A couple of years ago, I saw this man who used to run a small shop of his own and had a house to live in. He had come to my doorstep begging for money. Upon inquiry, I found that he had lost everything to a moneylender. Unable to return a loan, he had to surrender both his business and his home. Later on, I found that this man was not the only one. In fact, he was a small part of a big painful story of the moneylending business in rural areas and newly-developing urban centres. Given the increase in commodity prices and rise in the overall cost of living, poor people are forced to meet their expenses through borrowing.
Roughly, the moneylending business has three identifiable tiers: a) public sector, b) private sector microcredit finance, and c) individual moneylenders. To start with, there is the public sector system of moneylending for agriculture sector. Dispersed mainly by the Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan for buying seeds, pesticides, fertiliser and for meeting related needs, the system is operated through a fairly bureaucratic system that does not necessarily determine if the person borrowing the money is actually using it. Resultantly, the greatest beneficiaries are big capital and large landowners who often use the system to access resources in the name of small farmers they can influence.
The other public sector scheme pertains to Khushhali Bank which is relatively a better option. A microcredit finance bank established by the Government of Pakistan for poverty reduction, it has a better system of moneylending. Money is distributed to a group of people against a plan or a project. Furthermore, a relationship is established over a few years and there is not mark-up.
The second tier pertains to private-sector ventures which have their own set of problems. Although some of the private microcredit banks claim to give small loans to help people start a business, it was found that ultimately, a lot of loan is actually used to meet personal expenditure rather than establish ventures. In rural areas or small towns in particular, representatives of these banks complete the paperwork to offer venture capital which is utilised for other purposes with their knowledge. The only good thing about this scheme is that, ultimately, the borrower has to pay about 20 per cent annual interest rate which is nothing in comparison to what they pay the individual moneylenders. Also, the wiser people can actually benefit and set up ventures through this scheme.
The most extortive tier is the third one at which individual moneylenders give loans to individual borrowers at exorbitantly high rates. For instance, I talked to a woman who had borrowed Rs1,000 at an interest rate of Rs300 per month. Since she could not return the Rs300 in interest in the first month, it added up and was counted as capital to be paid the next month with an additional interest rate. This is a system that perpetuates borrowing and sustains poverty. In this particular case, the borrower was a woman who wanted to satisfy some urgent needs at home like buying clothes for her children for a family wedding. There are other cases where the extortion is even higher. This refers to gamblers as borrowers. A lot of such moneylenders can be found around gambling dens where people can lose money fast and are often in search of quick funding options. There are instances when people, who were already poor, lost everything including close relations like wives and even daughters. This is because if you are unfortunate enough to lose everything you have borrowed, the lender can extract any price or can force the borrower to pay back through selling any precious commodity he owns. Such cases are rarely reported.
These third-tier moneylenders have their own network of people who identify and introduce potential borrowers, and goons that can later help in getting the money back. Given the nature of policing in the country, the police rarely confront these musclemen or the moneylenders. In any case, the local police are often involved in patronising gambling dens and the moneylenders in return for their own cut. The state’s law-enforcement system is completely redundant and in no shape to meet the challenges of internal security, which should not only include traditional crimes like theft, homicide and others but should cater to these new dimensions as well.
Another interesting aspect of this extortive moneylending system is that primarily the rural and urban middle class runs these operations. These are the middle-sized shopkeepers and businessmen who are engaged in this business which is essentially a shareholding venture. The trick is not to lend large amounts but to give relatively small amounts to people who can be chased and coerced easily. The goons who follow the credit-line also get a cut for recovering the money and so does the person who has initially introduced the borrower. What I found even more interesting in my own village was that some of the moneylenders were seemingly god-fearing men who would otherwise lay down people’s lives for not observing religious practices. Surely, money has its own religion.
It is also important to note that this system is not peculiar to one village or town but happens all over the country. This moneylending is lethal as it exacerbates poverty, crime and general misery of the people who get further impoverished due to losing capital and assets. As mentioned earlier, people are known to sell off their assets including (sometimes) their family members, hence the network poaches on individual desperation and turns poverty into a never-ending cycle of life.
