Projected result: PML-N secures most NA seats with PTI as runner up

Former ruling party PPP likely to get 30 seats.


Web Desk May 12, 2013
Former ruling party PPP likely to get 30 seats. PHOTO: APP/FILE

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) is likely to form the next federal government, with 128 National Assembly seats as per the Express News' projected results.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)  - which earlier claimed of a clean sweep - is the party likely to emerge with second highest number of votes.

Below is the table showing projected results for the NA.
















































Party



NA seats



Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz



128



Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf



31



Pakistan Peoples Party



30



Independent candidates



26



Muttahida Quami Movement



12



Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam - Fazl



10



Pakistan Muslim League – Functional



5



Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party



3



Jamaat-e-Islami



3



Others



5


COMMENTS (3)

Waleed | 10 years ago | Reply

There was rigging , Corrupt Police , and more importantly u guys are missing the most important thing or a trick by these disgusting politicians ....at the last moment millions of people standing in line for hours like me when the time came to vote my name was not in the list.....after running whole day i found out that it was too late and i had to cast my vote many kilometers away in Daska ...while i lived my whole life in sialkot cantt......this was disgusting CHEATING...........they knew they were going to loose.....so we guys never thought they had already planned massive tricks ????

Salman | 10 years ago | Reply

More impotantly what does it say about the political astuteness (or lack of) and allegiance of the average rural voter? Poll rigging and the shambolic ECP aside, it is the poor rural voter who stands to suffer most withg these inept politicians and yet they vote them in - the irony!

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