William Milan, a scholar who lived in Pakistan before the Afghan war days, said that analysts primarily understand Pakistan through Afghanistan and in the context of ‘security’ issues, they don’t know its history. Still, I was shocked to meet a young member of the Foreign Relations Committee of the US Congress who remarked that nothing substantive had happened over the last four years in Pakistan. I immediately responded, “all of our political parties came to a consensus agreement on amending over 100 clauses of our Constitution, with major positive implications on our democratic structure. Wouldn’t you consider that substantive”? No, he didn’t.
However, it is not just Americans who see Pakistan in a bad light. It has become all too easy for Pakistanis to blame one another or, most conveniently, blame the “corrupt politicians” for all our sins. But in so doing, we all contribute directly to the negative image of our country, creating the impression that no one in their right mind should have anything to do with us. Having stamped ourselves as a terrorist nation and a security threat to the world, we are moving towards diplomatic suicide.
Unfortunately, complaining and self-pity has become a part of our national psyche, sprinkled with a defeatist attitude that nothing can work in this country and topped with a tendency to pull anyone down who tries to make an effort. These characteristics clearly distinguish us from other nationalities who work very hard to promote the interests of their countries, especially when outside their country.
“The Israeli lobby in the US is considered to be the most effective in ensuring the interests of their country”, said a lawyer during a seminar. Another policy expert said, “the problem with the Pakistani diaspora is that most do not lobby for their country; they are too fragmented by their party rivalries back home.” Some politicians on their visits to America only run down the current system in order to raise funds for themselves. At times, senior officials from the establishment overplay the negatives to make the bureaucracy seem more important. The civil society also has a tendency to overplay negative issues as that attracts attention and funding. The cannibal tribes of the Pacific and the terrorists of Pakistan make equally sensational headlines. As a result, we have created such a market for negative news that anything positive doesn’t sell anymore. We do not have to be in denial about our problems but we need to learn how to share them in a way that builds solidarity with our struggles rather than contempt for our limitations.
Irfan Malik, a Pakistani-American heading a US-Pakistan foundation, released a study on the Pakistani diaspora at the Wilson Centre. He shared that Pakistani-Americans are more engaged in raising funds to support social causes in Pakistan. He added, “politically, they contribute to the US political campaigns and have good links with many key politicians but they have still not been able to influence the political agenda to benefit Pakistan”. We, as a nation, have to understand that our image in the world needs to be improved. India has deep poverty, religious fundamentalism and extensive social problems. Yet, it is consistently seen in a positive light because Indians consistently promote their national interests over local political affiliations.
We can tell many stories of communities creating innovative solutions. We have examples of legislation that no one else in South Asia has. Our political parties jointly made our Election Commission stronger. We have a government that has just completed its five-year term and we are moving towards a smooth transfer of power. A good starting point can be to begin respecting ourselves, our country and positive initiatives that people take. The solidarity displayed by the international community on Malala Yousufzai’s stance is an example of how we can tell the story of the hundreds of people who resist militancy in Pakistan every day. We have to tell our positive stories and avoid running ourselves down. With all the challenges we face at home, we don’t need the entire world against us.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 8th, 2012.
COMMENTS (36)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
so beautifully written! you are an awesome writer and your book taboo one of my favourites by far! you are also my aunt's first cousin ;) nasreen .. and have met you as well .. but wanted to tell you i really enjoy following you on twitter!
@MSS: . Sorry dude, she can't help it. She is a PPPite.
"We have a government that has just completed its five-year term and we are moving towards a smooth transfer of power."
That is the bragging point? Oh Dear.
All Parties have agreed to amend the constitution.... to get every MNA off the hook. PM defies the SC openly, now that takes the cake. Then of course many prominent people who headed the nuclear establishment crowing that cars can run on water, now that says a lot. Finally Malala is a great girl but look what made her famous. A shot fired by extremists. The author has good intentions but is low on the fuel, the correct type.
Indians and Pakistanis share not only a border but much more, culture, language, attitudes, you can come up with a long list. How come India with its population 6 to 7 times that of Pakistan, has a lesser number of its citizen caught at the international entry points with fake travel documents, comparatively?.
Gp65
You missed it - focus on fire...
Lady Get Real! Stop living in Cuckoo Land. Come & live in PK & you will smell blood, blasts, protests, killings, etc
ET: Many of my posts are being filtered today even when I am responding to comments directed to me. Please let this one through because the person below has mentioned something untrue - that Shabana and Javed intended to leave India and emigrate to Pakistan. They are proud Indian citizens and the clips below will prove that. Please allow.