This is a time that microcredit finance needs a serious relook and regulation to get rid of those who extort several pounds of flesh.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 10th, 2013.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
"There will certainly come a time for mankind when everyone will take interest, and if he does not do so, its dust will reach him” (Muhammad, Allah's apostle)
"When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes."
"The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks." - Lord Acton
Banking - the BIGGEST scam on earth. The money that we have in our pockets is NOT an ASSET, but DEBT. Its backed by NOTHING. ZILCH! Ever noticed, the banks don't PRINT the 'interest money' that we pay on loans and it doesn't exist in the money circulation. So this modern day interest banking system is DEPRIVING us ALL of our REAL wealth for a piece of WORTHLESS paper called 'money'. MAJOR source of widening the gap b/w have's and have not's. And the intensity of this sin (dealing in interest) can be known through the words of last of God's messenger, Muhammad (pbuh): “The sin of taking riba has 70 parts & the smallest of which is equivalent to a man committing adultery with his own mother.”
In my opinion, its PURE economic terrorism from the banking goons.
There is a saying in Urdu: "zaroratmand dewana hota hai" where needy and impoverish people resort to the modern day shylock(s), without thinking of the consequences, and they trapped in this never ending vicious cycle of poverty and misery. In a country like Pakistan, there's no solutions of such evil extorts, because those who are aware of such problems; they don't have the power to do anything about it, and those, who have the power and will; don't want to address this problem.
@kashif: @Dilip:
The practice of usury , as discussed in this article has nothing to do with Islam and dates back to many ages. It is a scourge of old world and civilizations came out of it through proper planing or revolution.
There is nothing Islamic about this country. It is high time to change the name of this country.
We are all muslims. How can these unislamic tendencies exist in the Islasmic Republc of Pakistan? We must ALL fight this scourge for the benefit of the poor.
@Siddiqui: You have no idea of economics, banking, and monetization of capital. Stop listening to the You Tube nonsense on federal reserve and spend a day with Karachi traders to learn what is commodity and how it is valued and how capital is gained or lost. That will give you an idea of "what is money".
Running a country is no different than running a business. The structure, function, execution and evaluation is exactly the same as any business. Except business is autocratic and country in modern world is autocratic democracy.
There is not enough silver or gold in this world to pay for the labor of the world and my labor is worth more than your gold or silver.
"I do not have gold but my labor and skill and knowledge Is worth more than the gold, and you will make more gold with by knowledge of atoms-now you follow, how money is valued?
Knowledge is money.
With knowledge you can make iPhone or high yielding crops or semi conductors or make things that others need and want more than your gold, make fertilizer out of gas and fly faster than the speed of sound, and explore ocean floors and make life without sperm or egg, defy gravity and go out of this earth where the human civilization was imprisoned forever, break the atom to release energy, make medicines to bring the dead alive, make electricity and make the fire obsolete, make desert into paradise - well you finish it.
Now you know what is money and its value.
@gp65.: Yes, what you say is correct and there are people who pay from 0% -29% based on credit worthiness.
Prudent people have used that free capital and built business around it and /or went to school on credit cards and payed them off. Some swiped them on frivolous purchases and ended in debt also.
The access to capital is necessary to alleviate proverty , either from private or government initiated program sources. The reasons for borrowing from Shylock in developing countries are: (1) the wages are far lower than basic expenditure of life -food, clothing and shelter.No real living wage (2) Not enough charitable remedy when an individual needs one to recuperate; (3) inadequate health care for the poor and high health care cost in private sector; (4) when bread winner dies or incapacitated there is no alternative means of income.;(5) social obligation for frivolous spending, (6) inadequate government capital revenues for distribution of wealth through social program or poor policy and governance.
Many of the old world citizens are indebted with no fault of their own, and the problem is pervasive in rural poor particularly in countries where the predominant economic output is agrarian and the old system of labor and wage is still practiced.
