Army denies NYT story of possibly conducting drone strikes

ISPR spokesperson says, such accusation are a distortion of facts and aimed at diluting the stance on drone strikes.


Web Desk March 05, 2013
The New York Times had reported that two drone strikes had swooped into remote areas, killing up to nine people, including two senior commanders of Al Qaeda.

RAWALPINDI: After a news report published in the New York Times on Tuesday claimed that the US had not conducted two drone strikes in early February, rather it may have been Pakistan, an Inter-services Public Relations (ISPR) spokesperson termed the accusation a  distortion of the facts. 

In a statement issued in Rawalpindi, the spokesperson denied any operation conducted by Pakistan’s security forces, including air strikes in the tribal belt in early February, as mentioned in the New York Times report.

"Such an accusation is a distortion of the facts and seems to be aimed at diluting Pakistan's stance on drone strikes," the statement read.

Earlier on Tuesday, the American daily had reported that the CIA, which operates the drone programme, had denied the strikes. Previously, the CIA has never confirmed nor denied drone strikes.

The strikes in question were carried out on February 6 and February 8 and had killed up to nine people, including two senior commanders of al Qaeda in early February. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry had also lodged an official protest with the American Embassy over the incidents.

“They were not ours,” an official with knowledge of the programme, told the publication on the condition of anonymity. “We haven’t had any kinetic activity since January.”

The Americans’ best guess was that one or possibly both of the strikes were carried out by the Pakistani military and falsely attributed to the CIA to avoid criticism from the Pakistani public, reported the daily.

COMMENTS (28)

Ahmed | 8 years ago | Reply

@haider: Anyone can put a bomb on a drone but the fact is Pakistan doesn't have the precision weaponry for drones. Precision weaponry require prevision guidance and we don't have a guidance or satellite system in place.

Try to learn facts for a change.

anwar | 8 years ago | Reply

@Ssabi: could be renegade Afghan units (clearly they are NOT US

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read