Governments and their various institutions tend to use precisely such phrases (others include “in the national interest” and so on) when they want to be economical with the truth. In this case, the amount was not even a relatively small one and hence the greater cause for worry, given the manner in which the senior bureaucrat who disclosed its transfer refused to dwell on it further. A key question that one hopes answers will be found for is that what exactly did the government give up in order to divert the money to the ISI? Given our past and present experience, it is quite likely that this meant a cut in social sector spending. The reason is that usually when budgeted allocations have been reduced to finance increases elsewhere, spending on social sector development is usually the first one to be reduced. Having said that, it is good that a body of the parliament is at least trying to unearth such instances connected to the military and the intelligence services since in the past these were considered holy cows.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 26th, 2010.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