Hakimullah Mehsud, a ruthless commander who has led the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) for the last three years, has lost operational control of the movement and the trust of his fighters, said a senior Pakistan army official based in the South Waziristan tribal region, the group's stronghold.
The organisation's more moderate deputy leader, Waliur Rehman, 40, is poised to succeed Mehsud, whose extreme violence has alienated enough of his fighters to significantly weaken him, the military sources told Reuters.
"Rehman is fast emerging as a consensus candidate to formally replace Hakimullah," said the army official, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. "Now we may see the brutal commander replaced by a more pragmatic one for whom reconciliation with the Pakistani government has become a priority."
The TTP, known as the Pakistan Taliban, was set up as an umbrella group of militants in 2007.
Its main aim is to topple the US-backed government in Pakistan and impose its austere brand of Islam across the country of 185 million people, although it has also carried out attacks in neighbouring Afghanistan.
The militants intensified their battle against the Pakistani state after an army raid on Islamabad's Lal Masjid in 2007, which had been seized by allies of the group.
Mehsud, believed to be in his mid-30s, took over the Pakistan Taliban in August 2009. He rose to prominence in 2010 when US prosecutors charged him with involvement in an attack that killed seven CIA employees at a US base in Afghanistan. His profile was raised further when he appeared in a farewell video with the Jordanian suicide bomber who killed the employees.
Reuters interviewed several senior Pakistan military officials as well as tribal elders and locals during a three-day trip with the army in South Waziristan last week, getting rare access to an area that has been a virtual no-go zone for journalists since an army offensive was launched in October 2009.
Three senior military officials said informers in the Pakistan Taliban told them Mehsud was no longer steering the group.
Pakistan Taliban commanders did not respond to repeated requests for comment on the possible leadership change.
US officials said that while Rehman was Mehsud's natural successor, they cautioned about expecting an imminent transition. Mehsud's standing in the Pakistan Taliban might have weakened, but he still had followers, they said.
Washington has offered a reward of $5 million for information leading to the capture of either Mehsud or Rehman.
One Pakistan military official, who has served in South Waziristan for more than two years, said his Pakistan Taliban contacts first alerted him to Mehsud's waning power six months ago, when constant pressure from the Pakistan military, US drone strikes and poor health had hurt his ability to lead.
"Representing the moderate point of view, there is a probability that under Rehman, TTP will dial down its fight against the Pakistani state, unlike Hakimullah who believes in wanton destruction here," said the military official based in the South Waziristani capital of Wana.
The official said this might lead to more attacks across the border in Afghanistan because Rehman has been pushing for the group's fighters to turn their guns on Western forces.
Other factions within the Pakistan Taliban such as the Nazir group in South Waziristan and the Hekmat Gul Bahadur faction in North Waziristan have struck peace deals with the Pakistani military while focusing attacks on Western and Afghan forces in Afghanistan.
A change in the Pakistan Taliban's focus would complicate Western efforts to stabilise Afghanistan before most Nato troops leave by the end of 2014, said Riaz Mohammad Khan, a Pakistani diplomat who has held several posts dealing with Afghanistan.
The United States is already fighting the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network, which is based along the unruly frontier between Afghanistan and Pakistan and which is perhaps Washington's deadliest foe in Afghanistan.
The last thing US-led Nato troops need is a new, formidable enemy in the approach to 2014.
Such a shift in emphasis, however, could reduce the number of suicide bombings that have plagued Pakistan in recent years, scaring off investment needed to prop up an economy that has barely managed to grow since 2007.
At each other's throats
The Pakistan Taliban, who are close to al Qaeda, remain resilient despite a series of military offensives. They took part in a number of high-profile operations, including an attack on army headquarters in 2009, assaults on military bases, and the attempted assassination of Pakistani schoolgirl Malala Yousufzai in October, who had campaigned for girls' education.
The Pakistan Taliban were also blamed for the 2008 bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad which killed more than 50 people.
Under Mehsud, the organisation formed complex alliances with other militant groups spread across Pakistan.
But it has long been strained by internal rivalries over strategy. Mehsud has pushed the war with the Pakistani state, while others such as Rehman want the battle to be against US and allied forces in Afghanistan.