@Milestogo: "Shabana azmi had decided to move to Pakistan after she was denied a flat that she wanted to buy in Mumbai. She would have set Pakistan on ‘fire’ with her great performances but for some reason she did not move – not sure what happened…"
Making stuff are we? Here is the interview with Karan Thapar where thie flat issue was mentioned. Look at the statements right before and right after that statement from 5:47 to 7:11 the end of the tape. The optimism in India shines through even as she acknowledges the problems. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeVzsG2VC_o
Also earlier in the same interview in she says " Muslims have a stake and a space in India's democracy and they are better off than the West. Listen to 3:22-4:12 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRiYjYU0M4A
Overall, it was a balanced interview where she pointed to problems on both sides and what could be done to improve communal harmony. She also came down heavily on Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid for trying to encourage Indian Muslims to go to jihad in Afghanistan. All of this is ignored and people in Pakistan latch onto one statement.
@Khalq e Khuda: "So take your jibberish elsewhere, last time I check India was still in third world." When was the last time you checked and where? in your Urdu newspapers? Get a life.
@Alamgir: "liberal fascist Pakistanis join with you Indians in spoiling international image of Pakistan." What is a liberal fascist? From your spewings, you must be one of the die hard right wing fascist Pakistani who sees the whole world through the lens of a rabid distorted veiw of others who fortunately are not Wahabi Muslims.
We truly need an Islamic welfare society...
Shabana azmi had decided to move to Pakistan after she was denied a flat that she wanted to buy in Mumbai. She would have set Pakistan on 'fire' with her great performances but for some reason she did not move - not sure what happened...
Another Wing nut ! The lady should probably stick to writing about the field she is working in
@nathan:
"Why do Pakistanis have to bring in India every time?." Good question, but you will not succeed in getting an answer or convincing these hard-core brainwashed Pakistanis (in America, we call them cave-people living in a stone age). From the psychoanalytical standpoint, I would say that the author of this op-ed piece (which is based on old prejudices and envy) has subconsciously used India as a benchmark to assess Pakistan's progress. After all, you can't expect Pakistanis to compare themselves with Bangladesh because that country, after breaking away from a repressive state in the west, has progressed very well and even overtaken Pakistan in terms of GDP and other attributes. One of my Pakistani friends, a tolerant and modern-thinking guy, says that everytime a Pakistani criticizes India, it is not because he loathes India but because he wishes that he could get the same treatment as Indians do. The criticism reeks of envy and jealousy, based on the aspiration (but not achievement) of "being as good as them". Paradoxical, isn't it? But that's the nature and the psychology of the beast. Pakistan has been hitting the headlines worldwide for all the wrong reasons; unlike the Indian diaspora, which despite its differences, performs fairly well in a united way, also has the power and clout to influence local decision-making people, as is evident in the USA where it is highly respected. Talk about Pakistan and you will see how they begin to squirm. Yes, Indians defecate in the open because it has huge sanitation needs which cannot be met overnight. But so do millions of Pakistanis. What justification do they have? Are these people to be blamed or the rulers (and now you have the hateful and terribly parochial mullahs to add more fuel to an already ravaging fire). The lady author fails to mention that because she has what we call selective amnesia. She also does not say that Pakistan is the cradle of terrorism!
@javid: With all their money and skills and cunning, don't the Jews have anything better to do than create a bad image of Pakistan ? You are not that important..you know...it is Pakistan that creates a bad image for itself, with its own actions...don't blame the Jews, the Americans, The Indians. Next you will blame the Martians, and Andomedans...
I don't think it is India that creates a bad image of Pakistan I think it it is the Jews. The Jews have the money and the skills and the cunning which the Indians don't have.
@Khalq e Khuda: Sure India is definitely in the third world - when did I say it wasn't. The difference between an Indian and a Pakistani in the same gutter is than while the Indian sees the Stars above and tries to get out; the Pakistani wallows in the filth below and tries to pull the Indian down.
Its hilarious to see Pakistanis think that you can improve the image by "projecting a better image". Like using a better light/screen/projector/chairs, etc.. No it is not the projection...it is the content of the movie that is bad...and that won't improve, without investing in education, jobs, economy, exports, and a purposeful anti-terrorists effort. When you promote sectarianism at home, and export terrorism abroad, not much the overseas Pakistanis can do. They want to hide.
