General David H Petraeus has served in both wars: as Commander Multi-National Force (MNF) in Iraq for 19 months, and as Commander International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan for 12 months. He has also served as the Commander CENTCOM and as Director of the CIA from which post he resigned on November 9, 2012, citing an extramarital affair as the reason. In other words, he is an important general with a sterling career behind him.
Now, here, in abbreviated form with my own words in places, is part of a timeline put together by CNN’s Dana Ford, Phil Gast, Michael Pearson, Carol Cratty, wires and staff, on this affair. It would be interesting for Pakistanis to note that the domestic agency, the FBI, was the investigating agency that is responsible, not only for investigating the CIA chief (a former mighty General, note again) but for the final denouement too: “The affair came to light during an FBI investigation of a complaint that author Paula Broadwell, 40, was allegedly sending harassing e-mails to another woman close to Petraeus,” a US official said.
In 2006, Broadwell met General Petraeus when he spoke at Harvard, where she was a graduate student, according to the preface of the book she co-authored, All In: The Education of General David Petraeus. “She told the general about her research interests and he agreed to put her in touch with people studying the same issues.” In 2008, Broadwell began her PhD dissertation on Petraeus and his “innovative leadership skills”.
In June 2010, Petraeus replaced General Stanley McChrystal as the top commander in Afghanistan and Broadwell decided to turn her research into a book and follow Petraeus to that country. “‘We had a relationship before I went there as far as this dissertation was concerned, so it just took it to another level,” Broadwell told CNN’s Brooke Baldwin in February’.”
The affair started when Petraeus took over as Director of the CIA in October/November 2011. In May 2012, when unwanted and threatening e-mails were sent to a Petraeus family friend, Jill Kelley, she went to the FBI who traced the mails to Broadwell. These mails apparently had to do with Broadwell telling Kelley to mind her own business, so to say. The FBI gained access to Broadwell’s computer and examined it thoroughly and interviewed her several times.
Petraeus and Broadwell ended their affair in the summer of 2012, but because the FBI sleuths also came across e-mails from Petraeus to Broadwell, the Director of the CIA was interviewed by FBI agents too. In the meanwhile, “in October 2012, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was made aware of an extramarital affair involving Petraeus. Doug Heye, a spokesman for the congressman said Cantor, a Republican, was tipped to the information by an FBI employee. The Congressman had a conversation with the official, described as a whistle-blower, about the affair and potential national security concerns involved in the matter, he said.”
On November 6, 2012 , America re-elected President Barack Obama. The same day, Petraeus told Director of National Intelligence James Clapper about the affair who advised Petraeus to resign. On November 9, Petraeus, after getting the president’s go-ahead, stepped down.
The saga is by no means over: General John Allen, the present Commander ISAF, who took over from Petraeus (!), “is under investigation for “potentially inappropriate” e-mails with Jill Kelley, the woman who was allegedly harassed by Paula Broadwell, and who went to the FBI in the first instance. Curiouser and curiouser, when you consider that the Petraeuses and the Allens and the Kelleys and Jill Kelley’s sister, Natalie Khawam are old friends from when they were all together in Tampa, Florida.”
Be which as it may, and despite the fact that this scandal has been headline news on every channel/newspaper all over the world with all sorts of stories of the Kelley/Khawam sisters bankruptcy; the latter being described by a court thus: “appears to lack any appreciation or respect for the importance of honesty and integrity in her interactions with her family, employers, and others with whom she comes in contact,” etcetera, the CIA/US Army has not put the blame for any of this on to the Russians or the Chinese, even the Taliban! Neither have they called it a conspiracy by a traitorous press!
A general or two made the wrong call and faced the consequences like he should have done/will do, for I do think we are going to see more of the Allen affair. There is no hiding behind the sacredness of the uniform; behind the killed and the wounded of the US military; behind false and fake narratives of ‘Ghairat’ and other such nonsense.
