Millions of dollars have been spent by the Pakistani government to influence our answer to this question. Over the past 10 years, the Pakistani government and civil society waged an expensive public relations (PR) battle to convince the world that Pakistan shouldn’t be narrowly defined by the word ‘terrorism’.
Ten years later, the word terrorism continues to shadow Pakistan like a mistress who can’t live with or without her lover. You can barely find a single article on Pakistan in the international media today that doesn’t make a reference to terrorism. The PR campaign to disassociate the words ‘Pakistan’ and ‘terrorism’ appears to have been an unmitigated failure because unfortunately, this central campaign broke several cardinal rules of smart PR.
For example, if I tell you not to think of an elephant, the first image that pops in your mind is that of an elephant. Similarly, if I tell you that my country has a lot more to offer to the world than terrorism, the word terrorism is probably the only association that sticks in your mind and that, too, with negative connotations only.
One way to break this cycle is for Pakistan to make news for reasons other than terrorism. Pakistan’s civil society, as well as the government, has attempted to do this by promoting a ‘softer image’ of the country abroad (for example, by staging high profile fashion shows at Pakistani embassies around the world). However, these efforts have barely created a ripple, let alone a splash, in international media.
The news media follows a simple editorial rule: when dog bites man, it’s not news. When man bites dog, its news. Any country can host a fashion show. But there’s only one country in the world where religious extremists can hold the policy apparatus of a nuclear-armed Muslim state hostage to their street power.
This editorial insight reveals a key ingredient of our newsworthiness: Pakistan’s dirty laundry is what makes us interesting as a nation, i.e., an unholy mix of religious extremism, nuclear arms and a state of denial about the gravity of our problems.
How should Pakistan react to international media wanting to air our dirty laundry in public?
I suggest a paradigm shift in our PR strategy. Instead of dismissing international concerns as overblown and a sign of biased media coverage, we can turn the tables by flipping our greatest weakness into our most potent PR strength.
The world will continue to talk about Pakistan and terrorism. Instead of running around in circles trying to stop this, let’s influence the type of stories the world gets to hear about Pakistan and terrorism. For example, a powerful counter-narrative on terrorism can emerge from Pakistan by leveraging a simple tool: a public opinion survey that shows the majority of Pakistanis wanting their children to grow up in a country free from the threat of terrorism. This survey is also likely to reveal embarrassing fissures within Pakistani society; i.e., not every Pakistani rejects the use of violence to impose their religious world view on the rest of the world. But instead of brushing these stories under the carpet, it’s time to have an open conversation about these stories.
Pakistan’s fundamental PR problem isn’t that we have religious extremists in our midst; it’s that we don’t seriously view religious extremism as an existential threat to our state. We can change this narrative very quickly by owning the stories of real Pakistani men and women fighting against extremism in the country.
For example, we’re quick to claim that over 30,000 Pakistanis have lost their lives in the War on Terror but we haven’t communicated or owned a single human story, except Malala Yousufzai, that demonstrates our commitment to fighting extremism.
Fortunately, every PR crisis represents an opportunity to reshape one’s public image already in flux. In this case, the moment we stop trying to change the subject, we can finally show the world the light at the end of Pakistan’s terrorism tunnel.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 4th, 2012.
COMMENTS (42)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Kaalchakra: "That is my first message to my liberal friends. Screw up some courage. In the land of liberalism, that is not a commonly-found commodity"
Sir, I do appreciate your directness and straightforwardness and said so. However, I do not believe that being straightforward is a monopoly of any one group of people. I am a liberal and a Hindu and also very straightforward. Also even though you showed outright disrespect for my beliefs, I will not return the compliment by showing disrespect for your beliefs. This is not because I have any less faith than you but as a liberal, I respect your right to your beliefs. I give myself as an example but there are many liberals (Indians and Pakistanis; Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, agnostics, atheists) who post on E tribune who share my philosophy.
gp85
On the path of truth, there is never any need to substitute emotion, abuse, or tangential rants for reason. When one presents Allah's clear instructions to mankind, truthfully and purely objectively, there is no need for being apologetic. True believers will not stop acting on what Allah asks of them in clearest terms merely because unbelievers are ashamed of it, distort it, hide it, or delete it. That is my first message to my liberal friends. Screw up some courage. In the land of liberalism, that is not a commonly-found commodity.
TAQIYA is another name for PR strategy that you are suggesting....but then again Pakistan has long practiced and perfected it...its just that the deception is not working anymore.
