One great factor that must find favour with many citizens is Mr Sharif’s initial approach of rapprochement to India — one of his first statements — which was kindly received by the other side, which also is not what it was last century. This bodes well, though some express the opinion that the army does not wish him to “rush” things. So, it’s got to be all slowly, slowly, piano, piano ...
As wrote MK Bhadrakumar, the retired career diplomat and frequent sound commentator, in the Asia Times on May 14: “To be sure, the prospect of Nawaz Sharif being at the helm of affairs in Islamabad comes as great relief to the Indian leadership. Sharif is a known figure to the Indian elite and Delhi knows it can do business with him.
“In fact, things were beginning to look up in India-Pakistan relations at that point in 1999 when Sharif was ousted from power in the military coup led by General (retd) Pervez Musharraf.
“In the Indian estimation, one main reason why the military conspired against the elected government led by Sharif was the apprehension in Rawalpindi that the normalisation process with India that he was actively pursuing might gain traction.”
On May 19, our press told us that more bodies of army soldiers have been recovered from Gayari. This was a reminder that Mian Sahib did what few leaders have done and in April 2012 visited the Siachen Glacier after the unfortunate Gayari sector avalanche. Now, there are quite a few this side of the border and that side who will admit to no logic when it comes to the Indo-Pakistan stand-off in Siachen and many will condemn the fate of the soldiers of each side who live in peril or die on the Glacier.
Nawaz Sharif was a rarity in that during his glacial visit he remarked: “The Pakistani government should take the lead and withdraw its troops from the Siachen Glacier. Let’s not make it a matter of ego. Pakistan should take the initiative.” This was more than commendable. But how much backing did he have? We can, with a high degree of certainty, presume that the army was somewhat perturbed. Support came from this publication, to its great credit, editorialising on April 19 last year, ending with “Mr Sharif has rightly chosen wisdom rather than ‘national honour’ by advising a ‘unilateral’ withdrawal from Siachen. He remembers the year 1999 when his approach to India was sabotaged by ‘freedom fighters’ at Kargil. A nuclear Pakistan erred by waging a conventional war and endangered the world and was roundly condemned by all countries. Now let us earn some praise.”
Does Mian Sahib still prescribe to this viewpoint? We must hope so, though we know that the institution that pays the highest price for a cruel and pointless situation in a totally inhospitable area will naturally, for its own reasons, have its reservations. But given time and wisdom, and gentle persuasion, who knows …
Published in The Express Tribune, May 25th, 2013.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Go Zardari Go!!
The military has handled it for all these 65 years. Let the civilians try for a change.
there should be an agreed upon withdrawal not dependent on shariff's "wisdom." Shariff has always been weak when dealing with the military better to leave them alone and let them handle things unless he wants a one way flight to Saudi Arabia again.
It should not only be "Slowly, slowly …", but 'quietly, quietly..." too. Pakistanis should cut each other some slack, too!