Indeed, Piers Morgan asked the famous film director, the sterling Oliver Stone, just the other night on CNN if criticising/exposing a general during a time of war borders on treason. The answer was classic Oliver Stone and fits our situation down to the ground. No, said Stone, for the same was said about Rome’s Praetorian Guard until it was so bloated with Imperial largesse that it became more powerful than Caesar and began to make and break kings and the Senate and generally interfered in politics.
Incidentally, one week after Petraeus resigned and a day after the investigation into Allen’s matter began, Defence Secretary Leon Panetta stripped General William ‘Kip’ Ward, former Commander US Africa Command of a star “for lavish travel and other unauthorised expenses”… “which means that he will now retire as a three-star lieutenant general despite arguments from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff against the demotion. Ward also has been ordered to repay the government $82,000.” (Words in quotes courtesy the Washington Post).
Are you listening, our political leaders? For the time is NOW for you to gird your loins, please, and ensure civilian supremacy. No one will eat you up, as we natives say!
Published in The Express Tribune, November 16th, 2012.
COMMENTS (46)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Shafi Sahib,
Before you shed too many tears on the supposed sackcloth and ashes US generals wear, please read the excerpt below from an Washington Post article. All warmongers live a high life both while in uniform and after they retire. Our field marshals are no exception!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/petraeus-scandal-puts-four-star-general-lifestyle-under-scrutiny/2012/11/17/33a14f48-3043-11e2-a30e-5ca76eeec857_story.html?hpid=z1
"The commanders who lead the nation’s military services and those who oversee troops around the world enjoy an array of perquisites befitting a billionaire, including executive jets, palatial homes, drivers, security guards and aides to carry their bags, press their uniforms and track their schedules in 10-minute increments. Their food is prepared by gourmet chefs. If they want music with their dinner parties, their staff can summon a string quartet or a choir.
The elite regional commanders who preside over large swaths of the planet don’t have to settle for Gulfstream V jets. They each have a C-40, the military equivalent of a Boeing 737, some of which are configured with beds."
@Sultan:
@observer: Yes I do. Shall we drone them?
Can't be, as you do not have access to Drones,
How about blaming the Americans for General Rani and friends too.
@observer:
Yes I do. Shall we drone them?
@Arsalan Mujahid: And you need to go to grammar school to get acquainted with the use of articles.
Does any one remember General Rani and friends?
What nonsense. Every Pakistani general is worth at least at least a dozen Petrareuses. The fact that they have really done nothing other than safeguard our 'precious national ideology' is simply besides the point.
Mr Shafi is always critical of Uniformed Personnel - I hope there is no bad history or enmity he is carrying with military. I wish our politician to be so clean and strong to follow the suit. Instead of following American we can follow Hazrat Omer R.A. who removed a famous general right in the midst of a military campaign he was leading.
@ author You are proposing that people living in glass houses should hit the others with rocks. Iss sadagi pey kon na mar jai...
Only PML-N has the ability to tame the arrogant institutions.
@ishrat salim: @mahmood: I agree with you 100% sir. By hanging ZAB the generals proved beyond any doubt that they are the real powerhouse in Pakistan. The atrocities committed by the army officers in E. Pakistan cannot be due to one civilian or ZAB. Those were not the PPP workers but the Pakistani army and that is why the Bengali victims are still upset about the generals not the PPP workers. The army committed all atrocities due to ZAB. They stationed OBL due to ZAB, they stole elections because of PPP/ZAB, they repeatedly surrendered due to ZAB, threw 60 judges with their families in detention due to ZAB/PPP and the list goes on and on. Regards, M
@ozair mustafa: Is there anything else wrong with our nattion...Just Generals and Politicians ..and that also he writes under threats to his self and family .
He is confusing issue A with issue B. Not Didiactic, just diatractic.
@Parvez: hahaha. Good one. There lies the real issue.
@VINOD: because Clinton is elected to serve a specific term in office by the people and the generals are not. They serve at the pleasure of the elected leaders.