@Hello: Your rebuttal on each point matches my own viewpoint a 100%. Thank you for articulating it so well. The one thing I do appreciate about @kaalchakra is that he is unfailingly polite, sticks to the subject on hand instead of going to unrelated rants and is unapologetic about his viewpoint. This is helpful to me in at least understanding the other viewpoint. When people couch what they are thinking in politically correct terms, one cannot figure out why some people think and act as they do. You ask him "You are supporting violence at every instance then talking about not supporting unneccesary violence". Here the operative word is 'unnecessary'. Kaalchakra thinks that in all these situations, violence is necessary. You and I can disagree but that is what he thinks.
@BlackJack: Perils of speed reading. You did not say what I thought you did. My bad.
Good to see the Pakistan Bashing continues! Someone called us an "exporter of terror! " another said we are a "state sponsor of militant outfits" not really surprising all the bashing came from Indian origin writer's. However what you all fail to realize is that the 100% population are constantly blamed for the mindless acts of a less than 1% of the nation. Further to this is the fact that Pakistan has from its very tragic birth been cursed with Mindless/spineless self centered leaders who have over the years done nothing but propagate hate for the sole intention of misguiding the population for there own personal popularity.On another note all nations have secret service's who are involved in all sorts of nasty enterprises Regime change is a commonly used term that they have been involved in however those agencies get glorification by having good PR while the poor old ISI ( INCOMPETENT STUPID INDIVIDUALS) are often credited/blamed for more than they are capable of.I have no doubt we need to exterminate the terrorists within our midst and we need to start by accepting the problem. BUT WE AS a nation are NOT EXPORTERS OF TERROR although its the common perception that the media both internal and external likes to trumpet.
@gp65: SO my statement was off the mark as is yours that India is the only country to commit to No first use policy. Pls highlight the line in my comment where I said that India is the only country committed to no-first use policy, or withdraw this line from your comment.
We need to highlight our positivity including the recent snooker victory etc. We have become a trouble loved nation. The only news we "love" to read is the news highlighted in red on our local TV channels.
While we all say we love our nation, we (including myself) do nothing but just ponder/comment rather than becoming agents of a change where international media can highlight things other than the word “terrorism” associated with Pakistan.
@Kaalchakra: (1) I can give multiple instances of mosques built on encroached land. Lets take them down aswell. These buildings need to be relocated cause of public sentiment. Its a place of worship for one religion irrespective of what warped logic you give of who made it. Im going to ignore your superiority complex you have vis a vis Hindus worshipping idols (stones as you called it) cause thats their right. I could very easily ridicule many aspects of islam or any other religion but that serves no purpose. Im an atheist by the way.
(2) The graves might not be sacred to you but they are sacred to the families of the people they buried there. Whether you agree Ahmadis are muslim or not, you have no right to go and desecrate the memory of their loved ones. You are following a senseless law that terms Ahmadis as non-muslims like a parrot and then justifying violence on that basis. If you think Ahmadis are non-muslims its your problem. You need to deal with it. As long as they dont harm you in any way you have no right to complain.
(3) Has Pakistan ever been able to find out who carried out any attack ? We know of only one party that openly accepts attacks in Pakistan and that is the TTP. The govt. was requesting them to not attack during Id and Muharram. RAW and CIA are supposedly involved according some parties. Where is the proof ? Why hasnt the Pakistani govt. raised this on any global forum ? Cause its easy to fool your own people with propaganda then the rest of the world
(4) The TTP claimed the attack on Malala so its just normal to assume that they indeed undertook the attack. Now if you want to say they lied thats another issue.
(5) Even if the teacher made an error involving a holy book, the school doesnt need to be burnt down. If you think thats the case then no one can help you. There are rules and laws its not the laws of the jungle which you seem to support.
You are supporting violence at every instance then talking about not supporting unneccesary violence. What mutual respect are you talking about when you dont respect the beliefs of anybody else who thinks differently. If you are shown the truth you choose to stick your head in the sand, if you disagree or feel your beliefs are hurt you think you should burn the other persons house down or punish them in some other way. Bravo Indeed !!!
@BlackJack: "Can you provide references?"
