It’s not cricket

The blatant abuse of power has only increased since the induction of the latest civilian government.


Mikail Lotia September 05, 2010
It’s not cricket

ZOOOOMMMMM!!! – that’s the sound of the cars that I see every day, whizzing down the wrong side of the road, and merrily charging through the red lights that foolishly try and stop their speedy progress.

For me, waiting at the red light or trying to drive down the correct side of the road, this is a frustrating experience to say the least. But what makes it truly aggravating is when the traffic offenders in question are aligned with the very people tasked with maintaining law and order in the first place.

Vehicles with green and blue licence plates blatantly breaking the law, flouting their tinted windows and oft-abused sirens and lights, have become an all too familiar site on the streets of our cities. And, frankly speaking, this kind of blatant abuse of power has only increased since the induction of the latest civilian government.

No wonder then that there is such a gaping ‘trust deficit‘ between the government and the people that they are meant to be serving. I know that this example of traffic violations is a small one, in the grand scheme of things, but it’s a very telling one as well. If our government is so contemptuous of us in such an open and brazen manner, what’s happening in secret, behind the closed doors? I shudder to think.

I don’t mean to condemn the entire body of the government. I’m sure that there are plenty of under-appreciated civil servants living up to their job titles. They work, mostly without thanks, at doing what they can with limited resources, poor pay, and a never ending parade of a de rigueur ruling elite that either don’t know what problems the common man is facing, or don’t care.

Unfortunately, there are lots of bad apples and the trust deficit has its roots in a very solid foundation of abuse and corruption. Where are our heroes? To whom do we look up to? What value does an award have when presented by someone nicknamed Mr Ten Per cent?

So you’ll excuse my scepticism after reading (http://tinyurl.com/37wtyom) that the government of Pakistan is considering a ‘flood tax’, to be tied to income tax, to raise the money it needs to finance the billions of dollars it will need for reconstruction efforts. This is a ludicrous idea from every angle and an insult to the tax-paying public.

Consider that the percentage of people whom are already paying their taxes is very, very small — conservatively below 10 per cent though realistically closer to three to five per cent.  It’s not a huge leap to assume that the people actually honest enough to pay their income tax are already doing their part in helping with flood relief efforts. To hit them with another tax hike, the funds of which will only end up in the murky underbelly of the government coffers, is unconscionable.

The floods that have hit Pakistan this year are a tragedy beyond imagination, and I feel for every family that has lost a loved one, their home, and probably both. If any good can come of this terrible situation, it’s if the people finally turn a searching eye onto their government and demand accountability from them. In fact it’s a necessity, because another disaster on this scale, with this level of mismanagement and petty feudalism, may be the straw that breaks the country’s back — if it isn’t broken already.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 5th, 2010.

COMMENTS (5)

Aliya Zaidi | 14 years ago | Reply Lovely article - I agree with you.
hakeem | 14 years ago | Reply Sir, i would differ as government means authority to make policies we can of course voice our reservations but not in a way that ostensibly suggests rebellion to those policies for instance if Govt can not collect Donations enough for rehabilitation of flood effectees then levy of tax is only substitute and if you are saying that Govt can reduce its operating expenses, primarily those mostly can not be liquidated as are exaggeratedly stated by counting man hours and traffic jams etc secondly it means compromise on security that is out of question. About hurls and humiliating waving of arms by security officials of Vip conveys in our society if they wont do it they cant manage as well described by dictator Musharraf "in west they need a warning tape to keep people away from a site but in our country people jump over the barbed cables placed to keep them away" in this situation what else is resort. Lastly we need to rationalize things and more focus shall be made on using what is available then what we miss.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