In my years in Pakistan, and while living abroad, ‘government’ in Pakistan embodied everything dysfunctional, corrupt and inefficient. In fact, the first time someone mentioned the prospect of a stint in the government a couple of years ago, my instinctive reaction was “God forbid”.
How did I end up taking the position of chairman of the Punjab Information Technology Board (PITB), heading all public sector IT projects in the province? It started with a call on my cell phone shortly after I received the MIT TR35 award, given to the top 35 young innovators in the world. “I am Shahbaz Sharif, chief minister of Punjab,” spoke the person on the other end of the phone. “I just heard about your brilliant work and the honour and prestige you have brought for Pakistan. I would like to meet and congratulate you in person.” A little startled, I hesitantly agreed.
A couple of months later, I was finally persuaded to accept a government position. The chief minister has a steely resolve and follows up relentlessly. In my one year with the government, I have received BBM messages from him from 2 am to 6 am and at all other times. What time he actually sleeps, I have not been able to figure out.
There are many things I learned during my time with the government. Above all, I am convinced that our system, largely a remnant of the Raj, is hurting more than helping. The structure of the government, rules of business, interfaces between institutions, funding and monitoring of projects, all need a serious revamp. There is a significant disconnect between the salary, workload and responsibility of the bureaucracy. Many functions of the government need to be spun off into organisations run by specialists from the private sector.
Repeated changes in government, followed by ruthless periods of accountability, has made everyone decision-shy. No one wants to associate with a project of any significance, because of fear of targeted accountability in case of an adversarial government change. Often successful careers are built by stopping or evading a project, rather than actively contributing to something that may become successful, and hence, prone to political opposition.
The political uncertainty erodes the writ of the government. Institutional reform inevitably takes many years of sustained effort and most dysfunctional organisations have simply learned to outlive abortive political regimes. I was tasked by the chief minister to help reform and automate the Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education. While we successfully revamped the entire exam system in this last year, I have been told many times to my face that they are simply waiting for the government to change before they go back to their old habits.
My time with the government further reinforced my view that technology can indeed be a powerful enabler for reform. Even with a simple intervention like the use of smartphones for monitoring field workers, performance of government departments can be improved manifold. We coordinated the entire dengue campaign in Punjab with smartphones, used by more than 17 departments. The fieldworkers reported close to 45,000 geotagged activities to prevent the dengue epidemic in 2012. Through technology, we could track and record this stellar performance of the government.
There is a need to systematically build the capacity of second-tier political leadership. If democracy has to flourish in this country, politicians would need to be professionally more competent than both the civil and military bureaucracy. People like me would also hope that Pakistan may one day move from a constituency-based politics to one where national policy, governance and performance win elections. The volume and pace of development work in Punjab is a step in that direction.
As I look back at my year in the government, I have collected many bittersweet memories. The Metro Bus System was built in 11 months — so it can be done. Still, in my time in the government, I saw many projects delivered on unreal timelines. The set of bureaucrats and politicians that worked on key projects with the chief minister regularly worked 18-hour days, often up against onerous government processes and an unforgiving media glare. We did avert another dengue epidemic in 2012 and our smartphone-based monitoring framework is now becoming the de facto standard for monitoring in other government departments. The exam system of matriculation and intermediate students was successfully revamped. Through our anti-corruption citizen feedback model, we have reached over 1.3 million citizens and taken scores of punitive actions against reports of corruption. The Arfa Software Technology Park is now a successful enterprise, complete with one of the first full-service IT start-up incubators in Pakistan. Our IT university is up and running, with focus on research and entrepreneurship and promise to become the IIT of Pakistan.
Still, much needs to be done. We need to rethink and revamp the system, focus on governance and performance and hope for a stable, mature democratic set-up.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 31st, 2013.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
great stuff.
But "ruthless accountability"?! When did that happen?
Work you did really perfect specially intermediate board and Plan9.I hope you will continue this great work for our country.
Best Wishes
@ishrat salim: It's not just Lahore that has benefitted but cities throughout the Punjab; I have been to Sialkot, Rawalpindi, Faisalabad, Multan and Bawalapur - they all have shown tangible improvements. No one doubts the dedication and resolve of Shahbaz Sharif even if they disagree with the Motorways or Metro Bus Service being constructed. People like the author represent the reason why Pakistan can and will succeed. When competent committed and professional individuals work for real change in Pakistan, anything is Pakistan.
@Taimoor: Well things take time. It will take 50 years for you to become equivalent to IIT and another 50 to MIT , if , IIT/MIT standards remain same in next 100 years.
Keep it up. Dr Saif. We are proud of you and proud of CM Punjab. May you and Shahbaz Sharif continue to serve people of this country for a long time to come,
Great job. have you considered running a course in ethics as mandatory for all government employees and college students. No need for professors or lectures. Just make it online like every US Federal Government employee has to take every year.
Dr, you are doing a great job for the country. And greatly said, elections should be won on performance basis. Our country does needs sincere and hardworking people.
