‘Haji the hero’: the great American ‘debt-berg’

Afghan contractors who, despite putting their lives on the line by working for Americans, are continually exploited.


Zahrah Nasir December 25, 2012
The writer is author of The Gun Tree: One Woman’s War (Oxford University Press, 2001) and lives in Bhurban

As unpaid bills amounting to millions or perhaps even billions of dollars pile up from one end of Afghanistan to the other, the rapid decline of American popularity in this country of seemingly eternal warfare and civil strife is clearly understandable.

“The American government owes me $1.3 million for completed work,” complains one Afghan contractor hired to construct specialised facilities in one of the huge American bases scarring the hostile landscape. “Payment was due 14 months ago but not a single dollar has come through. I have had to sell some prime property in Kabul, along with some machinery, so I can pay off my own local suppliers so that they, in turn, can pay their own people who simply cannot afford to wait any longer for their dues.”

This complaint is just the tip of the great American outstanding ‘debt-berg’ and it is echoed over and over again by local contractors who, despite putting their lives on the line by working for Americans, are continually exploited.

Obtaining lucrative American contracts was, not so very long ago, the dream of Afghan contractors who queued up in droves to bid for construction and other project work associated first with the establishment and then with the expansion of American bases from which armies of occupation attempt to enforce their own version of stability as war machine profits mount up back home.

As the occupation drags on and is scaled either up or down according to White House decrees and American perceived necessity, so, too, does the anger of Afghan contractors and those in their direct and indirect employ escalate. This anger and disgust at American duplicity is one of the few things that actively trickles down to a surprising number of the Afghan population as contractors and their employees all have extended families to support and all belong to various increasingly dissatisfied tribes who, in the long years of war, have already lost so much.

A limited number of affected contractors have attempted to get their dues via American courts of law but the cost is prohibitive and cases drag on for years.

Others tackle this highly volatile issue via the Afghan legal system which has countless drawbacks of its own and others yet race from pillar to post trying to figure out what to do.

One Afghan contractor, though, has unsurprisingly under the circumstances taken the law into his own hands and used the very same heavy machinery and equipment whose hire charges of $300,000 remain unpaid after seven months of entreaties to actually barricade a project operated by the American company. Working out of a heavily fortified American base in Helmand province, the contractor has managed to bring on-site operations to a grinding halt, sending those who owe him money into paroxysms of volcanic rage in the process.

Immediately after manoeuvring his barricade into place last week, ‘Haji the Hero’, as he is known, did an eminently sensible thing. After informing the American company concerned that the barricade will be removed after he receives his dues in cash, in hand, he has disappeared into the Afghan tribal labyrinth where, win or lose his audacious gamble, he most certainly has a tale to tell.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 26th, 2012.

COMMENTS (8)

p r sharna | 11 years ago | Reply

@Afghani: @ P R Sharma Why don’t you try and get a contract from Nato, Please do en-light us when you get your payment.Ground reality should be accepted, US should make the payments to our poor contractors.

Your post indicates the grievance/irritation and some frustration for non payment to contractors ( irrespective it they are poor or rich) There can be no denial that a contract if completed as per the term of contract deserve to be paid within the prescribed time frame. NATO / USA / European employers / organisations do not have any record in the past of violating/ non payment of legitimate due to supplier / contractor. There may be a dispute or lack of understanding in the terms and this aspect is silent in the article.

Afghani | 11 years ago | Reply

@IceSoul Cheating? These are legally awarded contracts and one has to pay when the work is done. Please be clear US was not invited by us, we are not the free labour/ slaves for them.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