Today, you can send a SMS to ‘8300’ with your CNIC number and get details of whether you are registered to vote and where. Imagine if the entire process of casting a vote could also be completed in a few minutes without leaving one’s home. This technology is available and is as easy as making a phone call or sending a SMS. Recently, a political party held their intra-party elections in Islamabad and voting was done by calling a UAN number, punching in one’s CNIC number and selecting the candidate of choice. It is time we extended this technology to the common voters in the upcoming countrywide elections.
There are approximately 120 million adults in the country — i.e., potential voters. Of these, about 90 million have NADRA CNICs issued, so NADRA has the details of all these people. As per the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), there are nearly 120 million mobile phone SIMs in Pakistan and approximately 75 million mobile phone users with some people carrying multiple SIMs. The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and NADRA should jointly implement a system where people register their CNIC and voting area. NADRA could verify these customers with the data it has. Then, on election day, Pakistanis could vote either by sending a SMS or by dialling a UAN number. When the system receives the CNIC number, it should automatically check if the CNIC is valid, if the voter is registered and then look up the voting area before presenting the individual with a list of candidates/parties to vote for. The individual could choose the candidate/party by selecting the desired options over SMS or on phone call. The entire process would take less than five minutes.
This new system would be made incredibly secure as the CNIC number could be matched with the mobile phone SIM ownership records with the PTA. Multiple entries from different mobile phones using the same CNIC number could be thwarted by allowing only one entry per CNIC number. This would also help out the Interior Ministry with its problem of unregistered SIMs, as people would rationally attempt to ensure SIM ownership on their CNIC.
The SMS and UAN services for election purposes should be absolutely free to minimise all barriers. In rural areas, PCOs should be used by people who do not have mobile phones. The ECP could focus its entire marketing efforts around promoting the new system. Those who do not own a mobile phone, especially rural females, could be allowed to vote using their father/son/husband’s mobile phone and NADRA records could link family members.
The SMS messages could be in English, Urdu or Roman Urdu. For those who cannot read or write, the UAN number could run a multilingual automated voice system, like when you call a bank or a mobile phone company helpline. This system could be accessed by people living in every corner of Pakistan, as well as Pakistanis living abroad who simply place an international call back home with their CNIC in hand and vote.
This system can be set up in less than a month. Providing a convenient, hassle-free voting solution for all Pakistanis is the responsibility of the ECP and other relevant organs of the state. By implementing a cost-effective, transparent and efficient solution, both the ECP and NADRA would stand out in the entire world for their use of technology for Pakistan. With this simple and secure voting system, more people will start exercising their basic right to vote, thereby helping to advance democracy in our country.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 7th, 2012.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
We are usually too quick to dismiss any idea. It may look far fetched but given the mobile penetration rate that Pakistan enjoys, it should not be dismissed as an alternative, or even a parallel method of voting.
The best systems can be hacked. We know that the current manual system is routinely hacked. But adding additional checks and using prevalent technology can make it harder to cheat.
Such a system along with a simple persistence that a CNIC holder's vote counts in the vicinity of the permanent address can simplify matters even further. Citizens may be allowed to protect their votes by dialing in a EC UAN and entering their CNIC and setting a unique PIN code.
I think the author's thoughts need positive feedback. It may very well lead to an agreed upon process that is better than the current open house for the electoral mafia.
PS: I find it very amusing that most people consider it a sane logic that if the US can't do it, so can't we.
Perhaps this would work. A demo. http://vimeo.com/54763286
@gp65: True.
Yes, the article may sound far-fetched at the moment, but bottomline is that most people do not vote due to unnecessary hassles. However, hats off to the author for presenting a solution, which may bear holes, but i'm sure they could be fine-tuned with time in order to tackle this issue adequately.
With all the pointed out weaknesses of the proposed system it still is far better than the present system whose weaknesses far outweigh that of the proposed system. The biggest weakness of the present system is that 70 percent of the people don't vote because of the hassles. So where does democracy stand here?
Is the issue really free and fair elections? becuase if that was the case, then that could've been achieved with the current system intact, when i say current system, i mean the long lines of voters outside of the voting locations and NOT the truck load of hooligans storming the voting booth and filling out fake forms. the method of voting is a means, but if the end is not what is required, then the point of the whole exercise fails. ditto for the failed police system, the failed traffic regulations, the failed country wide safety measures and so on. one word: sincerity.
I respectfully tend to differ from suggestion of writer. He has himself pointed the weakness in the system that..... "Those who do not own a mobile phone, especially rural females, could be allowed to vote using their father/son/husband’s mobile phone and NADRA records could link family members."
This will open pandora box of allegations especially from women whose male members of the family have a history of depriving them from the right of vote. Pakistan's rural areas are already notorious such as Dera Ismail Khan where the women were barred from participation. One of the important legal hurdles would be that misrepresentation would be difficult to prove.
As per your suggestion, then only one person can cast vote for the rest of his family members, because all he needs is the telephone and 5-10 CNIC's of his/her family members.
Moreover, the law of Pakistan prohibits voting in absentia therefore it is important for the voter himself/herself to be present at the polling station.
I think the current model is practiced worldwide and it is the trust on system and enfranchisement that they have large voter turnouts. I think Election Commission of Pakistan under the able and honest leadership of Justice Fakhruddin G. Ibrahim in collaboration with NADRA has rightly introduced the new rule of displaying picture against CNIC in the voter lists, which will discourage duplicious and deceptive voting.
Smarty pants, what if someone steals your CNIC and votes in ur name by SMS , and who is to ensure SIMs are matched to CNIC, and how about rural areas where people still don't have CNIC and cell phones, Even the developed countries don't opt for vote through SMS in elections, remember your country's future depends on it, its not some beauty contest
Voting via mobile phone is a good idea but considering that so many phones get stolen, there is no way to authenticate whether the vote caster is authentic or not. It does offer unparalleled convenience though.
Oversimplification. If it was as easy as the author says, US would have implemented it long ago. The EC would not be recommending that army be used to verify voters in Karachi. Effective use of techonlogy to make life easy for people is wonderful but it cannot be at the expense of free and fair elections.
Also the author has compared the 87% voting record in Bangladesh with 44% in Pakistan but that has nothing to do with electronic voting since voting process was similar in Bangladesh too in 2008. So to imply that the long lines and delays are the reason for low turnout is simply not supported by facts provided by the author.
shouldnt you suggest this to the ECP personally?
All sounds fine and dandy but have the potential problems with hacking been resolved? Rigging is one thing but what about hacked and fake elections as a result of this?
Wishful thinking. Something we're really good at :)