In my assessment, I confess, I was carried away, like most of my media colleagues, by the mounting widespread impression that Imran’s tsunami was capable of stopping the PML-N’s anticipated landslide being made possible otherwise by the assured rout threatening the PPP in Punjab. The media, including the social media, reinforced this impression by the round-the-clock coverage of Imran’s whirlwind campaign throughout the length and breadth of the country, in the 20 days leading to the polling day promising a Naya Pakistan and mobilising the educated youth of the middle and upper middle classes as never before. Imran himself contributed to further strengthen this impression by exuding an exaggerated sense of personal invincibility. In the final analysis, to the consternation of Imran’s supporters, the lion proved to be neither a stuffed version nor one borrowed from circus. However, Imran’s bat seems to have succeeded in making mincemeat of the already battered and bloodied ANP in K-P. Yes, no hung parliament but the mandate, however, appears to be somewhat split if one notes the relative numerical strengths of the three major parties in the four provinces and in the all important Senate at the centre.
Now, let us turn to the PPP’s landslide in the reverse. Most of us expected the PPP to suffer the consequences of incumbency, as well as from the restrictions forced upon it by the Taliban. But its biggest drawback was the absence of a face to match Nawaz and Imran at the battlefront. And finally, when it needed a face to show at press conferences in Karachi and Lahore, they picked up, of all the people, a person whose credibility had always been down in the dumps and whom my late friend Khalid Hasan had nicknamed Inspector Clouseau. But while Clouseau was a bumbling, funny fictional police inspector in the movie The Pink Panther, Mr Rehman Malik is no fictional character, and decidedly, not a funny one. But every time he opened his mouth during his tenure as interior minister of the outgoing government, he would come up with a new fiction, no matter on what subject he was casting his pearls of wisdom — be it the law and order situation in Karachi, foreign policy, the economy, security policy or political opponents. Frequently, he would virtually double for the prime minister, and at times, even for the president.
The PPP’s seemingly intense desire to complete its five-year term, come what may, had seemed to have reduced it to the status of a handmaiden of its coalition partners. They played the PPP like a fiddle. In fact, if one went over the political crises faced by the PPP during its tenure, one would be surprised to see that most of these crises for the government were set off by the PPP’s coalition partners and not by the genuine opposition — the PML-N. Another reason for the debacle was the decision of the PPP to burden a teenaged student with the enormous responsibility of leading a 40-year-old political party. I am not saying that he does not have in him what it takes to acquire, in due course of time, the leadership qualities of his maternal grandfather and his mother. But it was too early to throw him into the deep and then start taking extra precautions to protect him from the terrorists at a time when his face, in the absence of any other, was what the PPP had needed the most.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 15th, 2013.
COMMENTS (9)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Academically if we think Punjab n balochistan rejected ppp for poor performance then why Sindh did opposite for same very poor performance??
Plus it is crystal clear that these political parties are like lands - inherited by family members irrespective of age n sex!!! While rest of leaders n workers are like kamdars n haris.
Sad but fact.
The polls were grossly rigged and the authors analysis though done in good faith is incorrect. Zero PPP, PTI and other votes in a number of polling stations where people swore to have casted a vote in favor of one party or the other should be an eye opener.
PMLN has come into power like it always does with aid of the establishment.
When 200% votes are casted at polling stations it means that someone brought the votes from outside as the presiding officer is given at max 120-150% of the registered voters. So where did they get additional papers from when we the ballot papers were being printed under army supervision?
Zardari appears to have been the cleverest businessman-politician of all. He booked profits for the full five years of his party’s rule, and then realising his party had no chance of being voted back to power, decided to save as much as possible on the poll expenses, and also ensure Bilawal remains safe to fight another day in the next elections; pragmatic in every sense. Imran on the other hand proved to be a novice that he actually is.
@Author, Sir you are wrong again. This is not a land slide for PML(N). The party has not got even half the seats. I had always figured the lack of depth in PTI as well as their inexperience at organisation. IK thinks that everybody else thinks rationally. He has done marginally better than my estimate of a maximum 24 seats. I am an individual who does not even live locally.
On Imran Khan, Nawaz Sharif the ANP you have got it right, but on the PPP you Sir have got it wrong. They have retreated by design but still kept a strangle hold on Sindh, to milk. Most probably they will recast the image of the party in the Zardari mould for which they need breathing space. All-in-all considering their disgraceful performance they have come through quite well and all the talk of the PML-N of holding them accountable can already be seen as only talk.
You were not carried away, but it is the massive rigging in both Punjab, and Karachi, that prevented Imran from a clean sweep. Ask any one who prefers to give an unbiased and balanced opinion, and he would tell you that in reality, Imran was prevented from winning by a clean sweep. This is obvious and most reflective in the post election scenario, whether you would like to admit or not.
Good on you for writing this. I hope everyone realizes now that surveys (though they have shortcomings) are certainly better indicators than jalsa turnouts, social media, and pundits. The biases in the latter three will obviously always be far greater than biases in survey samples.
On top of that they function (I think) as a broad check on rigging. I don't buy the "massive rigging" allegations by PTI supporters precisely because the Gallup survey already predicted this very outcome vis a vis PTI.
We will see in next elections what becomes of PPP. This time around they did not even try to campaign, gave up their seats in Imran's favour.