"Rehman has even held secret negotiations with the Pakistani government in the past but Hakimullah always stood in his way, wanting to carry on fighting the Pakistani military," a second Wana-based military official said.
The two were at each other's throats earlier this year and hostilities were close to open warfare, Taliban sources said.
"Differences within the ranks have only gotten worse, not better, rendering the TTP a much weaker force today than a few years ago," the second military official said.
A source close to the Taliban told Reuters there had been months of internal talks on the Pakistan Taliban's decreasing support among locals and fighters in tribal areas where the group has assassinated many pro-government elders.
"The Taliban know they are fighting a public relations war, and under someone like Hakimullah, they will only lose it," added the source, who declined to be identified because he was not authorised to speak to the media.
It isn't clear whether Mehsud will hand over the leadership to Rehman without a fight.
A power struggle could split the group, making it more difficult to recruit young fighters and also disrupt the safe havens in Pakistan used by Afghan militants.
According to accepted practice, a leadership council, or shura, will ultimately decide whether to formally replace Mehsud with Rehman.
Intelligence officials said Mehsud had not commanded any recent operations, including an August 16 attack on the Minhas Airbase in Pakistan and a suicide attack on a street market in May that killed 24 people.
Military sources said Rehman planned the April 15 jail break in Bannu in Pakistan that freed 384 prisoners, including an estimated 200 Taliban members and an al Qaeda-linked militant who had attempted to assassinate former president Pervez Musharraf.
Fall from grace
Intelligence officials in the area said Mehsud's brutality had turned his own subordinates against him, while the more measured Rehman had emerged as the group's primary military strategist.
"If a leader doesn't behave like a leader, he loses support. For the longest time now, Hakimullah has done the dirty work while Waliur Rehman is the thinker. Taliban fighters recognise this," said the first Pakistani military source.
A local elder described Mehsud as "short-tempered and trigger-happy".
"(Mehsud) used to work 24 hours a day, tirelessly. But he would also put a gun to anyone's head and kill them for his cause," said a local shopkeeper who has family members involved in the Pakistan Taliban.
Mehsud gained his reputation fighting with the Afghan Taliban against US and allied forces in Helmand province in Afghanistan. He was later given command of Taliban factions in the Bajaur, Orakzai, Khyber and Kurram regions.
He took over the Pakistan Taliban after a weeks-long succession battle with Rehman following the death of Baitullah Mehsud in a drone strike. The two Mehsuds were not related.
COMMENTS (56)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Loling @USCENTCOM He has posted the same comment on ET which he posted on PDF.
@US CENTCOM:
Why not speak about the treason against Pakistan which the US is directly responsible for. We Nationalists are neither scared of the gun you have behind our back nor convinced by pathetic promises.
If you cared about the relationship between Pakistan and US there would be no nuclear deal with India at the expense of Pakistan (same deal denied to Pakistan continuously), you wouldn't offer even more advanced F16's to India than us. We are being blamed continuously and it is certain that upon defeat in this war the heap will be tossed on our heads. In other words we will be blamed for your failure and you will abandon us as we are not useful to you anymore (as has happened after the defeat of the Soviets)
We believe the Taliban are a grave threat... but you created these same people in the 1980's and we took the fall for it. Since we do not have a Nationalist media we just parrot what we are told. 4 Billion dollars were pumped into the mouth of the mujahideen by USA who later matured into the Taliban. You supported terror then... very logical when people suggest you do so now as well.
If this is a campaign for public relations, then it is bound to fail. This article looks into the possible reasons for this failing relationship: link text
@Hamid Hassan: If there has to be. What if that violence is being instigated, aided and aetted as part of state policy?
@Ammar You just can't stand the fact that Afghans like the real Indians not the confused former Indians. Lolz,
Whatever, the institutional management style of Taliban is worth noticing. Some one is thinker other is barbarian, etc and they use their people on these basis to achieve their strategic goals. Now a thinker is coming to lead its group.
Why their focus on Afghan war will make reconciliation with Pakistan Army. Extremely poor strategy by Pakistani Military establishment. They are always revising the fail the strategy, the strategy of Good Taliban and Bad Taliban. The establishment is once again playing with the blood of Pashtoons in the region just for the seek Amount in wars...
