First of all, I am rather impressed that there is such a reaction to the statement. I have visited Hyderabad numerous times, owing to lots of relatives living there, but I had never realised that people there have such a love of education, especially the traders! Seeing a large presence of child labour in the main market area, I would have never fathomed that these very traders who mistreat and overwork school age children will go on strike to defend their access to higher education. I am also rather pleased that people in a city where less than half the population can barely read or write have such love for higher education that they are appalled at the misguided statement of the minister. How mistaken I really am!
To come to reality, this issue is the same as the PhD issue highlighted several times by people like Pervez Hoodbhoy. Just as the concern on the PhD side is the ‘number’ of PhDs being churned out, rather than their quality, here, too, the ‘numbers’ game seems paramount. So, no one wonders why Hyderabad needs more universities when it has two state and two private universities already. Has anyone ever done a survey or feasibility report of the number of people in Hyderabad who are graduating out of colleges but are uncatered for in higher education? Probably not. This is because for most Pakistanis, the government and others, the ‘number’ of universities is important. Therefore, Lahore presently has around 29 degree-awarding institutions, while Karachi is only one university behind. With such a large number of universities, it is naturally assumed that higher education is flourishing and that there is nothing really wrong with this.
However, the reality is that for most of these institutions, the degree students earn is not even worth the paper it is printed on. Why? Simply because a large number of these ‘degree-awarding institutions’, do not have any quality. Most of these places are set up by enterprising gentlemen who are hoping to replicate the money making business private schools have thrived on. Most fail in this endeavour since it is extremely hard to get any decent professors for these universities and the provision of adequate facilities for these large projects eats into the profits these people earn. So, the hapless students, eager to benefit from this boom in higher education, are left at the mercy of substandard campuses and barely literate professors. Therefore, by the time these students graduate, they can hardly string together a sentence of idiomatic English and are not even proficient in any other language either. Despite a ‘degree’ in hand they are still unemployable.
I leave you with two simple thoughts on the Hyderabad university controversy. First, why not think of making Sindh University and Mehran University world-class universities? I spent a week at Sindh University during my PhD research, and having known some faculty members there, I can safely say that its standards are falling dramatically. Not only is the university rife with student politics of the most dangerous kind, students and faculty seem to have given up on each other. In my week there, I was working at the Institute of Sindhology, a very good research library, but I never saw more than two to three students enter it for reading a book. As a matter of fact, the librarian told me that he could not even get 30 signatures from students when he was trying to petition for longer opening hours. So, why not turn these universities, which already exist, around, and then enlarge them as needs expand?
Secondly, universities only come after good schooling. If students in schools are not taught how to think (and read and write), inculcating these concepts in university is too late. Before the establishment of new universities, we need a huge investment in creating good schools, as they form the backbone of a literate society.
With a very large school and university-going population, Pakistan really needs to set its priorities right, or else, soon it will be too late and the powers of ignorance and extremism will engulf us even further.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 26th, 2013.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Sometimes in order to improve upon our dwindling vote bank we tend to make erstwhile promises, in this case, agreed it is totally out of line as even suggesting a small place like Hyderabad should have anotehr state owned University is bizzare. Sind already has an excellent University KArachi, Sind and SALU. What we need to understand is that higher education is not a joke, to churn out MBAs or Doctors or Engineers and now PhDs. There has to be an intelligent market survey of what the need, requirement is and set our standards high in order for the world to recognize our PhDs.
A long debate.....
So if Sindh University cannot perform to the required standard, we shouldnt open up new universities :)? How about closing Sindh University and reducing all the budget being wasted there and built a University with professional staff selected on the basis of expertise and not on the basis of the regional language they speak
One cannot deny the fact that there is immense need to improve quality of all - barring few - existing degree-awarding institutes. But one can also not notj ustify uncalled for statement from an education minister. Why would he say that he will not allow any more universities in Hyderabad? Giving the same argument you presented, did the education minister do the analysis and arrived at the decision that more unversities are not needed there and exisiting universities there are enough? Did he mention that rather than adding more universities he intends to improve the quality of existing ones?
