Forgotten electoral reforms

Published: February 22, 2013
The writer is Chief Executive of the Strengthening Participatory Organisation

The writer is Chief Executive of the Strengthening Participatory Organisation

While Dr Tahirul Qadri’s melodrama could not derail democracy, it succeeded in veering focus away from the agenda of electoral reforms, which Pakistan’s parliament, civil society, election commission and other stakeholders have been scrambling with for years. The government circumvented details of the much-needed reforms, which in December, seemed within reach. It is easier for the government to maintain the status quo by focusing on Qadri’s reforms, which are impractical and even unconstitutional. The smokescreen has obscured the real reform agenda, which is doable and would give a shot in the arm to democracy.

A credible voters’ list is imperative for holding credible elections but the new voters’ lists are still in the doldrums. Coming up with error-free and polling station-wise voters lists are tasks yet to be finished by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). Voter registration should be concomitant with the issuance of CNICs to avoid lacunas in the voters’ lists.

Participation of women as voters and candidates remains a grey area. The conundrum of 10 million missing women from the electoral rolls is still unresolved; it is also important that 36.5 million registered women are able to vote. It was disappointing that some political parties opposed the recommendations regarding the legislation against stymieing women from voting. Making the validity of results at any polling station contingent upon a threshold of women voters would be the right step. Determining this threshold requires gender-disaggregated turnout data at polling stations, but the law has no such provision. In the absence of such data, determining how many women have voted is confined to guesstimates. To ensure enhanced women’s participation, the ECP needs to recruit and capacitate sufficient female polling staff.

Transparency in compilation of election results is an area of concern. The ECP and the government have often welcomed independent electoral observers but the accreditation process is bereft of any legal cover.

In 2009, the ECP developed a reforms package, which was submitted to the prime minister. In the aftermath of the Eighteenth Amendment and subsequent revisions, the ECP submitted an improvised package to the government in 2010. In 2011, the National Assembly (NA) Subcommittee on Election Reform prepared a report in response to the ECP’s proposals. The report was submitted to the NA’s Standing Committee on Law and Justice in 2012, which accepted the report and sent it to the ECP for incorporating the suggestions in the draft Bill. It contained only a few insignificant improvements. While the ECP is not a legislative entity, parliamentarians should have spearheaded the legislation process. The Subcommittee’s work is still lying in cold storage.

In October 2012, a parliamentary committee held a public hearing on key reforms for the general elections. Several Pakistani and international civil society organisations made some concrete recommendations for legislative action. However, all these efforts were scuttled by Dr Qadri’s dharna.

Legislators have to demonstrate the political will and commitment to free, fair, inclusive and transparent elections. This, however, cannot be achieved through ‘talk shops’ but through immediate legislative action.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 23rd, 2013.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (3)

  • Muneer
    Feb 23, 2013 - 11:41AM

    How has Dr.Qadri’s dharna scuttled the process of electoral reforms?.It has actually strengthened the process.Examples are:Government has agreed to legislate for 15 days scruitny time,where as ECP now wants,one month as demanded by the dharna gathering.Focus on degree confirmation,meetings with relevant officials on loan,tax and utility bills defaulters etc means finding out whether the would be legislatures meets the laid down criteria in Articles 62 and 63 or not.It may not be all but efforts in that direction.The pressure put on the ECP has made it work more robustly.The authors’ suggestion of the required legislation is a necessity, but the current legislatures are unlikely to do it voluntarily or through court orders or pressure through civil society only.But they can be forced to legislate for electoral reforms and claim it, if massive public pressure is generated like the one of Dr. Qadri’s dharna did.  


  • liberal_pak
    Feb 23, 2013 - 11:09PM

    Very valid points raised in this article. Thanks for educating us. Govt should do the needful to ensure free and fair polls, otherwise country will face more instability.


  • bball
    Feb 24, 2013 - 4:12AM

    I guess the above is perhaps taken from a annual update to the donors of this organization explaining the futility of their efforts. we were almost there um – if it wasn’t for the qadri dharna. not our fault!!!


More in Opinion