Here, I would like to refer to three books. One, by former prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (The Myth of Independence), the second by Dr Ishrat Hussain (Economy of an Elitist State) and the third by my friend Shahidur Rehman (Sovereignty Lost). Read together, one gets an inkling of what really afflicted us in the very first few years of independence. Our ruling elite, made up of landed aristocracy, civil-military bureaucracy and big business simply guzzled rapaciously the ‘easy money’ coming in from all directions. Soon, there emerged in our country two Pakistans — one, of the ruling elite with a First World lifestyle to maintain, and the other of the ruled poor, belonging to the have-nots of the Third World. Since then, the ruling elite have been making rules to promote and protect private profits at the cost of public interest.
Already, our defence budgets were being taken care of under the CENTO and SEATO pacts with tanks and fighter aircraft coming in mostly free of cost. We were renting out our bases and our armed forces to the so-called Free World engaged in a cold war. Even the proceeds from the sale of PL480 wheat were used for budget balancing. So, with both the economic and defence parts of the budget being taken care of by foreign dole, there was no compulsion on the part of the ruling elite to part with even a minuscule portion of their unearned incomes by way of income tax. Borrowing soon became a habit. This is how we ended up being a nation without what is called the tax culture.
Most of the incomes accruing to the members of this privileged class were, in fact, unearned as investments were being arranged for them on a 30:70 basis with banks providing the larger shares. They would recover their own share at one go by over-invoicing the machinery imported for the venture. And even before the venture would come on stream, they would skim off millions in unearned profits by manoeuvering to depress the value of shares of the venture and buying them back for next to nothing. The PIDC was also helping out by launching lucrative ventures and then selling them to people with contacts and influence at throwaway prices. It was the age of licences and permits. Evacuee property was being distributed among the influential, adding one more grasping dimension to the ongoing corruption. In addition, the big business kept upping their margins by stealing water, electricity and gas and exploiting labour to the hilt. Their inefficient and low quality produce was being protected by very high tariffs walls. Cartels and monopolies followed. Bhutto nationalised but Ziaul Haq gave them back to his political constituency against bank loans allowed without any collaterals.
Corruption silently eats into the vitals of non-democratic, closed societies. Matters come to a head only when there is nothing left on the plate to siphon off. That is what has happened in our case after the three extended military rules. There is not much left to loot. During the first Afghan war, according to a rough estimate, we received about 50 billion unencumbered dollars. However, when Zia died, there was nothing on the ground to show where all that manna had gone. In open societies where democracy and market economy function side by side, corruption makes a lot of noise and becomes a sexy topic of debate in the media, in parliament and in the courts of law. That is what is happening in our country today. But beyond catharsis, such debates accomplish nothing much. And in due course of time, the ruling elite succeed in buying off the debate and then it is, once again, business as usual.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 19th, 2012.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Zainab:
"Solution???"
No one except Taliban, of any variety, will venture to answer that.
Solution???
What a timely, balanced and truthful Op Ed by the editor of ET, thanks for that. You write “business kept upping their margins by stealing water, electricity and gas and exploiting labour" The businesses have been robbing people with fake baby formula, faulty medicines, adulterated food, no taxes by showing no profits since 1947 or before. These social evils are not taught by new leaders or Mr. Jinnah but it is in our very fabric of the society. I was a witness at a gathering of Pakistanis where the ex-chairman of house sub-committee on s. Asia said "in first 7 years after 9/11 we gave $14 billion to Pakistan. Half went to the army and half to Mush's pocket". No country from B. Desh to Indonesia to Malaysia does not receive this kind of money and it never reaches the public. With so much talk and hatred about the corruption and every civilian govt it is best that West stops all cash aid. They should only make schools, hospitals, power plants and other infrastructure for public. We need food and goods for public consumption and not cash for arms and DHA.
Do we have any problem other than corruption.How far corruption stories are credibles when sources revealing corruption scandals are in itself highly doubtfull.Isn't it a most favourit and easily available tool in the hand of power seekers.History of power struggle in Pakistan clearly shows that indeed, term corruption has been widely used as politicle weapons.That is the reason much of the corruption cases have ended in nothing but general pardon.This general pardon had in turn resulted in great confusions and distrust in masses.This creation of distrust and confusion is itself a big crime on the part of those who first started it.They should have appologised to the nation for wrong informations or wrong allegations.But in this country there is no such trend that means, lack of moral values.That also means corruption allegation is a big black mailing business in this country.In media,for example,there is a new trend of investigation journalism,what happened afterwards,many guys who starte their journey as mediocre journalist with a cheap motorcycle ended up with millions Rs worth bangalows and very expensive motor cars.How is it possible accept that one think as money making through black mail business.Now there is another dirty trend of tv channels reporters making films on poor quaks,prostitutes openly hummilating them on tv channels.Which law allow them to take law in their hands. I know prostitution is not a good profession or quaks are not a right solution but,self respect comes before every thing.Wher is going this investigation journalism?