An American newspaper reported that the three leaders had also met late Saturday night, lending credence to speculation that something was happening behind closed doors.
According to an official handout issued by the president’s spokesperson, in the 90-minute meeting the leaders “resolved to defend and protect the democratic process and to resolve all issues in accordance with the Constitution”.
Intriguingly, Presidential spokesperson Farhatullah Babar opted to use the mailing account of the PPP chairperson’s media office instead of that of the president’s. There was, however, no word either from the prime minister’s media office or from the military’s public relations wing.
The statement could not be verified but subsequent activities by the government suggested that it might have received some assurance from the military.
Meanwhile, a Supreme Court official denied that the prime minister and the chief justice had met. Gilani had told a group of television anchors on Sunday that he had met Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry some days ago and intended to meet him again.
The national political scene remained calmer than expected on Monday as the government did not submit a defiant summary, nor did the court push the administration as hard as was being speculated.
There were reports throughout the past week that the government had decided to hit back if the Supreme Court continued to pressurise it to write to the Swiss government for reopening cases of graft against President Zardari. In March 2009, the military had intervened to defuse a possible government-opposition clash when a protest march was heading towards Islamabad for the restoration of the higher judiciary’s judges ousted by former president General (retd) Pervez Musharraf. Immediately after the meeting on Monday, there were signs that the same had been repeated.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 28th, 2010.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