@ Zalmai
You are not a spokesperson of Afghans but India here. lolz
The Khan
You don't sound like you are from Afghanistan. You speak the language of a Pakistani who is itching to pick fights. Sane Aghans and Indians do not see themselves in Babar Ghauri terms. These were brave rulers of their time. Nothing particularly wrong with them.
Those historical figures don't cause enmity. Enmity and hatreds arise from people today 'celebrating' some rulers even outsiders because they caused destruction to someone else. That is a statement of enmity. It earns enmity in return. There is no enmity for Afghanistan in India.
I belong from Afghanistan and its stupid to see Afghanis thinking they are natural allies to India from 16 century. I was here thinking Babar and Ghauri were from Afghanistan.
The story is product of GHQ imagination and shows how much the Pak Army is close to the Taliban. Pak Army just cannot stop its appetite for forging an alliance with Taliban. The way this report has been leaked to media make it very unreliable and apparently it aim to create an impression of Good Taliban and Bad Taliban from the perspective of Pakistan. Pak Army should stop doing that and go after Taliban without discrimination as Taliban are the biggest threat to stability of Pakistan and to the region.
@Zalmai: Afghanistan is the biggest producers of Poppy and you tell me that Pakistan has destroyed your country. Al Qaeda and Talibans are mostly Afghani nationals which still control half of your country. Pakistan has the largest refugee camp for Afghanistan. Treated these Afghanis as Pakistani Nationals. What have Afghanistan given us in return? AK 47, Poppy and Fanaticism. For God Sakes, You guys dont even have access to the sea and use Karachi.. All you investments cross through Pakistan even the ones from India. India has been making the same mistake that Pakistan made in Zia's Era. But I say, Let them make the same mistake.
I vote for massive infighting amongst all factions, where they kill each other off and we ALL get rid of them and their brand of violence entirely and forever, inshallah! Pakistan zindabad, hamesha!!
It is hard to understand how this can be a warranty that the new Taliban chief will not attack Pakistanis at all? According to my research Wali has been the planner of almost each and every major attack on Pakistan and Pakistanis. Maybe he is more media savvy but this doesn't change the fact that Hakimullah, Qari and Wali are the principal leaders of the TTP which is responsible for 40,000 Pakistani war on terror deaths and over $70 Billion of losses in this war.
These people cannot be absolved of their role. The ISI should not only do everything to dent their influence but finish these top commanders. Instead even in Black Thunderstorm (Swat operation) which is being touted as a great success (proven wrong by the Malala attack) Fazlullah escaped to Afghanistan. Truly pathetic. These people are the greatest killers of Pakistanis.
@Happy Pakistani: Shame on your mindset ! It is attitudes like yours that are responsible for the abyss Pakistan finds itself in.
@Ammar
"My opinion referred to the Indian involvement in unrest in Pakistan which is no secret as well that RAW operates very heavily in Afghanistan. Indian investment there is good but it is due to a greater agenda, i.e. for use against Pakistan."
First of all RAW's involvement in the unrest in Pakistan is grossly exaggerated by certain elements to deflect attention away from their incompetence in handling this unrest and their irresponsible policies causing this unrest.
Secondly, ISI openly aids and abets the Taliban and Afghans now realize that Pakistan is determined to keep Afghanistan destabilized and they are taking precautions to prevent Afghanistan from descending back into the chaos of the 80s, 90s and 2000s.
Finally, how will Indian investment in rebuilding highways, schools and hospitals in Afghanistan be used against Pakistan. Pakistan could have invested in the reconstruction of Afghanistan and endeared themselves to Afghans but it chooses to keep Afghanistan destabilized through its proxies.
Pakistan is the only country in the region that has become a security state that promotes jihadi terrorists to bleed India and burn Afghanistan. Afghans see right through the hypocrisy and duplicity of Pakistan and they want nothing to do with them.
so TTP has changed their spokespersons? (ET. Please tell me, what i have done wrong, as you have not been posting my comments for quite some time)
he will get a drone for christmas...
@US CENTCOM: stop bluffing and double gaming,you don't know what other sections of your intelligence doing with us and who all are on board.We have fair idea how others countries and their soil used to make TTP,almost seventeen years back how Afghan Talibans were made by Pakistan under complete guidance,money,meetings provided by USA/KSA/UAE/UK money.
