Security situation in the country bleak: CJ

Chief justice issues directives to provide security to contesting candidates and voters on Election Day.


Our Correspondent May 01, 2013
Supreme Court. PHOTO: EXPRESS/FILE

ISLAMABAD:


The Supreme Court has expressed grave concern over the recent spate of bomb attacks during the ongoing election campaign and issued directives to the concerned authorities to ensure free and fair elections in the country.

Resuming the hearing of the election reforms implementation case on Tuesday, a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry issued directives to all provincial chief secretaries and police chiefs to provide security to contesting candidates and voters on Election Day.


Appearing on behalf of the petitioner, advocate Bilal Minto urged the court to direct the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to bar contesting candidates from establishing their camps near polling stations. The chief justice responded that at this stage the court did not want to issue any direction to the election commission in order to avoid any impact on the electoral process.

Justice Iftikhar noted that while political parties in Punjab were comparatively safe, the security situation in the rest of the country was bleak. He said that the law and order situation in Karachi was deteriorating rapidly and required immediate and concrete steps to ensure security.

The counsel for the election commission assured the bench that all possible steps to provide a peaceful environment during elections would be ensured. Later, the hearing of the case was adjourned for two weeks.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 1st, 2013. 

COMMENTS (2)

A J Khan | 11 years ago | Reply

Judiciary should share the blame. When it comes to punishing terrorists, the Lawyers and judges give all the benefit of doubt to the terrorists and are too quick to induct them back in the society. Terrorists have developed a strong network in the Judicial System of Pakistan. Some of very professional Lawyers and their sympathizer Judges make it convenient for terrorists to commit crime and get at large due to technicalities of law. Lal Masjid action was a watershed case between those who saw the activities of terrorists as unacceptable and those who supported such activities. Regrettably the Court decided in favor of terrorists, approved taking up arms against the state and ignored the Shaheeds of Pakistan Army. Much to the heart break of the Shaheeds, deplorably the court directed to pay the terrorists. Same had been the attitude of Judiciary in all other cases when it came to save terrorists

Baby ka Husband | 11 years ago | Reply

Does the CJ and the ECP bear any responsibility for the deteriorating situation?? Or is the CJ there only to pontificate??

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