Emraan Hashmi gets first priority for Karan Johar’s film

Ekta and Karan want to cast a big name opposite Emraan.


News Desk December 19, 2012
Emraan Hashmi gets first priority for Karan Johar’s film



Ever since directors-producers Karan Johar and Ekta Kapoor teamed up with actor Emraan Hashmi for a film, they have been busy scouting for a leading lady.

Initially, reports had suggested that Kareena Kapoor was offered the role, but then she apparently turned it down. For some time, Deepika Padukone had been finalised for the part as well. Now, we’re told that the makers are yet to confirm any actor, reports the Hindustan Times.


The reason Ekta and Karan are finding it so hard to settle on a name is because they have a strict condition for any actor they approach for this film — she will have to adjust her dates to match Emraan’s. The film will be directed by Karan Johar’s former assistant director, Akshay Roy.

An industry insider reveals, “It’s a mass-oriented film, and Karan and Ekta consider Emraan their trump card. He fits the role perfectly, so they don’t want to take any chances when it comes to casting, which is why they are in no rush to pick the female lead.” The fact that the schedules of most A-list actors, Deepika, Kareena, Katrina Kaif and Priyanka Chopra, are packed next year, also seems to be adding to the delay. “Ekta and Karan want to cast a big name opposite Emraan,” adds the insider.

As of now, the film is expected to hit screens mid-next year.

Emraan, meanwhile, has reiterated his commitment to this project by turning down two big offers. “The makers don’t want to jeopardise his dates because it would be very unethical on their part. He is a good actor and Ekta is very fond of him,” an insider told the Hindustan Times.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 20th, 2012.

Like Life & Style on Facebook and follow at @ETLifeandStyle for the latest in fashion, gossip, entertainment

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