Nice to hear a sane, balanced, pragmatic, and patriotic voice.
@Zuhaib Khan: Pls see my comment...that is what i said...fr them lahore is pakistan...this mentality has to change if they want to rule whole of Pakistan...& beside that they have proved to be less corrupt than PPP govt, whether it is Sindh, KP & Baluchistan or G&B.....
@ Ishrat Salim
I must correct you: For PLMN, Lahore is Pakistan. They have regional and ethnic mentality. Though I am not a supporter of PPP, but from a national perspective I would favor PPP compared to PLMN ( This is for comparison purpose as I am not going to vote PPP).
There is nothing wrong to expect PML N comeback...but fr them Lahore is Punjab only....this mindset should change, if they want to work for the whole country....it is recorded fact that their only FOCUS is lahore, Pindi / Islamabad....this mindset should change & equal effort should be paid for the development of other part of Punjab...especially South Punjab, which has become a factory churning out extremist elements, due to unemployment.
Further use of IT can lead to improved governance. More IT for good governance is a must.
@Umer: come on. get a life.
Thank You for Helping Pakistan
Dr. Umar Sahib,
Your piece is very refreshing. More power to your voice and work!
PMLN election campaign in disguise.
Well done Dr Sahib
Great article however there are couple of points I will beg to differ. "Pakistan may one day move from a constituency-based politics', No, the beauty and success of the American politics is based upon the local governments and it is constituency based. As they say in the US that all politics are local. We got to get away from this centralized governmental system, since everything got to stem from Islamabad which creates tremendous amount of inefficiency and above all corruption. I will suggest that the tenure time should be cut from 5 years to 2 years for NA and PAs and one would see how responsive the politicians will be to the needs of constituents. About second-tier political leadership, it will be like pulling teeth, the political dynasties will fight to it's death to allow second-tier leadership, even if they will allow then the second-tier will be based on son, daughter, grand son or grand daughter, there will no outsiders in spite of their capabilities. It all boils down to education and education, if the masses are educated, then they will force the second and even third tier system upon the reluctant dynastic political parties. As every one could guess, the ruling elite has deliberately kept the masses ignorant and uneducated to perpetuate their hold on governing the country one way or the other.Thank you for your candid assessment and valuable suggestions, I appreciate it.
You are right, At Least the civil and military bureaucracy dont have "Jaa'li degrees", the politicians are sent to the parliament to make constitutional reforms and and to give the direction to civilian and military bureaucracy and on the top of that they are the one who has to make enough laws to curtail corruption on all levels , An uneducated team of politicians will never be able to do all this. their job is not to make or look after the construction of bridges, making pakki nalian, primary schools, influencing police in their respective constituencies etc..., they come to politics because they have hunger for the power...
"We need to rethink and revamp the system, focus on governance and performance and hope for a stable, mature democratic set-up"
Dr Sb, your conclusion show that IT, UET and medical universities should include social and policy sciences in their curriculum or such departments should be created in these universities. No technology can solve problems of Pakistan unless we will fix governance. We don't have trained people who understand governance problem in Pakistan and suggest some solutions.
Pakistan has more doctors, engineers, IT specialist and scientists than 30 years ago, but overall health, traffic, energy, crop etc (list will go on) problems have increased dramatically. This is due to governance problems. I hope you will include social and policy sciences in your university rather than teaching IT only.
Key lines, which i realy appreciate and would like people to remind their leaders, constantly. I am glad that PMLn have taken steps, like taking you and Sir Michael Barber on board. Best Wishes for Pakistan ! "If democracy has to flourish in this country, politicians would need to be professionally more competent than both the civil and military bureaucracy. People like me would also hope that Pakistan may one day move from a constituency-based politics to one where national policy, governance and performance win elections."
Legend Lines
If democracy has to flourish in this country, politicians would need to be professionally more competent than both the civil and military bureaucracy
People like Umar Saif and Salim Ghauri (NETSOL) should be appreciated for their services for the country and by also encouraging them to develop policies which can provide as base structure of Pakistan's Technology .
Deeply disturbing....
@Aisha Minhas, Sherif brothers are not bad politicians they are great peoples if we give them chance look it Motorways they try to build it but our beraucracy and army got involved and put hurdle in it i wish they come again in punjab and even in central govt to change the country luck...
Great job Dr Umar well done sir. i wish some one change the raj fazool laws too.
I have great respect for you, but in one of your previous articles, didn't you liken the IT university as being the MIT of Pakistan? So now, the standard has dropped from MIT to IIT?
Good to see government-academia links working. This partnership is needed very much. LUMS is really leading the way in this and every week one hears good news of the excellent efforts that this university has been taking to ink its faculty and students to Pakistan society in very real ways. Proud of LUMS and everyone associated with it.
Brilliant! I hope more professionals like Dr. Umar Saif work for the public-sector and more political government's give such people an opportunity to contribute. Amazing how even one person can have such huge impact on the government machinery.