Gilgit-Baltistan unrest: Amidst tense calm, public transport banned on key highway

Four suspects were arrested after two people killed earlier this week.


Shabbir Mir December 20, 2012

GILGIT:


A day after two people were killed in a spate of sectarian violence in Gilgit city on Tuesday, police arrested four suspects and banned public transport on Karakoram Highway for security reasons.


“Action against the troublemakers is on as we have arrested four suspects so far,” Deputy Inspector General Police Ali Sher told The Express Tribune.

Traffic remained thin on the roads, though schools and offices were open on Wednesday. The ban imposed on motorcycles last week remained in force. The administration also banned the entry of pickups in the city to ensure peace. “A high-level meeting has decided that a ban should be imposed on pickups,” said an official.

As part of security measures, the government banned public transport between Gilgit and Rawalpindi via Karakoram Highway. “We have been asked not to run public transport buses on the highway for security reasons,” said Ehsan Shah, a spokesperson for the government-sponsored Natco bus service.

Meanwhile, Chief Minister Mehdi Shah said extremists would not be allowed to “hijack” the city. “Those challenging the writ of the government will be taken to task,” read a statement issued by the Chief Minister Secretariat.

Shah blamed the violence on a lack of development in the region and said short- and long-term strategies would be prepared to counter sectarianism in the region. “I appeal to people to identify those involved in sectarianism and terrorism,” he said.

Last

Tuesday’s deaths occurred when two passenger pickups were attacked by armed men in separate incidents. Three were also wounded in the attacks. Meanwhile, another man who was injured in a university clash last week also died on Tuesday, after succumbing to his injuries. “Zameer Abbas died of his wounds, while the two others were killed in separate incidents,” SSP Muhammad Ali Zia told The Express Tribune.

Last week, two rival groups of university students clashed, leaving two men dead and seven injured. The incident led to the imposition of Section 144, which bars the assembly of five or more people in one place.

Chairman of the G-B Public Accounts Committee Syed Raziuddin Rizvi linked Tuesday’s violence to the students clash, saying the university’s Vice Chancellor (VC) Dr Najma Najam created a rift between students from Shia and Sunni communities by denying permission for a religious event on the campus.

“The G-B Assembly speaker and deputy speaker’s unjustifiable support to the VC has reignited sectarian violence in the town,” he told The Express Tribune by phone from Islamabad.

Another lawmaker, Didar Ali, the former president of Anjuman-e-Imamia, said that the clash between two student groups was “engineered” to “facilitate” the escape of high-profile prisoners from a local jail.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 20th, 2012.

COMMENTS (20)

Aly shafa | 11 years ago | Reply

All these unrest activities are planned to make the region a security zone to tighten the grip of establishment to continue their well full decision on the GB, people has been divide by Establishment for this purpose through full support to a group of people , Law and order has no values, few local people who have prime role in extremism don't trust local security agencies they want rangers and FC who are the main source of tension in the region, they are just their to take good salaries and peace allowances from the GB budget, why not GB scouts given power to dealt with, police is working in a limited power,what these rangers and FC did yet for the peace except add fuel to the burning fire, why not majority given chance to work for peace , only these imposed decision can work for peace? establishment should re-think its decision and partnership with wrong people otherwise very soon no one will be their to think GB was once part of Pakistan? wise decision to understand changing situation, let the peace to work free of conspiracies behind the walls, it has been used for more than 4 decades and thousands lost life Pakistan lost real sympathies from the region,

Ali | 11 years ago | Reply

@Allama…..Dear do you know anything about Taqiyyah in light of Islamic jurisprudence (at least some know how about……..) Your antithetical arguments must have some credential grounds to prove your point of view. Secondly Arab- Persian rivalry is an outdated theory. It has start with the inception of Khomeinism and subsequent revolution in Persia, and ended with emergence of Persia as a regional hegemonic power in the Persian Gulf and Arab world. Most importantly, the Persians have never considered their Arab brothers to be their rivals; rather their focus is towards Zionists. We must avoid such discussion which creates gulf among the Muslims (brothers) sects, in spite of such unproductive discussion we must find ways for reconciliation of Muslims to strengthen Islamic Ummah and its regeneration.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