Author. If we have to drag India in every debate on our domestic issues then let us see what India's constitution says right of freedom of expression for every indian without cast creed colour,race faiths.State must protect these basic rights of every citizen-Secular constittution. Pakistan constitution says state will decide who is muslim and who is not.Second it says if someone doesn't accept state definetion of religion it will face punishment.Thousands are in pakistani jails for not accepting states definetion.Fascist constitution. In India state tries to help victoms of attrocities commited by rightwingers. In Pakistan state helps right wingers commiting attrocities in the 'good spirit' of miti-pao. What should we tell to the world? let us continue with this shamefull practise of miti-pao-To convert neagative picture into positive involves chemical reactions not good diplomacy.
So now Pakistan's bad image is because expat Pakistanis are not lobbying hard enough on Capitol Hill, or highlighting the oh-so-many wonderful aspects of Pakistan that will make people wonder why they were worried about the country in the first place. Why blame them, madam? They are ashamed to lie, so they lie still. The solidarity displayed by the international community on Malala Yousufzai’s stance is an example of how we can tell the story of the hundreds of people who resist militancy in Pakistan every day. Highlighting Malala's courageous stand also brings the spotlight on the fact that she got shot in the head by Islamic fundamentalists who run amok in your country - why that would make anyone think differently of Pakistan escapes me, while the painful irony of it seems to escape our writer. We have examples of legislation that no one else in South Asia has. So true! Blasphemy laws for example - apparently 600 people have been charged under these laws just in the last 5 years.
Where is ths religious fundamentalism that seems to be at par with Pakistan in India? Which religious groups are killing "other" and their own in India? The answer is none. But making false comparisons with Inda is a feeble attempt by the guilty to seek parity where none exists in reality.
Well said, we need to improve our policies it should be done as first priority....
Pakistan will earn the respect of global community when it can walk the talk. The Military must stop patronizing terror group, Parliamentarians must start taking the hard decisions to put the country back on the rails and the Judiciary must stop going after ideological opponents and target criminals and terrorists.
Pakistan is seen as a country posing a terror threat to its neighbors, the region at large and the World in general. The proliferation of Nuclear weapons technology unfortunately cannot be washed away with good PR. Claiming to be a victim of terrorism without showing the will to dismantle the terror infrastructure, ban hate speeches or reform the Education system -- portrays comfort with the status quo. The people must take responsibility for their own actions and believe they alone can build a better tomorrow --- waiting for a Messiah is a sign of shirk and an exercise in escapism. Analysts like Irfan Malik are naive to be comparing India and Pakistan, a fairer comparison would be with Saudi Arabia and Iran since like Pakistan Religion there has been used as a tool to dominate and suppress the minorities and masses in general.
The only thing to commend the Indians on is the ability to paint such a rosy picture of their country and completely white wash all the problems the country faces. Frankly speaking, If India was such a great secular state, Shabana Azmi would be allowed to buy a house any where she pleases. The Muslims and Christians in India are treated like dirt and are not given any rights short of some charity quotas. The caste system subjugates the masses and issues such as the Gujrat Pogrom and Babri Masjid and others constant. Terrorism is rife, with over 22 armed insurgencies in the country. Lets be realistic here and call a spade a spade.
Why do Pakistanis have to bring in India every time?. It is juvenile. A case in point is the hockey team captain saying . "So what if we did badly? we defeated India". Are Pakistanis taught to compare themselves with and hate India from their childhood textbooks? If we talk like this how can anybody respect us or even take us seriously. It is nauseating.
This is the second article in the last few days that all it takes is good PR. I don't know about PR but the authors need to see a psychiatrist.
Nathan
The mature thing to do is to stop worrying about what anybody else says about any country or even a person. All of us in South Asia are lands of contradictions any generalisation and any example can be countered with counter example. We ourselves do not fully understand our culture and society leave alone the foreigners, be they scholars or tourists. Leave it to diplomats to explain any country's policies, have more people to people exchanges, tourism, scholarships and fellowships etc. depending on your financial capacity to understand.
Try to solve the social, economic and political problems we face with hard work and persistence. When positive results start coming from them then we will also have a better self image leave alone the rest of the world about us. Under British colonialism we have been brain washed to hate ourselves and worship all that is European. If we overcome this Euro-centrism in our outlook and be objective about our own selves, history, philosophy and culture, then we will be far more confident and balanced and not craving for certificates from some one else. The entire south Asia faces this. So let us fix our problems.
If some one wants to help us in that well and good if not we have to do it ourselves. There is no other choice. A bright idea or thought can come from anywhere from our present or past or from any other society and culture. Let us accept it if it helps us fix a problem not just in the short term but also in the long term. We have an at least 8 thousand year old civilisation (if you include Mehrgarh, Baloochistan). We have struggled with nature and with each other and found a certain balance and perspective, why do we (majority of south asians) have such a low self image of ourselves? cheers SK, Mumbai
"William Milan, a scholar who lived in Pakistan before the Afghan war days, said that analysts primarily understand Pakistan through Afghanistan and in the context of ‘security’ issues, they don’t know its history."