@ Zalmai @gp65
Sorry, I had wrong stats over number of consulates. If it is Afghanistan's vision for its people to enhance trade and ties with India, good for you and that's your right. My opinion referred to the Indian involvement in unrest in Pakistan which is no secret as well that RAW operates very heavily in Afghanistan. Indian investment there is good but it is due to a greater agenda, i.e. for use against Pakistan.
ohhhhhh noooooooo!!!!!!!!!!! just wish god that this doesn't happen.....this shouldn't happen to the good and the bright side..........
I don't know how to make people and the govt including agencies understood that Talibans are not in their control they have lot of sponsors now,do not live in fools paradise,its now the time for Pakistan seriously sit down with Iran,China,Russia,Tajiks,Uzbiks and Afghans to choke-out plan how to ensure peace on 01 Jan 2015 because before (complete ?) withdrawal of USA/NATO,they will sow lot seeds of divide and in fighting,very serious matter now.
@Happy Pakistani: bring it on!!!!!!!
@US CENTCOM:
how come an army personnel from central command is commenting over a news in such a obscure website? is this a paid news?
Taliban is not a common enemy, as soon as NATO abandons Afghanistan, Pakistan will make a peace deal with Taliban. Understand this general, Taliban is only the enemy of the developed world, it's not Pakistan's enemy. you had more than a decade, yet you never stood united with Pakistan on any of the issues, now, when you are packing your bags, you talk about unity? ...is this an epiphany or just another way to run away hiding the shame?
for the sake of the innocent people?..... wow!!! this is a refreshingly new concept to the world,. did you ask your higher ups before making this comment?
you are fighting a war that was never to be won, for Pakistani generals, they never considered Taliban to be an enemy, they have been using them for decades as assets to further their ulterior motives, and you except them to change their stance overnight?
I doubt this news. TTP has always been focused on grabbing land, money and power in Pakistan. Occasionally they do launch an attack in Afghanistan so they can continue their "Jihad" propaganda.
Anyone showing sympathy to TTP (people like Munawar Hasan) should be prosecuted. Malala had the courage to stand up to these beasts, but there are thousands of girls in Afghanistan who are brutalized by Taliban minded Afghans. Pakistani state should not tolerate these animals. Yes, I know I'm not being a realist, but there is nothing wrong in wishing.
@Zeux: "phainty inspite of drone strikes & help from your khudhawan "Amreeka" 3000 of yours are already dead by the hands of their own people...... America kay tattu
It is delusional thinking that the change in TTP leadership will change any ground realities. Taliban has its own agenda of rule by violence and deprive people of their basic rights. From day one they have been the enemy of peace. They have been tried and tested as recently as a few years ago in the Swat valley, and that area is still recovering from the Taliban menace. This common enemy has to be dealt with an iron fist- new leadership or not. Those who think that violence against Pakistanis will cease may be totally wrong. The group that is responsible for the death of over 40,000 innocent Pakistanis along with over 5,000 military personnel will change its stance overnight? Where does the argument stand that the TTP was created by the USA, when they say they will now attack NATO troops across the border from Pakistan? Rest assured, Taliban are our common enemy and they have been cornered. This new leadership drama is just a strategy to buy time and regroup. This is the time we all need to stand united and hit them from all sides for the sake of the innocent people of the region, who have been suffering at the hands of these ruthless killers for a very long time.
LTC T.G. Taylor DET-United States Central Command www.centcom.mil/ur
I say this is the best news for Pakistan! I hope it is true. Afghans were getting too big for their boots. Our ISI need to get these people to focus on Afghanistan and India.
@Ammar: improve yourself. check what i mean by that
@Ammar: "@ Yoghurt lover Though you are so concerned about Indian embassies, please tell us What 14 Indian consulates are doing in a far away, war-struck Afghanistan, than few in all other neighboring countries???"
I am not Yoghurt Lover but can reply. This is a lie that has been told to you by your agencies proxies like any other lies. India has 5 embassy consulates in the exact same cities that Pakistan has http://embassy.goabroad.com/embassies-in/afghanistan . If you think there is a 6th consulate , please provide the address. After consulates cannot be hidden can they?
