During a recently-held workshop on political finance, some participants analysed asset declarations of political parties and MPs. Should the ECP audit them, the accounts of most parties and their MPs’ asset declarations would not stand the scrutiny. This is a shameful and multidimensional scandal that has engulfed the whole spectrum of our political leadership. It’s extremely sad that our lawmakers appear to be lawbreakers and could be disqualified in bulk under corrupt practices. The ECP then would have to hold by-elections prior to general elections in at least 90 per cent of constituencies. Has our political leadership learnt any lesson from these scandals? Is it going to scrutinise applications of the by-election candidates thoroughly and diligently? Will the ECP evolve any system to probe validity of claims made in nomination papers? I have little hope from the political leadership as it has continued playing games that alienate the electorates from the electoral processes. But that hope is diminishing due to the ECP’s failure to catch candidates who blatantly violated its newly-introduced code of conduct, such as Abdul Qadir Gilani and Shaukat Bosan, who provided transport to voters while displaying party stickers and flags on vans. They also distributed lunch boxes to ECP staff. We have proof of these violations; some of it has already been emailed to the ECP. Moreover, the statements of election expenses and receipts submitted by the candidates to the ECP show serious discrepancies. I appeal to the ECP to initiate a thorough probe into the NA-151 by-election, in order to enhance its credibility.
Had the ECP thoroughly scrutinised the nomination papers of the candidates in 2008, the country would have been saved from humiliation and millions of rupees from the holding of so many by-elections. Now, the holding of by-elections in 10 constituencies is so close to the end of current assemblies’ tenure that it has attracted a little media attention. I hope the ECP officials do not take this lightly. Another replay of NA-151 will undermine the commission’s credibility. In order to deter potential candidates from committing corrupt practices, the ECP should set up a mechanism to scrutinise the nomination papers and applicants’ asset statements.
We have fascinating examples from other countries where citizens forced corrupt politicians out of the electoral field. In South Korea in the 1990s, civil society organisations launched a ‘blacklisting campaign’ called Nakchon-Nakson. The campaign successfully kicked out corrupt politicians and forced the state to introduce political and election reforms. As many as 85 per cent of the blacklisted candidates lost elections and the campaign deeply influenced civil society organisations in Japan and many other countries. Coming back to Pakistan, we have alarming similarities with the Korean political situation of the 80s and 90s. There appears to be a huge gap between political elite and civil society and peoples’ aspirations. Political institutions are hugely underdeveloped in comparison to civil society and the state. The political elite has encouraged parochialism based on patronage instead of political programme. If political leaders remain insulated from the heat of the peoples’ rage, then someone will fill this vacuum. The leaders must clean their parties of the corrupt elements. Civil society organisations can’t continue to merely observing the elections; they must challenge the corrupt practices of the corrupt politicians.
There is enough data to prepare a list of corrupt MPs and make it public, as the civil society did in Korea. But first, there is a need to strategise the blacklisting campaign. If party leaders continue to field corrupt candidates, then we may witness a blacklisting campaign in Pakistan, too because only clean, incorrupt and law-abiding MPs can give us good governance and confidence to the electorates in democratic development.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 6th, 2012.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Do these elections deliver to the people, what these are meant to deliver i.e. true and effective representation of the masses? If so, why then the people of the USA have to endure slavery of the Mafiosis and world's biggest terrorist? The Mafiosis that would not allow the people of the USA to have a State sponsored Health Service that is to be found in most of the materially developed countries? We the people are our own worst enemies. So many thinkers, philosophers have come and gone wringing their hands in utter despair and disgust in seeing us, the people not doing what we need to be doing and doing what we need not to be doing. What the people need to do, is to come together joining hands with each other to organise themselves into a party of the people in control of the people. People want to be led by a leader. Have they not been misled by those leaders all the time? Are the people of the USA not misled all the time? So what is the need of having a leader? Are there not enough intellectuals amongst us the people? When we organise ourselves, we can then open the way for the best brains and ideas lying hidden among us to emerge. We should never forget that whatever need to be done for our betterment it is us who has to do it. Do it collectively. Have those leaders and political parties done much for us? So why do the people of the USA not have a State sponsored Health Service?
@Mardana Bari: Umm, actually Falcon wasn't criticising the writer, and just because he manages an NGO does not make him lose his credibility, and I'm sure most Pakistanis completely agree that the first step to better governance is fielding honest and credible candidates, otherwise people might just decide to take matters into their own hands.
Agree with Falcon. It appears that NGO wala in Pakistan try to look smarter and criticize politicians. The author and his friends such as Omar Asghar Khan even worked in the cabinet of dictators who violate the constitutions. If accounts must be scrutinized, I never saw any NGO specially like the one of Bari be really and thoroughly investigated by any federal agency. I am sure they will not pass the test of honesty. The merge personal and professional expenditure and lower their cost of living which is a dream of an average Pakistani. They really make fun of the accounting system and many other things. Such articles are written only to look smart for donors otherwise these people are not clean to ensure accountability as mentioned in the article such as South Korea.
I for one will not hold any hope that the ECP will introduce any of the suggestions made by the learned author,I have yet to see a single report/investigation on any issue in Pakistan let alone see the implementation of any recommendations. As always has been the case "Mukh Mukha" and "Mitti Pawo"
@author- It has been a while since NA-151 elections. As far as I remember, you also published an article then with similar content. What is different now, since I was expecting some data on the recent by-elections rather than repeat of the whole NA-151 episode?