The writer heads the Centre for Education and Development in Bahrain, Swat
zubair.torwali@tribune.com.pk
There are thousands of contestants for the forthcoming elections to be held under a considerably free and upright Election Commission. Voters’ confusion, this time around, is an indicator of free and fair elections. This time, there seems to be no state institution twisting the general will as per its wishes; and hopefully, the elections will be regarded as just by political and democratic forces. In this sense, the elections are not engineered. However, there are “invisible contestants” in the elections who want to manoeuvre them in their favour.
The murder of a local leader of the Awami National Party (ANP) in Swat on April 14, subsequent attacks on its leaders in Charsadda and, of course, the murder of an MQM candidate in Hyderabad a few days ago as well as the most recent attack on Ghulam Ahmad Bilour of the ANP are all obvious signs that this time, the Taliban — the invisible contestants — want not only to sabotage the elections but also to turn them in their favour. The ANP is the single political party in Pakistan which has — no doubt, with many leadership and governance flaws — been consistent in fighting the deadly enemy within. This is the reason that the ANP has been singled out by the Taliban among scores of political parties in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P), the political stronghold of the ANP. Along with the ANP, the MQM and the PPP are also on the hit list of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan. Both the ANP and the PPP are regarded as being of leftist ideology, although in Pakistani politics, ideology has long been replaced with opportunism and rhetoric, and is virtually left to the extremists, both religious and ethnic.
With too many political parties having colliding interests, there is no hope of any consensus on the menace of terrorism. Had political parties had a consensus on extremism, there would have been no vocal threats, let alone assaults on political and democratic forces by extremists. The lack of a national consensus on terrorism among the political forces in Pakistan is the real tragedy faced by the nation. This seems to predicate a number of issues that need to be resolved.
First, it implies that political parties are not serious enough on the subject of extremism; and this is evident from their manifestos. Many among them even regard that the terrorism in the country is imposed by certain foreign powers that are at war with other extremists somewhere outside Pakistan.
Second, political forces are helpless before certain other forces which, in turn, do not want to root out terrorism completely.
Third, the lack of consensus on terrorism implies that Pakistani society in its entirety actually wants what the extremists are apparently out for. Despite the widespread apologists in the media and social media, this doesn’t seem to be the reality. How many in Pakistan buy what the religious political parties sell? In any nationwide free elections, these parties have never been successful in securing majority votes. They didn’t even perform well despite being covertly supported by the secret agencies in Pakistan.
The security forces of Pakistan must, at least, confine the invisible contestants to their hideouts and protect the democratic forces, especially the centre-left political parties, so as to ensure free and fair elections. Otherwise, the May 11 elections may be deemed engineered — this time, by the so-called non-state actors. Furthermore, political parties need a unanimous stance against extremism in all its varieties to free the nation of its bloody grip. Otherwise, there seems to be no hope for a prosperous and peaceful Pakistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 18th, 2013.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
sir you are looking very optimistic, thats very good thing.but in reality would you believe that our street leaders are mature enough to understand the real issues. i am ashamed to say them our politician of national calibre, those who cannot remain silent on opposites point of view for about four to five minutes in a talk show then how can they make a clear-cut strategy for taliban or other terrorist groups???please elaborate your point of view under the shadow of my viewpoint......
And you forgot the important one; the media. They also print selected writings. One sends a writing to two news papers, the bigger one prints it and the other one not. Why? Is it not that one of them has some 'reservation'? In other words they are biased and have certain people or party in mind to be promoted. The same writing or opinion, when comes from a big writer, they publish it. In fact, they also want a particular person or party to come in to power. So its not only the 'non-state-actors who are engineering these elections but the media is playing it's role with the same cruelty. These selective news papers are part of this conspiracy.