Bomb blast in Quetta injures 13

Blast victims shifted to a nearby hospital for treatment.


Afp/web Desk April 24, 2013
A screengrab shows a police official taking down information from eyewitnesses at the hospital in Quetta. SCREENGRAB: EXPRESS NEWS

QUETTA: At least 13 people were injured in a bomb blast near a hospital in the Satellite Town of Quetta, reported Express News on Wednesday.

The blast victims were shifted to a nearby hospital for treatment.

Police reached the hospital to gather information from the injured to help with the investigation.

Senior police official Fayaz Sumbal said the target of the attack was not yet clear as the injured were mainly bystanders.

There was also no immediate claim of responsibility.

On April 23, Quetta became the target for four similar blasts injuring and taking the lives of many. The first blast was reported in Jinnah Town, the second one in the Gawalmandi area and the third blast in Mali Bagh. The fourth blast which took place on Pir Mohammad Road was followed by heavy firing.

Sixth blast

Another blast was reported on Saryab road in Quetta, making it the sixth blast to take place in the last 14 hours.

One car was damaged due to the intensity of the blast.

There were no reports of injuries or casualties.
https://vimeo.com/64709959

 

COMMENTS (2)

Handover Now | 10 years ago | Reply

Handover Balochistan,Karachi and other sensitive places to army till elections because caretaker government failed to maintain peace in country also free hand should be given to army to follow and crush terrorists all over the country.Police cant trusted due to inability and presence of black sheeps in police.If primary force which is police incapable to fight terrorists and lack of advance weapons and equipment then how can they bring peace?.Its better to handover all security related matter to army.

Stranger | 10 years ago | Reply

Birth pangs of a new Balouchistan I suppose.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