Younis Masih, 34, a labourer, was arrested in September 2005 in the low-income Qenchi Amar Siddhu neighbourhood of Lahore after local residents accused him of interrupting a gathering of Sufi singing to make blasphemous remarks.
Masih's lawyer, Naeem Shakir, said his client was sentenced to death in May 2007 and fined 100,000 rupees ($1,000), but appealed to the high court in Lahore.
"The high court on Wednesday decided to overturn the death sentence and ordered that Masih be acquitted," Shakir told AFP.
"I argued the case in February and put to the court that there is no direct evidence against Younis Masih and that the case was based on hearsay," he said.
Blasphemy is a very sensitive issue in Pakistan, where 97 percent of the 180 million population are Muslims, and even unproven allegations can spark a violent public backlash.
Rights campaigners argue the blasphemy laws, for which the maximum penalty is death, are often abused to settle personal scores and should be reformed.
Shakir said his client would be freed "in a couple of days" after he obtained a written copy of the decision and a detailed judgement.
The deputy prosecutor general confirmed the acquittal.
Nadeem Anthony, a lawyer working for the independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan also confirmed the acquittal and hailed the high court decision.
Last month, more than 3,000 furious Muslims rampaged through the Joseph Colony area of Lahore, looting property and burning buildings after a Christian was accused of blasphemy.
Surrounding Punjab province was also the scene of one of the worst outbreaks of anti-Christian violence when a mob burned 77 houses and killed seven people in the town of Gojra in 2009 after rumours that a Quran had been desecrated.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Hamaad Haider: yeah m agree n now he is helpless...
@mind control: no he is not safe here please help him if u can
Would the judge see fit to bring all those people who has made this poor man suffer for six years to the same Islamic injunctions under which this man was tried? Any chance of an eye for an eye??
Let us hope he is not murdered like other innocents before him.
http://dawn.com/2012/09/19/timeline-accused-under-the-blasphemy-law/
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/101east/2013/03/20133181026613893.html
Aquital is good.................but the person who wrongly accused him must be punished, if justice is to be served.
UN must make Blasphemy Law mandatory.
Zindabad
@Rafiq: If the punishment for a blasphemer is death, then the punishment for wrongly accusing someone of blasphemy should also be death!
Is he going to be safe when freed?
Who will compensate for the suffering of six years jail for no fault of him. The property of complainant should be confiscated and compensation paid to victim.
A sufi who subjects anyone to the black Blasphemy Law is not a sufi. A court that upholds the black Blasphemy Law is not a court.
Excellent decision....misuse of blasphemy has to be stopped.