Radicalisation of the young

Radicalisation is one way the poor and dispossessed find voice as it demands action to challenge the status quo.


M Zaidi January 07, 2013
The writer is a PhD in Conflict Studies and a security analyst

Religion is often unthinkingly invoked as the paramount disposing factor radicalising Pakistan, without taking into account the fact that issues of terrorism and extremism do not arise merely from ideology, backward thinking and lack of education. Rather, the problems that Pakistan is confronted with arise from fundamental socio-economic and class inequalities, which have allowed the ruling classes to espouse, promote and encourage orthodox, rigid and fundamentalist versions of religion, as opposed to the more tolerant, peaceful ones that the dispossessed classes reflect. As Pakistan redefined its identity by invoking the Arabian origins of Islam during the Afghan jihad heydays, the relatively more tolerant, syncretic and peaceful versions of South Asian religion have been increasingly replaced by harsh, literalist and bland versions of Arabian Islam amongst an extremist fringe. This did not affect all classes homogenously but had a more observable effect on Pakistan's youth. This youth bulge of Pakistan’s population between ages 15-24 is estimated at 36 million, while a staggeringly high number of 58 million individuals are below the age of 15. Together, these statistics are nearly 60 per cent of Pakistan’s total population, a proportion that is only second to Yemen, with the added variable of Pakistan having a male cohort that is larger than its female counterpart. This is particularly relevant in the sense that the literature on youth radicalisation is focused almost solely on males. Even though fertility rates in the country have decreased modestly, a current rate of 3.8 births per female will carry Pakistan’s youth bulge well beyond 2025, giving a projected estimate of Pakistan’s population under the age of 24 to be 51.4 per cent of the total in 2030.

This demographic trajectory allows young Pakistanis to be swayed towards radicalisation and adds support for militant agendas from among the Pakistani populace, particularly when there is high unemployment and income disparity. This income disparity has manifested itself in the ratio of the highest to the lowest income quintiles ranging from 3.76 in 2001 to 4.15 in 2005, and further to 4.2 in 2005-06. Since poorer households in Pakistan tend to have a higher number of children on average, especially in rural areas, this implies that an exceptionally large number of young men and women are being forced to live below or around the poverty line. Furthermore, at least one tenth of the rural communities do not even have access to basic facilities, which adds incremental stress to an already overburdened economy. The children who come from these families are the ultra-poor who seem destined to have a grim future, particularly with regard to employment. The high level of underemployment for the young from lower socio-economic classes causes an escalating strain. While the growing economy has expanded the labour market and the unemployment rate has declined to around 5.32 per cent, the modest improvement cannot cope with the rapidly expanding youth bulge. This alienates the poor segment of the youth bulge, since the majority of non-elite young men can only find relatively menial, unfulfilling jobs. Since the richest 20 per cent of the population is continuing to grow richer, the sense of alienation among the poor young men is not surprising and forces them to look for other alternatives.

Radicalisation is one of the ways that the poor and the dispossessed find voice, since the path to radicalisation demands action to challenge the status quo, often in the form of violent activism. This violent action may become terrorism in its extreme manifestations, or smolder within the non-elite youth in the form of extremism. As research reveals, there are different trajectories to determinant variables of extremism and terrorism in different theatres. This may very well be the case in Pakistan where poverty, rather than educational attainment, may be a radicalising factor. It is also debatable that even employed persons may be facing crippling poverty in some areas of Pakistan, particularly the tribal areas. It seems that a majority of young men from rural backgrounds can only find relatively menial jobs.  Over time, the private sector’s already constrained capacity to accommodate the youth cohort in employment is shrinking even more. Even though there has been some improvement in the macroeconomic structure of the country, it is inadequate to keep pace with the growth of the youth cohort, which is one of the largest in the world, assessed by international comparison of youth, including children, as a percentage of overall population. Either way, policymakers would avoid the socio-economy of youth radicalisation in Pakistan at their own peril.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 8th, 2013.

COMMENTS (11)

Truthbetold | 11 years ago | Reply

@Mujeeb ur Rehman Nizamani:

Excellent post.

"Pakistan as a country faces the identity crisis since its inception and especially since 1971 this crisis started to manifest in more radicalised form, when Bhutto ironically banished Ahmedis from the fold of Islam. This was the point where religion became mouthpiece for the politics and we all know what followed since then. The text books being taught in schools till to date are the tools of that prevalent radicalization"

On this, I would add that Pakistan's identity crisis and radicalization started in 1947 and not 1971. When religion is used as the basis for dividing people and partitioning a country, one can't get away from religious dogmas and obscurantism from controlling the population's ethos and identity, As a consequence, religion would be used by the power brokers to control the minds of the population through brainwashing and propaganda.

Truthbetold | 11 years ago | Reply

This is a totally naive, misplaced and wrong analysis by the author.

" issues of terrorism and extremism do not arise merely from ideology, backward thinking and lack of education. Rather, the problems that Pakistan is confronted with arise from fundamental socio-economic and class inequalities, which have allowed the ruling classes to espouse, promote and encourage orthodox, rigid and fundamentalist versions of religion, as opposed to the more tolerant, peaceful ones that the dispossessed classes reflect"

Many polls have shown that over 78% of Pakistanis hold the view that strict anti-human Sharia laws that belong in the 14th century must be made compulsory. Moreover, most global terrorists have been from the middle class or rich Muslim groups. There are many countries that are dirt poor but the people there don't wage a global jihad like in Pakistan and other Muslim countries.

"As Pakistan redefined its identity by invoking the Arabian origins of Islam during the Afghan jihad heydays, the relatively more tolerant, syncretic and peaceful versions of South Asian religion have been increasingly replaced by harsh, literalist and bland versions of Arabian Islam amongst an extremist fringe."

While the author is correct in that the old Islam such as Sufism, practiced in South Asia, has been of the more benign kind, how can he dismiss the Arabian Islam as the extreme one? Sufism at its core has borrowed the mystical and philosophical aspects of Hinduism. So, how can he conclude that it is the correct Islam and that the Arabian Islam is the wrong one?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