Israel is not a declared nuclear power and hence understandably cannot declare its intent with respect to use of nuclear weapons. I admit I used the term 'No first use' losely and meant who are committed to using it defensively. Here is what Wiki says: China, India and North Korea have pledged No first use' UK has said they will only use it defensively and only if weapons of mass destruction are used against them It is true however that stance of France and Russia is no different from Pakistan and US is somewhere in between. SO my statement was off the mark as is yours that India is the only country to commit to No first use policy. Thanks for the question which certainly helped to correct my own knowledge. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofirstuse @kaalchakra I really appreciate having you on the board, so I am glad you are back after a brief absence. Even though I am unable to agree with your thought process, it is certainly helpful to understand a different way of thinking.@Sabi : Yes I had read that news item and was saddened.
Mr.Bilal
what kind of PR will you have?
Come watch our tolerant hotties demolish temples brick by brick? See some bomb blasts while you have traditional Punjabi break fast? Participate in our lynch a christian campain. oooh so much fun.
@Manishj:
" I fail to understand why there are so many Indians on this page? "
If I may answer this part Sir.
It is so because most Indians, particularly the unarmed innocent ones and Kashmiri Hindus, have become habituated to keeping one eye towards Pakistan. They fear nothing else.
I fail to understand why there are so many Indians on this page? or to ask it differently why ppl from pakistani civil society not visible here? Dont they think it is THE time for Pakistan to act?
Correction: From Wikipedia
China,[7] India, and North Korea,[3] have pledged not to be the first to use nuclear weapons in a conflict. India adopted a "no first use policy" after its nuclear tests in 1998. India's nuclear policy currently states that even though there will be no first-use of nuclear weapons by India, "nuclear retaliation to a first strike will be massive and designed to inflict unacceptable damage".
@BlackJack: You are right. Caught this last night but didn't comment.
India is the only country with a stated "No First Use" policy. The No First Use policy as it originally stood was no first use unless a nuclear bomb is detonated against India in which case India has a stated policy that it will cause punitive and massive (manifold) retaliation against the aggressor. . This may be nuanced right now to add dirty bombs (artillery and other projectiles with a small nuclear payload) that Pakistan has graduated to. A reference was made by a former Defence Secretary about this though I don't remember his name right now.
@gp65: Unlike all other nuclear powers who have a doctrine of no first use, Pakistan does not have that.
Can you provide references? As far as I know neither NATO nuclear powers nor Russia (nor Israel) have a no-first-use policy in place. Each of them have caveats which allow first-use of nuclear weapons against other nuclear weapon states if the perceived threat from a conventional attack justifies such use - this is not very different from what Pakistan is saying.
@gp65: Have you heard Malal's friend who was injured,today norrowly esaped bomb attack which killed her neighbours.So talibans are more credible than our govt at least in this connection,as the promised more attack on malala.
@Kaalchakra: "I don’t know who ‘your’ extremists are, Sir? Unsympathetic unbelievers already accuse Pakistan of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds. Are you now going to hurt yourselves by hunting the hounds, with the goodly hare in toe?"
Forget the author. What about you? - DO you not consider the razing a temple down despite a court stay order as an act of extremism? - Do you not consider the descration of 100 Ahmadi graves an act of extremsm? - Do you not consider the attacks on Moharram procession as an act of extremism? - Do you not consider the attack on Malala - simply because she spoke up for secular education for women - an act of extremism? - Do you not consider the burning down of a Lahore school due to an error by a teacher - an act of extremism?
I look forward to your answer. I understand you are a devout Muslim but I am keen to understand whether a devout Muslim like yourself considers such acts as extremism or not.
As much as I appreciate the optimism, don't you think its a little soon to say "light at the end of Pakistan's terrorism tunnel"? Because from where I am standing I don't see an end to this tunnel. Maybe instead of arranging for a PR campaign for the world, we should have one for the Pakistanis themselves. How can I positively show something to the world when I myself fail to see it?
Plus whats the point of having a pretty exterior when the core is rotting? A PR can make us 'look' beautiful but does that really make us beautiful?
Just a thought. :)
Oh and also, this line: "Similarly, if I tell you that my country has a lot more to offer to the world than terrorism, the word terrorism is probably the only association that sticks in your mind and that, too, with negative connotations only." - i don't see how anyone can view terrorism with any positive connotations.