@Hasan You are mistaken about the standard of British undergraduate education. I live in Britain and have a son who will start university in September this year. I also volunteer for a university here as an employability mentor for students. If you only go to the classes, do your coursework and even get the top grades, you may still not get a good enough job. There are 2 main reasons for this, the quality of A level education in UK has dropped so significantly that students studying maths here are 2 years behind than those in Far East, this was research quoted in BBC but I cant find the link now. This affects the quality of university education. Secondly, the universities, especially the top universities (Cambridge, Oxford, UCL etc.) are more academically aligned and do not equip students with skills for relevant professions. So the graduates are good enough as researchers in a university lab but not professionals in the industry. Hence, students either have to study by themselves to get those skills or get low/unpaid work experience to bridge the gap that the universities have left. On the contrary, I have seen students from NUST, FAST, GIKI and even Karachi and SirSyed universities get well paid technology jobs soon after landing in the UK. Of course the visa rules have now tightened.
Its simple. No one is interested in raising the standard of education. Government is here to destroy the people. We can never acheive any sort of education turnaround unless we have a sincere govt. working. Someone said so many uni's in UK. Bhai see ther standard too....even if you get admission in any of the Top 10 or Top 20, you still are a 'renowed'. Not everyone stduies from Harward or MIT or Oxford etc..
@observer: The only difference i have seen ( i graduated from UC Berkeley) is that alumni from top universities in US are mostly CEOs of major corps and hence students find it extremely easy to secure internships at top companies. Not to mention there is a culture of innovation and money to support it in NA. Main objective for our students would be to get a job as soon as possible to support their families. PS: Most of the graduates from NED computer science during the 1990s have all become millionaires in United States either through their own startups or through working in google or yahoo.
Undergraduate education from some institutions in Pakistan is still of a high quality. We need to remember, at the undergraduate level, it does not matter how many patents does a university hold. It requires staff that have academic and professional experience (to align education to real life experiences), sound facilities (computers, internet, library and labs) and most of all motivated students. That is why some community colleges affiliated with universities in the US are offering more value in terms of education than the universities they are affiliated with as the staff in colleges focus only on education and their research and practice also focuses directly on teaching and not on getting patents (http://www.communitycollegereview.com/articles/29). In the UK, a survey has suggested that many universities with presumably higher standards have been rated poorly by the students in teaching (http://www.oxford-royale.co.uk/news/2012/10/02/students-give-edinburgh-worst-marks-for-teaching.html). Postgraduate education is a totally different ball game.
@khan, have you ever visited NUST, if so, than you may be well aware of its environment, where the freedom of expression and freedom for experiencing the things is very limited, students are under the strict military rules. so the quality of education cannot be judged only by the infrastructure and no of scholars allocated to the institution, rather there is another side also, which is the freedom that institution gives to its students to experience whatever their intellect allows them to do.i think this is one of the main difference between western education system and ours.
@The Khan:
and they say that standards in Pak are higher than the ones found in Caltech for example
CalTech has been granted approximately 1800 patents since 1980. The annual average is around 50.
How many patents these institutions with 'higher standards' hold? Including the 'Water Car'.
http://ott.caltech.edu/
@The Khan: I doubt your assertion that Pakistani education standards are higher than or even equal to some of the European or US universities, the fact is that most Pakistanis who come to US for education has excelled in Pakistan and they would have excelled any where but majority of Pakistani graduates could not hack it over here. Yes, there are some institutions in Pakistan which has excellent record but majority of them are sub standard. By the way the Senate and NA passed a bill to establishing 3 universities in Islamabad, why, beats me.As Dr.Banghas suggested, improve the quality of existing institutions instead of cropping up sub standard higher learning institution. Most of the advanced countries stress on quality education for their children because they are the building blocks for that country's future, I certainly can vouch for Kansas children and their schools, my grand daughter Devin, when she was 5years old had 10 computers in her small class room and they started learning at that tender age and now at age 9 I would not dream to compete with her in her knowledge of computers and this is precisely what Dr.Banghas is advocating, quality education and strong base for young children. when the base is strong then higher education is highly recommended.
Clearly, the guy didn't visit NUST where Sat II scores>2300 is needed for admission,GISK,Fast, UeT,Ned etc. Most of the students who graduate from these universities find admission to top colleges in western hemisphere and they say that standards in Pak are higher than the ones found in Caltech for example
Vote PTI. Build good schools to feed good students into good universities. Get rid of the old decaying system. Vote PTI.
Why are there so many universities in UK?