@VINOD: "But may I remind that President Clinton after worst extramarital affair in the white house survived and remained President in spite of huge uproar and inquiry. " Please read the article again. It is about the "civil supremacy" over the "military". It has nothing to do with sexual peccadillo. No one has any say about the personal decision of Gen. Petraeus to have an extramarital affair. It is when that affair impacts the national security that he must be asked to step aside. That is what he was advised to do and that is what he had the grace to do. Else, he would have been simply fired. Many American Presidents have had extramarital affairs, Washington, for instance. He was never called to the dock. An extramarital affair is just that. There are no good, better or "worst" extramarital affairs!
so Petreus has blood of 100s of thousands on his hand and that does nt matter for the US public and media? th affair is infinitely more important than so many human lives in mid east and afghanistan. Our generals dont have affairs, are complicit in all kinds of rogue activities and get away with them too. Looks like we are better than our masters in many respects.
@ishrat salim: Bhutto's real position in front of Generals Yahya and Ayub was that of a chapraasi. Meaning he served at their pleasure and they called all the shots. So let us blame the break up of Pakistan on the chapraasi, and not on absolute dictators whose every command was the last word in Pakistan from 1958 until December 20, 1971
I understand the article has the intentions right and has the interest of Pakistan in mind. But may I remind that President Clinton after worst extramarital affair in the white house survived and remained President in spite of huge uproar and inquiry. Why? Any answer from the writer ?
Hey wake up, this kind of "things" do not happen in Pakistan. Our generals are pious, straightforward and clean! They have just one goal, to serve the nation until they retire. This undying spirit to serve the nation makes them to demand extended term/s and nation generally obliges! So do not look for parallels here with the infidels!
@gp65: Certainly not PTI.
why you are expeled from Army!!!!!!! grapes are sour
@Mirza: surrender of half the country today known as BD, was possible only due to the disagreement of ZAB to allow Mujeeb ur Rahman of Awami league to become PM as they won with majority vote., forcing AL / Mujeeb to demand independence with support of all political parties & people of then EPak.Army action was done in consultation with all political parties in which PPP/ZAB played major role....let us be fair before pointing fingers at the Army alone for all the ills this country is facing today.All are aware but do not have the guts to face truth..that whenever Army came, came with the support of all political parties & the people, this is no secret.When ZAB was hanged...why PPP...claiming to be peoples support, could not arrange any rallies against Zia`s & SC action ? so, pls Mirza sb...let people learn truth instead of giving only one side story...kia aap ko Allah swt ko jawab nahi dena ? if you think what I said above is not true, refer to the archives of that period & dig out truth....
ET pls help for truth to prevail....some people are deliberately trying to distort truth, so for once let us swallow the bitter pill of truth....
Author has corectly highlighted the simplistic effectiveness of the US system but since he, in all his articles is a keen military basher, seems to have missed the trick once again.
Holding prejudices against individuals or institutions is one thing but propogating them to influence and corrupt the minds of others is rather inappropriate. Corruption at political or bureacratic levels is still corruption and simplistic solutions of Civillian supremacy will not solve our woes.
I will draw your attention towards what happened with the HEC, Ephedriene case, Hajj Scandal and then ask you to hold your hand to your heart and repeat your comments for Civillian Supremacy.
I wish we see the day when civillian Chief Executive is supreme but I feel NSC is the way forward at this time, to avoid resting of power with any single pillar of our state.
It's not a question ghairat. Remember the most Bacchanalian of army general and scion of liberalism and colonial values in the country, General Yahya Khan......He stayed put in his position despite overindulgence wine, women and global politics. Anyway Petraeus was not in the army any longer, he was retired and was head of the CIA. KS should therefore focus his attention on the (bay)gharait of our top civil servants.
This affair shows the strength of the system in USA where the high are investigated as easily as the low. Compare the resistance of our President, Prime Minister etc etc to any investigation that has to do with them or with their friends and family.
Patreus showed he was repectful of the law and resigned of his own free volition. Did you hear the praises showered on him by his President and his civilian chief Panetta.?
I wonder, how does his (Patreus) situation apply to our generals? Or is it that we have just taken up knuckles against our military leaders with the objective of finishing off the only well functioning institution of our **cked and mucked country? Would someone explain the lossses of public corporations such as PIA in the last five years? Would someone explain why it took more than three years to obey an order of the Supreme Court? Would someone explain why police and civil administration has collapsed in Karachi? And Balochistan?