As much as I appreciate the optimism, don't you think its a little soon to say "light at the end of Pakistan's terrorism tunnel"? Because from where I am standing I don't see an end to this tunnel. Maybe instead of arranging for a PR campaign for the world, we should have one for the Pakistanis themselves. How can I positively show something to the world when I myself fail to see it? - Just a thought. :)
Oh and also, this line: "Similarly, if I tell you that my country has a lot more to offer to the world than terrorism, the word terrorism is probably the only association that sticks in your mind and that, too, with negative connotations only." - i don't see how anyone can view terrorism with any positive connotations.
Your well meaning article and the spirit behind it should be commended. For any Public Relations campaign to be a resounding success the narrative should be grounded in solid facts. Pakistan has been very economical with the Truth, both with its own citizens and with the International community. Once credibility and Trust is eroded rebuilding it is a gargantuan task. In a country where Law makers who dispense Justice have to run for their lives and where citizens challenging the prevailing official discourse can disappear or be silenced by orchestrating the blasphemy law, the challenges for the best PR expert can be daunting. While illusions and stories may sell nationally by creating some USP, those tactics do not work outside. Facts and actions based on reality are watched closely and always likely to triumph the best of PR campaigns.
I don't know who 'your' extremists are, Sir? Unsympathetic unbelievers already accuse Pakistan of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds. Are you now going to hurt yourselves by hunting the hounds, with the goodly hare in toe?
This obsession with pleasing unbelievers at this time is so out of line with people's needs.
What a roundabout way of doing something that most countries take for granted. It is very simple in fact. Why not just stop all activity connected with terrorism? "All activity" is the important term.
If Pakistan wishes to continue as always, the suggested methods may work in the long term. But it will pay to remember that it is not possible to fool all the people all the time.
@Riaz Haq: "n Pakistan’s case, the good news continues to be the emergence of a large and growing middle class population and a vibrant mass media and civil society which underpin the country’s extraordinary resilience."
Rising middle class - I buy. Vibran media - partially (it is very vocal when it comes to attacking politicians but for the most part the mass media observes silence or even encourages some highly blatant acts of intolerance) but vibrant civil society? - Where are they? - Where are they when a school is burn down in Lahore? - Where are they when a temple is razed to the ground despite a court stay order in Karachi? - Where are they when Ahmadi graves are defiled in Lahore? Where are they when despite the tightest security 38 people are killed during moharram processions? - Where are they when a malang is burnt to death as also a businessman killed because he chose not to be part of the Ishq-e-rasool protest? - Where are they when a Hindu girl is raped, forcibly converted and despite her pleas to go to her parents is handed over to her tormentors by the judiciary no less?
We know they do come out on in full force to protest a 3rd rate video made and uploaded in a different country alltogether. Why do they not come out to protest these actions?
Yes, in India to we have had acts of bigotry but our judiciary, media , civil society was not silent and did not let the stories die down after the 24 hour newscycle. This is why the space for people to act on their bigotries has drastically reduced and continues to reduce.
PR? Lets get to business and bring some change. I thought PR stood for Pakistan Railways when I read the title. I tell you if we can clean the mess that the railways is in, it will have no PR problem. The same applies to all other things in Pakistan. Fix the problems with sincerity and I assure you there will be no PR problems.
Fashions shows are not permissible anyways...lets not forget our Islamic roots...
Satyamey Jayate.
No one sympathises with Pakistan because it is a victim of terrorism. It is because of its habit of exporting terror, that the world despises Pakistan. Stop doing it, that will be the biggest PR.
Actions speak louder than world.There was time when America was giving red carpet reception to Ayub Khan with president Kennedy with first lady went to the stairs of President Ayub Khan's aeroplane.This was time when Pakistan had not embrassed mullah.The world had seen how the state of Pakistan had successfuly crushed a movement of mullahs in the name of religion a few years ago in 1953.The world had duly acknowldged Pakistan as a serious new born state trying to stay on its feet with dignity and passion.Pakistan then had not do any PR efforts as world was not blind it could see very well on its own.Arab cointries had genuine respect for Pakistan as it had helped many Arab countries get independance fron colonial powers,in UNO.As Pakistan changed its path from a seroius noble state world had also changed its course of engagements.Now our head of states visit Americal and nobody cares who is there American presidents refuses to meet with pakistani head of states.What a pity.Every houshold has a television and there are thousands of news reporters roaming in Pakistan to keep world abreast of what is going in this world of pures.Actions speak louder than words.No body visits embassies to hear what is going on in Pakistan,tv is in every house where one can listen and one can see with own eyes Seeing is believing We can not fool the world.
