I suppose the temptation to identify someone — especially someone who occupies a top political position — by his religious identity, is too high. After all, some years ago, hordes of foreigners used to marvel at the fact that India had a Sikh prime minister, a Roman Catholic head of the country’s largest party and a Muslim president — at the time, APJ Abdul Kalam. Oh, what a panoply of identities, they said!
But just look at the facts. Sonia Gandhi became the Congress party chief only because she married into the Nehru-Gandhi family and more or less inherited the job, although it is another matter that she has grown into it with considerable elan. Her religion was irrelevant. Similarly, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has never won an election in his life and was named to the position by Sonia in 2004, primarily because he was nobody’s man and could rise above party factionalism, and also because he was a man of integrity. The fact that Singh wears a turban did not influence her decision.
Admittedly, both Kalam and Pratibha Patil were chosen to become president for other reasons than plain politics — Patil, because she was a woman and the Congress party would be seen to be gender-friendly, and Kalam because it would look good on India’s CV if the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party government had a ‘Muslim missile scientist’ at the top.
The story goes that Mulayam Singh Yadav, an old-world politician from the north Indian cow belt who only speaks Hindi — also known by his sobriquet ‘Maulana Mulayam’ because of his staunch defence of the Muslim argument — once called Kalam to his office, when the latter was scientific adviser and he was the defence minister and began to talk to him in Hindi. Kalam was suitably mystified and had to tell his boss that while he was a Muslim, he was really the son of a poor fisherman and boat-owner from Rameshwaram in Tamil Nadu and he spoke no Hindi at all, just Tamil and English. Mulayam is said to have beaten a hasty retreat!
As for Khurshid, who comes from an old Congress family, the fact is that he is firmly grounded in the liberal school of Nehruvian politics, where egalitarianism is the touchstone of public life. He will restore to the Foreign Office a political sense that India wants to reach out, especially with its neighbourhood. In recent months, Khurshid has often said that he wants all South Asian countries to be a lot more integrated, that travelling to each other’s countries should not be as problematic as it is today, that the subcontinent must restore to itself the right to be far more cohesive, and that political differences cannot be allowed to come in the way of enhanced civilian discourse.
Is this a pipe dream? Will the Indian bureaucracy allow the loosening of frontiers to take place? Can India’s neighbouring states reassure it that they will not allow any India-directed terrorism from their soil thereby, taking away the Indian bureaucracy’s single largest excuse for disallowing greater contact?
The stain of Khurshid’s alleged corruption — as claimed by an Indian TV channel recently, whom Khurshid is promising to sue for crores of rupees for tarnishing his reputation — aside, he offers an alternative discourse that is courteous and puts people at the centre of the argument.
The Congress party has 18 months before elections are held in mid-2014. The latest cabinet reshuffle is an exercise in seeking to convince India that the party is still wedded to the idea of justice and public service. From now on, only the most creative ideas and their implementation will matter. Otherwise, as the Congress party well knows, it will fall by the wayside. And Khurshid, Prime Minister Singh and Sonia Gandhi with it, irrespective of what their religious affinities are.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 10th, 2012.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The author also forgot to mention that the new foreign minister was the defense lawyer for SIMI, a banned terror organisation.
The credit goes to Jawaher Lal Nehru and his colleague who gave India such a constitution which guarantees the fundamental rights of the people irrespective of their religion color and creed. That is why India can have a Muslim Presidents and Foreign Ministers.
So Jyoti, in line for some exclusives from SK? He was appointed keeping the 2014 elections in view and not for any special expertise on foreign affairs (yes, I know he was a Minister of State in the Ministry of External Affairs where, I gather, nobody paid any attention to him). @toticalling: "More Indians hate Muslims....". I'm not sure how to answer that. I have lived all over the world including the Middle East and did not hate Muslims. As a rule of thumb, the Muslims in the Maghreb, the Lebanese and the Syrians, the Iraqis and the Indonesians are very secular. Egyptians were but have become more religious of late. Nobody wears his religion on his sleeve like the South Asian Muslim, that might explain the comment you have made.
"......he offers an alternative discourse that is courteous and puts people at the centre of the argument."
Now, now, Ms Jyoti, don't start feeding hokum to your Pakistani readers. Isn't this the same gentleman who issued threats of blood and gore to Kejriwal and his merry men? And a number of Kejriwal's activists were roughed up too, in Salman's constiuemcy of Farukhabad, as if to underline that the threats were for real.
BTW far too many of your fellow Indians see the latest cabinet reshuffle as Sonia shuffling a pack of cards having only jokers in it.
As for Khurshid, who comes from an old Congress family, the fact is that he is firmly grounded in the liberal school of Nehruvian politics, where egalitarianism is the touchstone of public life you forgot to mention he holds a very soft corner in his heart for specially abled people......
Our Pakistani friends know all about nepotism, for like us , they see it in their polity...salman khurshid is been milking the charity funded by public money. Intact the question no one asked was...how come govt money was being channeled through a private trust whose " owners" are running for public office.....he is another rent seeker ...like many others in sub continent ..sucking blood from the society they claim to serve
and Kalam because it would look good on India’s CV if the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party government had a ‘Muslim missile scientist’ at the top.
I think I differ in what you said...Kalam's reputation was sky high during that time because of his involvement in Pokhran nuclear test...His books were read by the youth of India and he was an inspiration among school students...Besides,noone cared about his religion and he too never went around advertising the fact that he was a muslim
BJP just backed the popular person to the top post.There was no such "Token Muslim" in Indian politics like the "Token Black guy" in American movies...
I agree with the the author. But then saying it in a Pakistani paper is like shaming the neighbor. Rest assured we do not know the word shame in our vocabulary. Many say it is only at the top and the rest of the country still hates minorities, particularly Muslims in India. There is some truth in that too. More Indians hate Muslims than you can imagine, But that is not important. You cannot change people's mindset, but we must appreciate that active effort is made to allocate important jobs to Muslims. In Pakistan laws do not permit for a non Muslim to lead the country. We do not want all Pakistanis to have equal rights. There is no need to beat about the bush. That is the way it is, some things never change as one of the popular song says.
The Indian voters have every right to choose their leaders. If Congress falls by the wayside, as the writer likes to put it, as a result of the election, so be it. Congress has ruled India the longest but rotation of power is also a feature of democracy. A change of foreign minister within the same setup is also normal in a democracy. So let us not attach any great meaning to this change. Above all let us not expect any changes in India's foreign policy. It is good optics though and that is about it.
U are true Indian voice in this forum............unlike the others who seem to represent a particular appsement mentality......keep it up