Metaphorically speaking, in developing countries the poor considers a goat or a cow worth more than a child, because the cow feeds the family and when the child dies the entire family weeps a day but when the cow dies the entire family starves forever.
A share crop farmers who borrowed money from Shylock, looses everything when the crop fails due to no fault of his own and there is no effective means to alleviate his debt ( ie. Commodity insurance system from private capital). Government subsides now reduces the available capital pool for social programs ( education and healthcare) and cycle perpetuates.
US was built on borrowed credit, ironically, from merchants of Venice through persuasion of John Adams and PAK had surplus balance of payment in 1947.
The issues discussed by the author are real, but complex to solve, but doable in two generations and even if every middle class PAK wants to give their domestic help living wages, they cannot afford because they themselves do not earn adequate capital from their labor.
All PAK has to do is look east of the border, because they also faced the same problem until 1970s and managed the capital well by nationalizing banks when they needed capital and came out of it when they no longer needed it, as China, Singapore, Malaysia and other countries.
In today's economic system adequate capital is available but PAK is still ill prepared to make use of it.
@John B: "Despite having access to easy capital of $5000 via free credi cards"
The annual fee of those credit cards maybe free but they are not interest free. For people with poor credit history, they likely pay an APR of 28%p.a. on credit cards.
What you narrate here is plain abhorrent. But it is only a tiny fraction of the problem. Its effects are only localised. The far greater problem is the federal reserve. They don't even have to the money to lend, they just create it out of thin air. This money out of thin air gets the value from the devaluing of the currency, in turn stealing from you. That means they aren't actually giving you anything at all. Just laying a claim that you have to pay them for nothing at all. To top that they call it availability of cheap capital and even charge interest on it. Most of our economic problems are result of these crazy Kenysian styled ideas. Cheap capital is not the way to improve an economy. It actually does more harm than good. Cheap capital is the driving force behind consumerism and waster of resources.
Return to a form of money that is something tangible, something that has a worth on its own is only solution. Currency should get their value from the open trading in the market and not set by some bankers who adjust the interest rates. That time doesn't look that far when this system would go down and nothing except gold, silver and food items would be the only acceptable currency. It would be called it the 'West Winter' and would take for only 1 domino to fall. Greece and Spain looks most vulnerable.
Always nice to read your op-ed's. Thank you for your thought provoking short pieces!
What is said is absolutely true and had been the practice of time immemorial. One can see the laws of money lending in Hamurabi's codified laws. The practice was so rampant in middle ages that usury was considered sin, and what is happening here is typical usury, not interest, as prohibited by Islam.
Credit has a major role to play in the betterment of lives of all as long as it is well regulated and monitored. Both Money lent to extract a pound of flesh and culture of borrowing to meet social obligation are a failed system. Shylock's thrive when access to easy capital is hard to come by and as long as there is a borrower.
British records show that agriculture money was lent at 35-50% interest rate and by the local land lords since Mogul's time ( no records of earlier times, must be the same) and there was not a set rate or system. It took them a while to bring in cheap credit through well regulated banking and they were successful in some provinces, but unsuccessful in others.
On the other side of the coin, if the borrower agrees to pay the interest for the money he/she borrows then the borrower is bound by it. We don't default on bank loans, so why it should be a different story to the Shylock?
All contracts have to be mutually beneficial, done in good faith, and thus the pound of flesh is not a good contract and hence the shylock system of usury is not only unethical but also against the contract law.
The system can only be abolished when there is surplus capital from other sources, thus making access to capital cheaper than Shylock's terms. Governments do not have the surplus capital, but may enact a regulated system.
Despite having access to easy capital of $5000 via free credi cards, many poor Americans do visit Shylock's in the US also i(pay day lenders) and pay about 40% interest (may be more) but the system is tightly regulated and many Shylock's went out of business.
Abolishing lending, even from Shylock's is bad, if an alternative system is not in place. The microcredit financing in many African countries and in Bangladesh and in India is doing well.
It is not an easy problem to solve in present economic system of PAK.