The ANP, willingly and proudly, is paying this price. Its leadership and workers’ resolve to contest elections, despite all hazards and irreparable losses, deserves commendations from every Pakistani. This does not necessarily amount to casting one’s vote for it or condoning any alleged corruption committed by its government.
Various reasons are cited for the ominous silence of political forces when it comes to openly condemning the attacks on the ANP. Those with a mild stance on the issue seek reconciliation with those perpetrating the attacks through dialogue, while the rigid ones blatantly differentiate between terrorists and the Taliban. Fundamentally, they all revel in the comfort of not being subjected to the dreadful suicide bombings. Hence, their vibrant election campaigns are there for all to see. Visionary insight is not required to assess that the grounds of the comfort they feel in the prevailing situation lies on an unsure base. Conducting negotiations are almost as difficult as conducting war. Modalities and objectives of any negotiation between the authorities and the Taliban are disputed, which led to its earlier failures. Successful negotiations require accepting realities of each other and the futility of war and violence as policy options. Currently, this realisation is missing on the part of the Taliban.
Those who assume that their favourable relationship with the Taliban will be permanent are delusional. The Taliban believe in unrestrained violence against any entity they find unacceptable. Any political force not objecting to this strategic policy is making itself a willing victim of future terrorism.
Wisdom is believed to be the fruit of bitter experiences. The ANP has grown wiser after its experiences with the Taliban. Despite much national and international disapproval, the ANP government conceded to the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation in 2009, which was conditioned to the Taliban quitting militancy and respecting Pakistan’s Constitution. However, Sufi Muhammad denounced the Constitution, burying every hope of actualising peace.
The ANP’s resolve to remain steadfast against the Taliban’s ferocity could be gauged from their slogan, watan ya kafan. Though oversimplified, this zeal seems to have an anthropological explanation. The Pashtun code of conduct is centered on the principle of pashtanna, signifying permission or consultation. As a nation, the Pashtuns refuse to be coerced and prefer being asked for permission and being persuaded through consultations on all matters pertaining to them. Representing this ideal, the ANP is communicating a resounding message on behalf of every free man in this country, to the Taliban that they can choose to intimidate us, but we only allow ourselves to be persuaded.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 7th, 2013.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Badshah Khan has discovered by practical experience that love can create more in a second than the atom bombs can destroy in centuries; that the kindest strength is the greatest strength; that the only way to be brave is to be right; that a clean dream is dearer than life and the soft eyes of your children. These are the things he taught...
Ghani Khan (1948), The Pathans
ANP is currently run by Hoti family of Mardan. It has nothing to do with ideals of Ghafar Khan. I think there is no need prove corruption
a sincere piece to hilight the clear and bold stance of anp against extremism. I want to make one observation. almost every writer when talking about AnP' resistence to extremisim, makes a passing reference to corruption. so far I have not seen or read about any big corruption scandel, charged and proved by NAB or courts. Mostly the evidence is anectodal, based on stories. even that so-called report of transparency was based on opinion, for which the survey was conducted (for some strange reasons) mostly in hazara. at that time, sentiments were against anp due to renaming of province. hence the survey lacked credibility.
The Op Ed clearly states Taliban’s message “It dictates to all democratic forces that if democracy means belief in man’s eternal right to choose, then your choice must be subjected to our will, or you will have to pay the price through your life.” There are only two forces in the country the tyrant TTP on one side and their victims on the receiving end. Those close to TTP and their mentors are safe and busy in election politics and making plans to power on the backs of TTP, while the liberal opponents are busy picking up the bodies of terror victims. Under this constant mayhem and carnage the neutral EC, SC, caretaker govt and army chief all claiming the fairness and peaceful nature of elections! The silent majority of the voters have to decide where do they belong, on the side of TTP and their favorite leaders or their victims? We have become so insensitive that just today more than a dozen people have been blatantly butchered by Taliban but the main news is the fall of a rightwing leader by mistake!