William certainly did not Pakistan's history but a sizeable amount of pakistanis don't know Pakistan's history.
Couldnt agree more with the writer. Pakistanis economy did not collapse during a disastrous global period, joblessness rate remained in control, the stock markets remained high, the retail spending jumped, cars and motor cycles increased but all Pakistanis portray specially our journalists who write in foreign newspaper is doom and gloom.
@Arindom: jeez, insecurity much? The writer quoted India very rightly, there is a huge darkside to India, the thing difference is that India is on the right path and so has been Pakistan for past four years. So take your jibberish elsewhere, last time I check India was still in third world.
@Alamgir: "In many ways Pakistan is better than India but that doesn’t come out because liberal fascist Pakistanis join with you Indians in spoiling international image of Pakistan."
Please give some examples where Pakistan is better than India in terms that are relevant to the other countries. IF more Indians openly defecate compared to Pakistan that makes no difference to foreigners. But if terror emanating from Pakistan kills their citizens - it DOES make a difference to them. In a separate post I have listed the ways in which people of other countries experience India and make up their own minds instead of relying upon media spin.
By the way liberal fascist is an oxymoron. Please look up all 3 words in a dictionary i.e. liberal, fascist and oxymoron. Oh and the ones spoiling the image of Pakistan are not liberals who report the bad news but the extremists who create the bad news. The day you realize this, you will be on the path to recovery.
@arindom: You are missing the point. In many ways Pakistan is better than India but that doesn't come out because liberal fascist Pakistanis join with you Indians in spoiling international image of Pakistan.
Worth repeating.
Stop dragging India into your sorry state. India is seen positively due to secularism, democracy, peaceful diversity and focus on economic development.
"India has deep poverty, religious fundamentalism and extensive social problems. Yet, it is consistently seen in a positive light because Indians consistently promote their national interests over local political affiliations".
India does have some fringe bigots but overall there is communal harmony - so I do not think the accusation of religious fundamentalism applies. Ofcourse it has deep povery and extensive social problems which India or Indians do not try to hide. But dozens more countries have that and that gets no attention. I think the key reason India is seen differently from Pakistan is because of the personal experience that people have of India/Indians via: 1) Millions of expatriate Indians that are well assimilated in the respective countries 2) India's cultural/entertainment products that they experience in their own coutnry : e.g. Bollywood, yoga, "curry", IPL, Indian TV shows 3) India's economic integration with the world in the last 2 decades which makes people associate India with : generic pharmaceuticals, IT/ business process outsourcing, Tata Nano 4) TOurism: When people visit Taj Mahal, the Rajasthani palaces, the cathedrals and beaches of Goa, the backwaters of Kerala, the temples in SOuth, the Buddhist circuit - they experience the country with all its color, diversity and hospitality despite the very visible poverty. This has been possible because we have not disowned any part of our heritage. Ofcourse medical tourism is also a growing reason for people to isit India and that too builds goodwill for a cuontry that helped them in the journey to restore health
The one thing that India does not have is - terrorism emanating from its soil impacting any other country. In typical tit for tat fashion, Pakistan unconvincingly accuses India of fomenting trouble in Pakistan but no one buys it. No other country accuses India of fomenting terror. Pakistan on the other hand has been accused not justby India but China, Afganistan, Iran, UK, US of exporting terror that hurts their citizens.
yeah, india has deep poverty..thats why it survives on alms and aids from the world.....it has religious extremism, that's why suicide bombings, sectarian violence and hate speeches are everyday norm in India...and India has social unrest, that's why there are no investments and business in india....isn't it Ms. Fouzia......you are sooooo intelligent...Pakistan needs more people like you to go down the drain faster than ever......:)
"We have a government that has just completed its five-year term and we are moving towards a smooth transfer of power."
The only reason this government completed its five year term and is moving towards a smooth transfer of power is because of the Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act, which makes support conditional on Pakistan's military being subordinated to its elected government, and taking action against militants sheltering on its soil. If it was not for this bill Pak Army would have staged another coup by now.
"India has deep poverty, religious fundamentalism and extensive social problems. Yet, it is consistently seen in a positive light because Indians consistently promote their national interests over local political affiliations."
She could not resist dragging India into her flawed narrative. Indians are consistently seen in a positive light because their nominal GDP is $1.847 trillion and it is not the epicenter and sponsor of terrorism.