Oh, it is all the doing of our military leaders!!!!
@Mahmood -
Mr Kamran Shafi is all to predictable, has one agenda it seems.Even though his point generally are correct but why his has single point agenda.Can he explain it.
Hardly i see his views on other issues.
KS article title can be further modified " A Generals TAMING..." instead will hit more on for a mind set to familiarize with such things.
I can see the pleasure in between the line.
Why are you so much against the Generalship of Armed Forces........................... :)
You need to go to Psychologist..... in my opinion.
Are you listening, our generals?
@Hammad: "Elections are coming, let’s elect the people who have some backbone, not just against the army, but also against Taliban."
Which party do you think fits the bill?
The Petraeus incident came at the right time for us Pakistanis, who were debating whether our Army can continue to be above the law, as it has been for more than half a century. The incident shows that rule of law applies equally to everyone in a progressive, democratic society - even a celebrated general with genuine achievements is not spared. Time to reform our system and strip the generals, brigadiers, colonels, majors and captains of their holy cow status. That is the requirement of both Islam and Democracy
Zinda Bad Kamran Shafi. I wanted to take it up but now that you have written, it is lock, stock and barrel as ever. Salute! Off goes my hat. By the way, I might have preffered a "stellar career" instead of "sterling career". Well then you are my commandar, my Chief
LIVE LONG and BLAZE on all guns
Do you think these political leaders in power care a hoot about civilian supremacy. Safeguard their corruption, ensure them more loot and plunder opportunities and they'll wag their tails to every general. Pakistan be damned for them. You need to keep army in check? Spend your energies and write articles to ensure these politicians (in power please, there's already too much of Imran Khan) get their acts together, provide people with basic necessities at least (it'll be too much to ask them for anything other than basics) and get the awaam behind you. There's no bigger deterrent to power usurper (army) than the support of your very own people who get you into power.
Don't expect anything from these politicians who ask the army before making any single move. They are in power only because of army's negative public opinion and the free press. Elections are coming, let's elect the people who have some backbone, not just against the army, but also against Taliban.
Amreekan General had no ghairat like our generals. He resigns!
Well written
@Maria: "Lazy, simplistic analysis. L’affaire Petraeus has NOTHING to do with civilian supremacy in Pakistan. " Well, if this "simplistic analysis" doesn't rise to your standards, how about Truman's firing of Gen. MacArthur for his shenanigans? Does that have anything to do with civilian supremacy? Could that have been the backdrop for Petraeus resignation? "Old soldiers never die, they just fade away"-MacArthur's address to US Congress. In Pakistan, generals get younger with age and live for ever in shining estates (paid for by the mango people) in Daaman-e-Koh!
A great Op Ed by KS, thanks ET for that. The three above mentioned generals not only have been shamed but are not going to be even trusted by the army and the govt. It also proved once again the supremacy of the constitution and civilian rule. The reason what the USA today is that it is not left to the generals but the elected leaders from the likes of Harvard and Yale. In the US a personal mistake can cost the war heroes dearly. On the other hand there is no accountability at all in Pakistan even after being in bed with the worst terrorists and surrendering half of the country.
Is it just me or 2003 to 2011 means 8 and not 10 years. Ex-servicemen should learn how to count.
And our generals!!-Abbottabad operation GHQ assault, mehran base, kamra base,salala,malala. All are there staying in queue to get Nashane Pakistan,Sitare jurat etc.Eastren values! (sahahin ka jahan aur hae kargas ka jahan aur)
US civilians are unpatriotic, they have no respect of sacrifices of their Generals! They should learn lessons from us!
Did author needed this scandal to see what is wrong with his own politicians. What effect his warning is going to have on the targeted politicos.
Excellent as always. Sir in the end you are calling upon mongooses to do the work of a tiger.
Lazy, simplistic analysis. L'affaire Petraeus has NOTHING to do with civilian supremacy in Pakistan. Stop trying to conflate the 2 issues - each situation has arisen due to the unique circumstances existing in each place.