Pakistan, United States pledge to focus on trade, not aid

Working Group committed to broadening private sector ties between both countries.

Our Correspondent December 02, 2012


A symbolic move that suggested that US-Pakistan relationship are heading towards stability, the US-Pakistan Economic and Finance Working Group met in Washington, DC, promising to focus on trade and not just aid.

According to a statement issued by the State Department, the group focused on “expanding bilateral economic engagement, particularly in the areas of trade and investment”.

At the talks, the Pakistani delegation was led by Finance Minister Hafeez Sheikh, while Deputy Secretary of State Tom Nides represented the American side. The statement said that the US and Pakistan are committed to broadening private sector ties between both countries.

Speaking to reporters before the meeting, Nides said the group was to discuss economic growth and what both countries can do together. The aim, he said, was “not just to uphold national securities, but to foster economic growth”.

Sheikh said the US-Pakistan economic relationship is very important. “The US is Pakistan’s most important trading partner. Historically, they have invested the most in our country,” he said, adding that Nides has played an important part in reenergising the partnership.

“The areas we would like to focus on are trade, investment, better utilisation of assistance and trying to bring our businesses together to put this relationship on a strong foundation,” said Sheikh.

Hafeez Sheikh

In a press release, Nides highlighted the US government’s initiatives in broadening private sector ties, which included the Pakistan investment conference held in London in October, the launch of the Pakistan Private Investment Initiative, as well as conferences which focused on training and mentoring entrepreneurs from Pakistan.

Meeting with USAID

Sheikh also met with USAID Administrator Dr Rajiv Shah on Friday.

The State Department statement said that in meetings with USAID and other State Department officials, they “highlighted the positive results of ongoing civilian assistance programmes in Pakistan, including significant contributions in sectors critical to economic growth”.

The two sides agreed that Pakistan’s prosperity is “predicated on energy sector reform and the United States welcomed Pakistan’s commitment to undertake the reforms needed to attract greater investment”.

MFN status

The US also commended Pakistan’s efforts in expanding economic cooperation with its neighbours, including Pakistan’s plans to extend most-favoured-nation (MFN) status to India by the end of the year.

“Both sides discussed ways to improve trade and transit with Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics, citing the importance of enhanced trade for the region’s stability and prosperity”.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 2nd, 2012.


Sadia Mukhti | 9 years ago | Reply

The Pakistani Embassy in Washington has done NO promotion of Pakistan to the American public. The Embassy & it's consulates in Chicago, LA & Houston is manned by rude, incompetent staff. In the LA consulate it is impossible to get through no one answers the main line, & if they do they are not qualified to answer any questions. If you read the reviews on google about the harsh, degrading treatment to US Pakistanis is any reflection of how US investors would be treated if they decide to do trade? if these Consulates are asked about their lack of professional behavior their shocking answer..."this is how things are done in Pakistan you pay for what you get" with that kind of attitude no matter what the US - Pakistan agreement for ..."more trade...less AID" is if the lower layers are not improved Pakistan will always be at the losing end.

A.Bajwa | 9 years ago | Reply

Pakistan should shift its relations with US from military to economic.US is a big economy and can boost Pakistan's economy in many ways particularly in the food and service sectors.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read