India outraged over Pakistan's resolution for Afzal Guru

Indian minister calls resolutions an interference in India's internal matters.


Aditi Phadnis March 15, 2013
Members of the Indian Parliament expressed anger and accused that Pakistan was attempting to interfere in India's internal affairs. ILLUSTRATION: JAMAL KHURSHID

NEW DELHI: India on Friday reacted with outrage to a resolution passed by the National Assembly of Pakistan on the execution of Afzal Guru.

Guru was hanged last month on the charge of being part of the conspiracy to bomb Indian Parliament.

Members of the Indian Parliament expressed anger and accused that Pakistan was attempting to interfere in India's internal affairs. The two houses of Parliament passed unanimous resolutions and MPs spoke harshly about Pakistan's resolution passed on Thursday.

“The House rejects interference in the internal affairs of India and calls upon the National Assembly of Pakistan to desist from such acts of support for extremist and terrorist elements”, the resolution passed by the Indian Parliament stated.

It further stated, “The House reiterates that the entire State of Jammu and Kashmir including the territory under illegal occupation of Pakistan is and shall always be an integral part of India.  Any attempt from any quarter to interfere in the internal affairs of India will be met resolutely and with complete unity of our nation.”

The leader of the Upper House Arun Jaitley , speaking on India-Pakistan relations, said, " Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, has in the past been very magnanimous to say that he is willing to walk an extra mile. After a series of these provocations, we would like to urge him that forget a mile, he should now forget walking even an extra yard.”

Expressing his verdict on the matter he further said that Pakistan was showing sympathy for terrorists attacking India so structured dialogue between the two countries should end.

“Pakistan will now have to walk extra two miles rather than our Prime Minister wanting to walk an extra mile. If we want to normalise relations, with these kinds of resolutions, normalisation of relations will not be possible," he concluded.

India’s backlash, on Pakistan’s resolution for Afzal Guru, included a counter resolution and cancelling the hockey match series between India and Pakistan.

The Hockey India cancelled the tour when they reportedly received a letter, from the Minister of External Affairs, asking them to cancel the series. Everything had been prepared for the series, including clearances from the Sports and Interior Ministries.

Sporting ties between the two countries snapped after the 2008 Mumbai attacks. While cricket remained off-limits for the Pakistanis, hockey wasn't.

Visa cancellation cannot be ruled out, though a conference on trade ties between India and Pakistan organised by think tank Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), stayed on course.

COMMENTS (93)

Hasan | 11 years ago | Reply

@Gp65:

I often find that among Hindustanis, the desperation to cobble together something resembling a prestigious history means they have to grasp at different strands and try to piece them together to form something meaningful. Unfortunately you seem to have done the same thing here.

If anything, Ayub must have been surprised in 1965 at the ease with which Pakistani forces cut through Akhnoor - Hindustan's blushes were saved only by the illegal incursion into Pakistani territory. Even then, with an unguarded Lahore in front of them, Hindustanis failed to secure their objective of 'drinking tea in Lahore gymkhana'. 1971 was hardly a lesson in Hindustani strength - if anything it was just a tribute to your national duplicity and brutal policy of communal agitation; you only see it as a national victory in the absence of any other credible national victories. This is all, of course, totally off-topic, but it is upsetting that you people have so much trouble coming to terms with your own historical failures.

As for 1999, sadly the history is still too recent for you to start trying to paper it over; Kargil was indeed a massive tactical success for Pakistan, and Hindustani 'strength' was only really its ability to beg and plea every ally from Washington to Tel Aviv to intercede. So yes, you can accept it as a diplomatic victory; but you should have the dignity to avoid converting these into non-existent military ones.

History has proven that Hindustan, sadly, only really understands language that comes from the back of the hand - it has little credible military authority, so its best bet is to stick to its traditional role of whispering encouragement to Washington whenever a Pak-Hind flashpoint comes up.

Hasan

Gp65 | 11 years ago | Reply

@Hasan: Musharraf left in 2008. It appears that every COAS has to find out for themselves that India is not a pushover. Ayub discovered it in 1965" Yahya in 1971, Zia during the Siachen episode and Musharraf learnt that lesson twice. First in 1999 when Pakistani army attacked without having the courage to admit it was Pakistani army and was defeated. Then his non-state actors strategy misfired due to India's response to parliament attack in Dec 2001. Kayani has restarted the cauldron again. Ceasefire violations are on an increasing trend since 2010. JeM thacohan been driven underground now openly operates once more in Pakistan and so on. No Pakistani COAS wants to learn from history it seems which is unfortunate because the conflict does not serve either country well.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