Intelligence agencies had warned law enforcers of a possible second attack on the Hazara community in Quetta, the Supreme Court has been informed.
A three-judge bench was hearing on Wednesday a suo motu case on the devastating February 16 attack, which killed at least 89 people. The judges expressed satisfaction with reports from the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Intelligence Bureau (IB), and sought the government’s response to the incident.
The president and prime minister have been asked to submit a response through the attorney general. The Supreme Court also summoned the Balochistan home secretary, Frontier Constabulary (FC) Commandant and Quetta police chief to appear before it at the next hearing (today) to explain what steps were taken to avert the attack.
On February 16, a powerful bomb exploded in Hazarganji targeting the Shia Hazaras for the second time in just over a month. Twin blasts on January 10 left over 100 people dead, most of them Hazaras.
Heading the bench, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said, “After going through the reports, we are to believe that the agencies performed their duties and shared intelligence with law enforcers in Quetta, indicating the likelihood of another terror attack on the community on the occasion of the Chehlum of the persons [who were killed] at Alamdar Road on January 10, 2013.”
He observed that the reports should be kept confidential and that the law enforcement agencies had accurate information of about 30% to 40% of what happened in the second attack.
The reports were submitted by the defence and interior secretaries. However, they were initially rejected by the court, which asked for them to be re-submitted after a few amendments.
Earlier in the day, Defence Secretary Lt Gen (retd) Asif Yasin Malik submitted reports gathered by the ISI. According to Justice Arif Khilji, the agency blamed the civil administration for not chalking out a policy on counter-terrorism in the prevalent circumstances in Balochistan.
The report stated that intelligence agencies had information about the transportation of 1,000kg of explosive material from Lahore to Quetta.
On the other hand Interior Secretary Khawaja Siddique Akbar described the IB report as confidential and requested it be kept secret.
He shared, however, that the water tanker carrying the explosives used in the February 16 bomb was prepared in a store in Quetta, which had been located, and efforts were being made to arrest its owner.
The chief justice was of the opinion that the intelligence agencies had completed their job and it was the duty of the law enforcers to act on their information and take steps to counter such incidents. The bench directed the interior and defence secretaries to submit their reports on progress in the January 10 attack.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 21st, 2013.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@j sardar:
oh bhai jan...Intelligence agencies are there to give the intelligence...you are not watching a Hollywood film... they did their job...the rest the other departments have to do ...
This is all that this man can do. Summon the entire town in court, thats it! OR Contempt of court! what a waste of time and government money. This very judiciary has done enough damage to the Will and Motivation of both the police and the FC and is responsible for this performance.
@j sardar: Prior knowlege of attack? isn't that what agencies are supposed to be doing !!! you are blaming agencies of doing their job? what an absolute ridiculous question.
It was clearly a no show from Quetta police and FC who didn't do their job. Full marks to intelligence agencies for highlighting the possible attack.
If you want the agencies to do all the work then we why are we wasting money on police and FC? The amount of work they must have lost due to making these findings public is enormous .. you will never understand how much work goes trying to gather amount of data and then probably lose it all because of an inefficient and illiterate police force. This judiciary is no better when it dosnt understand that part of this country is at war. It cannot treat everything is business as usual.
these agencies in pakistan are so funny......
Have the SC set up the expedited hearing in higher courts for the LEJ people arrested? What they are doing with Suo motu is good but swift hearing and dispension of justice of the terrorists attempted is vital.
And while he is at it he should also call for the details of this case...http://dawn.com/2011/07/19/lashkar-e-jhangvi-and-the-lack-of-evidence/ and explain the effects when courts did not do anything.....
Is this the only duty,shame on you,even American agencies also tell lie to there people like this after any happening.Get hold these double agents or informers,things will minimize.
@j sardar
There is a concept of informants, call trace and much more. Agencies in the world use it to gather such information. Often they get this sort of information very late and even if they get it in time the law enforcement agencies dont act enough to cater such attacks.
And we have to accept the fact that there are scenarios where they handled the situation very well. If they fail mostly thats another story i think.
Why president? Why not FC? The government doesn't go and makes arrests. It is the job of the state machinery to go after the killers, instead of just enjoying their salaries and perks.
To what end? There is plenty of blame to go around for the state of chaos in Quetta and Balochistan and I fail to see what the SC is trying to accomplish - being incompetent, ignorant or just not caring isn't against the law. I would add that the SC itself deserves some of the blame and if they are determined to help perhaps they should focus on fixing the judiciary system so the bad guys can be locked up.
Agencies had a knowledge of attack it is a very serious matter.How some one had a knowledge without being accomplice to it. Why agencies did not catch the culprits as they had the prior knowledge and they also know that civilian administration have no capability to deal with bombings.It is said that agencies had a prior knowledge of Quetta attack. Some one should dare to ask them how they got this information. There are lot of doubts and questions among the public about this prior knowledge of attack.
As expected, the Civilian Government is making excuses and trying to shift the blame for its inaction. We must learn to hold them accountable, rather than help them in shifting the blame to another institution.