US Secretary of State John Kerry will host talks between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and senior Pakistan officials in Brussels on Wednesday, with the aim of calming tension over border disputes and the stalled peace process.
"If we are to ensure long-term peace and stability in Afghanistan we also need a positive engagement of Afghanistan's neighbours, including Pakistan," NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters as alliance foreign ministers met in Brussels to discuss NATO's mission in Afghanistan.
Wednesday's US-chaired meeting is part of a series of on-off discussions between Afghanistan and Pakistan at the behest of the United States. Rasmussen said he would meet Karzai later on Tuesday.
Afghanistan has grown increasingly frustrated with Pakistan over efforts to pursue a peace process involving the Taliban, suggesting that Islamabad is intent on keep Afghanistan unstable until after foreign combat forces have left at the end of 2014.
US officials hope that Kerry, who has a good relationship with Karzai, can bring the parties back to the negotiating table and make constructive progress on an issue that has long-term security implications for Washington.
Kerry said on Monday the aim of the meeting would be to "try to talk about how we can advance this process in the simplest, most cooperative and most cogent way, so that we wind up with both Pakistan's and Afghanistan's interests being satisfied, but, most importantly, with a stable and peaceful Afghanistan."
Tension
The talks follow weeks of tension with Pakistan over their 2,600 km (1,600 mile) border and stalled peace efforts.
Although there have been several meetings in Western capitals over the past few months in which representatives of the Taliban have met Afghan peace negotiators, there have been no signs of a breakthrough.
Kabul accuses Pakistan of harbouring the Taliban leadership in the city of Quetta and using militants as proxies to counter the influence of India in Afghanistan.
As well as Karzai and Kerry, Wednesday's meeting will include Afghanistan's defence minister, Bismillah Khan Mohammadi, Pakistan's army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, and Pakistan's foreign secretary, Jalil Jilani, the US official said.
NATO-led forces are expected to cede the lead role for security in Afghanistan this spring to Afghan soldiers, 12 years after the United States invaded Afghanistan to oust the Taliban government harbouring Osama bin Laden, the al Qaeda leader who masterminded the September 11, 2001 attacks on US cities.
Most foreign combat forces are due to pull out by the end of 2014, leaving a smaller NATO-led training mission behind and a US force to fight militants.
The White House has yet to decide how many US troops will remain in Afghanistan after 2014 and this could be a factor influencing both Taliban and Pakistani strategy. Much depends on progress in negotiations with Karzai on a Bilateral Security Agreement to define the future legal status of US forces.
NATO defence ministers meeting in Brussels on February 22 discussed keeping a combined NATO force of between 8,000 and 12,000 troops. That compares to combined NATO forces of about 100,000 troops in Afghanistan now.
General James Mattis, the head of the US military's Central Command, said in March he had recommended keeping 13,600 American troops in Afghanistan after 2014.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@US Centcom: Dear Centcom, For absolutely no rational reason, that I can think of, US/NATO forces have invaded Afghanistan and devastated the country. Now that the Taliban have taught you a severe lesson in how to fight asymmetric warfare for nearly 13 years you want to get out and are suggesting that Pakistan pick up the pieces. That is a good try, but I suggest that you forget it. Even Pakistan cannot be that stupid. You have created billions of dollars worth of damage in Afghanistan. Fix the damage and get out. Obviously, the thousands of innocent people you have killed will never come back. I will not go into all the lost innocent lives and infrastructure damage in Pakistan, caused by US drones.
@US Centcom. Your sentiment is nice but naive and ignores Pakistan's behavior. Pakistan has allowed almost 1/2 it's own territory to fall under the control of militants - so why would they go out of there way to help Afghanistan?
Pakistan is already playing a positive role in Afghanistan by not forceably expelling millions of Afghans living off Pakistan, allowing supplies in and out of Afghanistan through its territory and air space, releasing Afghan prisoners at Kabul's request, etc. How about NATO playing a positive role and attacking the Talibans in Afghanistan, the original reason why they invaded Afghanistan n the first place?
@Jamshed:
Isn't that the irony everyone see's? NATO, from now on tell Pakistan to play a positive role in Pakistan. Forget Afghanistan, Pakistan is losing many more civilians as a result of their proxies than Afghanistan is. How is a Taliban front going to conquer Kabul with Nato fighters and drones above? Does Pakistan think the people of Afghanistan don't want to send their daughters to school? Does Pakistan think they don't like watching the news or TV programs? Do they think they don't appreciate their cell phones or music? Do they think they will favor the Taliban to an extent to which there will be a Taliban controlled Afghanistan once again? Popularity of the Taliban in Afghanistan is abysmal and the people are aware of their roots now.
It's clear that when it comes to instability and civilian casualties, under that calculation, Pakistan shares a far worse fate. So, what is the calculus?
Pakistan needs to play a positive role in Pakistan before any other nation. Lets start with pleading with them to save themselves.
There is nothing odd in asking Pakistan to play a positive role in bringing stability in the region. I do not think Pakistan and its people would like anything else. The people of the region have suffered instability and terror for decades. Now that The NATO forces are ready to leave, it brings more responsibility on Pakistan to maintain that peace and stability in the region that all have been striving for. It has been the combined efforts of all parties involved that people in Afghanistan have a ray of hope and they look forward to a better tomorrow. It is incumbent on all its neighbors to ensure that the progress made in Afghanistan over the years continues, so people do not regress back to life of mayhem.
Abdul Quddus DET-United States Central Command
"Pakistan must play a positive role in bringing stability to Afghanistan......"
Seriously? Pakistan (government) is not playing a positive role in Pakistan and you're expecting it to play a positive role in Afghanistan? You should ask for the stars and the moon while you're at it Mr. Rasmussen!
NATO/US needs to be honest to the people of this region. They need to go after the sancturies of sucide bombers & jihadis. If they cant or dont want to do that they need to invest in resources like Afghan Airforce with latest technologies like drones & other modern warfare. They need to ensure that sancturies & sponsers of terror are punished economically & physically.
why this report does not mention the increasing frustration of pakistani govt with puppet karzai and his cronies.this report gives the impression that its the pak that is the culprit.
very poor report. needs to have balance of views, if you do not want to be more pro pakistani.
I'm sick and tired of hearing this term "Pakistan should do more or Pakistan must play positive role".....why can't NATO and Afghan forces do their due diligence to bring peace in Afghanistan or they should simply accept the defeat.
As if America is playing positive role in Pakistan or Afghanistan, Iran China, Russia, Middle East, Vietnam,