Ok, Sir, the point taken. But, I have a problem here with your perceived definition of Public Relations(PR). In my view, a country's PR is nothing but a makeup team of a movie whose job is to make the caste, with natural if not beautiful features for the scene about to be enacted, look more presentable and attractive. But, the trouble with Pakistan is that if you give me a gorilla and ask me use all of my makeup skills to present him as a Shahrukh Khan, then you and I, should be ready to face the incoming eggs and tomatoes!! Therefore, dear sir, change the reality first and then go for a PR campaign.
Pakistan is blessed with tremendous personalities like Zaid Hamid, Orya Maqbool Jaan, etc. Why not make them part of the PR campaign. It will be an epic success in the history of epic successes
So all of Pakistan's problems - religious bigotry, soft corner for terrorists, squabbling institutions, army domination, conspiracy theorists, hate-India/US/Israel/West propaganda, etc etc - ALL can be SOLVED by PR???
Best of Luck to you, Sir! Brilliant!
Bilal, this is simply brilliant. Spot on. Kudos!
Well, a car that can run on water story gave a clear message to the world that Pakistan is nation of people who are living in the 18th century with its educated illiterates. The Friday that was declared for prayer gave another message confirming the first impression. The daily stories of confrontation between the executive and judiciary also provide the proof that the more Pakistan moves forward more it goes backward. Finally constant denials of all that Pak's nationals do in the rest of the world do not help. Take affirmative action in all fields. The world will automatically begin to like Pakistan. It will not be love at first sight but will happen. No need to hire PR firms. Just encourage your countrymen to behave rationally.
First you need minimize the dichotomy that exists in your social sphere not just with respect to religion but also issues with women, as well as how you treat Ahmadiyas and Shias. I know that across the Islamic world there is sense of distrust between the Shias and Sunnis, but what happens in Pakistan on the same matter is way beyond anything comparable
Ya Khuda! Another guy who thinks we would be the land of milk and honey, only if, the media could be managed!
Author perhaps misses the point of difference between Positive PR and Spin (or propaganda). What he is talking about is to spin the news, instead of true PR - which is to engage with various stake holders.
PR in reality is a two way process. It is getting the message out, as much as understanding the market realities. Spin is about a short term propaganda aimed at deceiving the stakeholders.
SPIN works for a while, but stakeholders wise up to such tactics and resist. Best thing to do is to understand the environment and stakeholder needs. That's what true PR should be about. But, then Pakistan will need to listen to the world, instead of just lecturing the world about its deaths.
Is it ready to listen?
"For example, we’re quick to claim that over 30,000 Pakistanis have lost their lives in the War on Terror but we haven’t communicated or owned a single human story, except Malala Yousufzai, that demonstrates our commitment to fighting extremism."
There are insurgency movements throughout the world - the world does not care about them as long as they are not killing people throughout the world. SWAT and SWA operation were an attempt to bring domestic insurgents under control. However, when it comes to addressing the terror emanating from Pakistan that affects other countries. whether it is providing a safe haven to Quetta Shura and Haqqanis or lack of sincere effort to bring 26/11 culprits to justice or lack of control over the many Wahabi madrassas that spew vitriol on kafirs and encourage jihad against them or the fact that the only person ever convicted for terrorism in Pakistan is Shakil Afridi who helped US to get OBL - the stories are there but not the ones you want.
What you dismissed as PR problems are not PR problems. They reflect an ufortunate relaity. By the way ,it is not just terrorism that the world might say - they may also say unsafe nukes. Why is that? BEcause being the only Islamic nuclear weapon country is something a lot of high visibility leaders brag about at every opportunity. Unlike all other nuclear powers who have a doctrine of no first use, Pakistan does not have that. When coupled with the fact that terrorists are gaining ground the concerns are obvious.
Once you change the reality, the PR will automatically change. But it will need some hard decisions to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure in the country - and not just terrorists that attack Pakistanis but terror emanating from Pakistan that affects al its neighbours (China, India, Iran, Afghanistan) and more.
This is a really interesting op-ed, and a unique point of view that could actually change public opinion in the long-term. In the short-term, I don't see it amounting to much, because Pakistan cannot afford to have a free and frank dialogue on terrorism as long as it remains a state sponsor of militant outfits that continue terrorist activities in neighboring countries; this is the key reason that Pakistan is viewed negatively (instead of with sympathy) in the international press - you are not seen as the victim but the aggressor.