Hotmail is dead as Outlook.com takes over

The transition began in February, when Microsoft began a test of moving users to the new Outlook.com services.


Afp May 03, 2013
"We're excited to announce that we've completed upgrading all Hotmail customers to Outlook.com," says Microsoft's Dick Craddock. PHOTO: adelaidenow.com.au

SAN FRANCISCO: Microsoft's Hotmail, the free webmail service used by hundreds of millions of people around the world, was phased out Friday, as the US tech giant completed a rebranding to Outlook.com.

"We're excited to announce that we've completed upgrading all Hotmail customers to Outlook.com," Microsoft's Dick Craddock said in a blog post late Thursday.

"Coupled with the growing organic excitement for Outlook.com, this has pushed us to over 400 million active Outlook.com accounts."

The transition began in February, when Microsoft began a test of moving users to the new Outlook.com services.

"Hotmail was still one of the most widely used services, with over 300 million active accounts," Craddock said.

"This made the magnitude of the process incredible, maybe even unprecedented. This meant communicating with hundreds of millions of people, upgrading all their mailboxes -- equaling more than 150 million gigabytes of data -- and making sure that every person's mail, calendar, contacts, folders and personal preferences were preserved in the upgrade."

Outlook.com addresses will be better synched to other Microsoft services, such as its Bing search engine and Skydrive, the cloud storage system.

COMMENTS (7)

G. Din | 11 years ago | Reply

@INDIAN SHIA: "Even though i do use n like outlook. I am sad for hotmail bcZ it is owned bt INDIAN." Although Hotmail was programmed by an Indian, he sold it to Microsoft long back. He did not own it for a long time.

INDIAN SHIA | 11 years ago | Reply

Even though i do use n like outlook. I am sad for hotmail bcZ it is owned bt INDIAN.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