However, in attempting to track down the students, the addresses found on scholarship applications have been declared false by the HEC. Despite this, the HEC maintains that its selection process is rigorous and that it chooses candidates after careful review. What kind of scrutiny is practised if even the addresses on applications are found to be false? This is a matter over which the HEC should be questioned — and asked to improve upon for the future.
Moreover, the Commission should communicate more with foreign graduate schools beforehand, as several students have claimed unfit conditions upon reaching their institutions, including one student who could not find a graduate adviser upon arriving at his university, while another cited poor laboratory conditions in which to do research. Evidently, there are flaws in the scholarship programme and its selection process.
Nonetheless, the contract required that students return home upon completion of their studies, which would have helped prevent further brain drain from the country, a phenomenon that has been occurring for the past several decades. The initiative was a positive one — to have students bring back their acquired knowledge and skills and share it with fellow citizens to help move Pakistan forward. As such, the students should be tracked and demanded to return home.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 11th, 2013.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
ask pakistan embassy for execution of contract.
Should have had a loan instead of a scholarship.
fake degrees of elected representatives, and now scholars giving fake addresses,,i hope the new govt. in Pakistan fixes its priorities to set its house in order
" Nonetheless, the contract required that students return home upon completion of their studies, which would have helped prevent further brain drain from the country, a phenomenon that has been occurring for the past several decades. The initiative was a positive one — to have students bring back their acquired knowledge and skills and share it with fellow citizens to help move Pakistan forward. As such, the students should be tracked and demanded to return home"`. If a contract is got signed by HEC to compel the scholarship holder return home after completion of study( with so called intention to stop brain drain and contribute to help to improve the situation on domestic soil) it will be of no use.. Student will first to make use of his developed skill at overseas level where better opportunities are available. That way asol he/ she shall be contributing as Pakistani diaspora by inward remittance, better Pakistani image and so forth. It is ridiculous to compel to return . what if on return he feels misfit with the skill possessed , Will HEC continue to compel his/ her stay in Pakistan? An honest answer to it will explain the futility of so called clause in the agreement.with the students..