@Mulla Kuta
Do you have any problem with that?
@Ammar who writes "Though you are so concerned about Indian embassies, please tell us What 14 Indian consulates are doing in a far away, war-struck Afghanistan, than few in all other neighboring countries???"
Well actually it's not 14 embassies. It's 87+7 embassies. You are looking at the wrong sources.
If you look at the right sources, then you will learn that India has 87 embassies and 7 upcoming.
Waliur Rehman is the chief architect of suicide bombers. They all are serpents of devil.
@Ammar
There are four Indian consulates in Afghanistan because Afghans have a long history of trade and commerce with India dating back more than a hundred years. Afghans have been sending their kids to Indian educational institutions for generations and this tradition continues in present times.
Afghan kings employed Indian teachers, professors, pilots and other professionals long before the creation of Pakistan and this relationship will only get stronger despite the objections of Pakistan.
Afghanistan will do what is in its best interest and right now India is the only Asian country that has invested more than $ 2 billion in rebuilding Afghanistan. Pakistan on the other hand destroyed Afghanistan and keeps on pursuing a destabilizing policy. Afghans will always choose India as a natural ally and nothing can change this reality.
It is not the job of the Military in any country to prioritize and prefer one set of killers over another. The people must call for the elimination of all groups connected to the Taliban and Al Qaeda, with a firm time deadline. If they cannot do the job the senior officers must be cashiered and junior officers without ideological baggage be promoted and given responsibilities. No officer has been dismissed from service for dereliction of duty when 40,000 citizens have been murdered by terrorists in cold blood. In the English language a word called ACCOUNTABILITY exists. When we keep a high maintenance and costly watch Dog at home, it must do its job -- if it cannot get another animal.
@Sidrah
Afghans abhor the Taliban and everything they stand for because they are stooges of Pakistan propagating an alien ideology. Hamid Gul went on record and called both Haqqani and Mullah Omar patriotic Pakistanis and Afghans will never forgive them for selling out.
the REAL question is will he get a Villa in Abbotabad?
So now that the TTP is going to focus on attacks across the border we are suppose to blieve that they are all of a sudden holy warriors like they were in the Afghan war! This is bogus news and only out to fool people.
@ Yoghurt lover
Though you are so concerned about Indian embassies, please tell us What 14 Indian consulates are doing in a far away, war-struck Afghanistan, than few in all other neighboring countries???
Do Afghans actually like taliban? Really want to know.
We are supposed to believe this report because the most reliable and trustworthy institution in Pakistan is the source. There is no corroboration of this development from independent sources, which means this is fabricated by Pak Army to change public discourse about the TTP. The deep state up to its old tricks but nobody is buying it anymore. When will the Pashtuns wake up and realize they are being toyed with.
Cool Dudes.....
If I openly say that ISI is behind the raise of this group, will comment be removed?
Indian embassies can expect new attacks, sponsored by you know who.
The army and government are deluded to think that anything is going to change with new Taliban leadership. Peace has been arranged with them in the past, and each time they have gone back to all out violence. Their only goal is to kill, murder and destroy.
Even if the taliban do change their 'strategy' and focus on Afghanistan, does that make them any better? If anything the situation is worse because then the army is supporting terrorism against a neighbouring country!
The army refers to Rehman as a 'thinker'. There is nothing thoughtful about planning the death and destruction of innocent people.
The army knows the locations of all key members of the Taliban. It should round up these criminals, and put them on trial.
It seems plans are afoot to rebuild TTP's reputation after Malala attack. Now brutal savages will be presented as holy warriors even after cold-blooded murder of thousands of innocent Pakistanis.
Can Reuters tell us about the credibility of any news whose source is different and talk about a different thing? And also is this journalism to report while confirming or taking opinion of the other side? Reuters had been once considered the most credible among the three major wire services but i think they are loosing its credibility now because of a new trend in journalism and that is to work as a mouth piece for others. very sad
so Waliur Rehman will be next drone target.
Well if there has to be violence, I ll prefer it is on that side of the border rather than this side
After the phainty they got from Pak forces, That's what is left for these monsters to do
Ah yes, new chief will focus on Afghanistan, thats makes everything okay.
Barbarians.