Mariam Malik from the PECHS Government College for Women scored second position in the intermediate exams conducted by the Board of Intermediate Education, Karachi, in spite of having abysmally low attendance.
Malik would go to college two days a week to attend compulsory lab classes. The rest of the week, she would study at a tuition centre, which is the same distance from her home as her college. Since her college records did not penalise her for poor attendance, Mariam succeeded in getting admitted to Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, for their electronics programme.
“In college, we would see our seniors doing the same thing - preferring tuitions over college,” said Mariam in a telephone conversation with The Express Tribune. Most of the teachers at her college held regular classes but very few students would attend. “This trend will end only if they [teachers] bar students, who do not have a certain minimum attendance, from appearing in the examinations,” she explained.
According to the rulebook of the board, students with an attendance below 75 per cent cannot sit for exams. However, this rule is not implemented. “Students skip classes because they know that the teacher is not keeping a record,” said Mariam.
The principal of Delhi Science and Commerce College, Prof. Aminul Haq Khan, who has taught at public colleges for 37 years, said, “Student attendance depends upon the quality of education being offered.” Public colleges offer a “tamasha” in the name of education, he explained. He also pointed out that the distractions offered by public colleges, such as the possibility of joining a political organisation, have an impact on attendance.
According to the professor, opting for tuition centres became a trend in Karachi in early 1980’s when incompetent teachers infiltrated public colleges. “These teachers kept their jobs but didn’t make an effort to improve their teaching abilities,” he lamented.
Cashing on the situation
Many well-reputed teachers in public colleges run tuition centres - at times, during college hours. They give exclusive attention to students in exchange for a handsome fee. Thus, tuition centres become a better deal for both, the student and the teacher. Tuition centres on average charge Rs25,000 to Rs30,000 to be paid over a period of 10 months. The more famous ones extract a ‘yearly package’ - a lump sum tuition fee - so that the student wouldn’t leave to join another centre.
Syed Zain Khalid, who has been running two campuses of the SZ Coaching Centre in Gulshan-e-Iqbal for six years now, told The Express Tribune that tuition centres are popular because teachers in schools and colleges do not do justice to the profession. “In our centres, we group students according to their abilities,” he explained, adding that extra attention is offered to students with less aptitude.
Khalid, who is a graduate of NED University of Engineering and Technology, criticised the teachers of public colleges who drew regular salaries from the government but used the classrooms to market their “other business”. “Many teachers run private tuition centres and advise students to join them for individual attention,” said Khalid. “This has become a thriving business.”According to the chairperson of the board, Prof. Anwar Ahmed Zai, “Tuition culture definitely needs to be controlled. Had I been in a position to regulate them, I would bring them all into a system and make them observe the guidelines.”
Published in The Express Tribune, January 20th, 2013.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Government colleges are now dispensable. The govt should do away with them altogether and merge the two years of Intermediate education with high school. Colleges should start from Bachelors level only.
This tuition culture is playing the major role in make students "Ratta machine" and they can't think out of box. and teachers who market their tuition centres at colleges forces students to have tuitions from their centres and don't put their best colleges.
that girl Mariam Malik would've been very smart coz I took GIK entrance exam and it was super hard.
Well, the headline has the answer of this...
How interesting is the case presented here by this journalist, regarding the condition of the tuition centers becoming the center of the universe.
There is no mention of the syllabus and its outdated nature, nor is there any particular reference to the government's nonchalance towards their curriculum or even, for that matter, the way that this curriculum is fodder for students to become academic slaves.
There is no mention of the student quality itself, opting to keep the article vague in lieu of a better argument towards damning tuition centers.
And just the positive side of the tuition centers? How biased. I suppose that money talks on the table whatever the case may be.
Sadly enough, if these are the standards of the industry, then quite frankly... it leaves no room to even make any arguments. You've simply taken the easier way out and said "okay, tuition centers are bad, because they make students go and study and get into good government universities/public universities, while the government is not taking steps to control them". That's illogical: the whole economy of academic pursuance is based on these "tuition centers" since, frankly, the whole society's an assumptive lot of blind eyed fools; they do not commit themselves to changing academics, and would instead sit in front of the parliament building making pathetic caricatures out of themselves.
And then, well... this bias in showing government colleges are bad is, frankly speaking, an outdated argument. Since even if they complete their education through the tuition center, the government college/school gets the credit.
Highlight how education can be improved instead of why it should be. Qadris and Khans and Sharifs and Zardaris are here to stay, because the education system has not been taken to task. So highlight who are taking it to task, who are helping out, who are making the effort in it instead of whining about it.