. Musharraf called George Bush and said, "look. we have nothing to do with the world trade center." Bush: "What about the world trade center?" Musharraf: "Oh, what's the time in America right now?"
The point is, yes, anytime anything bad happens in the world, the 1st culprit that comes in mind is Pakistan which is so unfortunate. But once you get labeled, it is hard to shake it off.
Pakistan is a nation that has just transcended from one democratic government to another. No one can deny that Pakistan is an important country in the region, but has its challenges as well. We feel the biggest challenge faced by the nation today is terrorism. The United States has been working with Pakistan on variety of issues, including terrorism. The primary focus of the U.S. civilian-assistance program is to develop a stable, secure and tolerant Pakistan with a vibrant economy. USAID has focused its program over the last year on five areas essential to Pakistan’s stability and long-term development, and reflective of Pakistani priorities: energy, economic growth, stabilization, education and health. Over the last year, USAID has streamlined the number of projects and has also chosen to implement over half of all funding through local organizations in Pakistan – both government and non-government. Supporting the civilian government’s capacity to meet the needs of its citizens is a vital element of USAID’s program, as is working with non-governmental organizations and the private sector.
We wish the Pakistani Nation and its new government well as they start a new era.
Abdul Quddus DET-United States Central Command
The writer wasted his degree from Columbia University if that's the best he has got to say.
So you need more concocted stories - like those of invaders and plunderers like Ghaznavi and Ghori projected as heroes - the whole world has a good laugh on this point alone !!!
Is the author of this Op Ed living in a fantasy? What has stopped the writer to use his stories and power of storytelling to uplift the plight of Pakistani citizens? Pakistani masses problem is they are the victims of terrorism, hunger, diseases, poverty, ignorance, shortage of basic necessities and they do not need stories but the real facilities to live.
the problem is that Pakistani media is teeming with the prophets of doom and use 90% space to highlight 10% negatives. here Indian media is different.... it gives 10%space to 90% negatives... and as as such make the people with a sense of feel good.... and the pdople feeling good can change the course of a nation.Pakistan media has to learn from ours. it's always good to tell the truth but logic behind it should be to correct the wrongs and not to make the the nation a laughing stock for others. in India acid throwing on females is routine but it never gets coverage for international audience but such cases in Pakistan are highlighted through articles and editorials for international audience... result is their for all to see.both the nations have common evils in their respective societies...poverty... crime against woman... corruption but Pakistan is ridiculed across the globe and India is respected. Think over it.
No amount of tall tales or fabulous stories about the land of pure and its inhabitants will fool the rest of the world. The grim hard facts are too obvious and glaring to wish away!
I would request ET to publish sensible / reasonable analysis and articles. Thank you!
I couldnt agree with you more. The individual pakistanis I meet are always extremely negative abuot their country. And all leaders are seen as either white or black - In this scenario - they refuse to see any good in zardari or refuse to concede that nawaz sharif has his plus points and they will nurse scarily unrealistic hopes of Imran.