India rejects Pataudi trophy for England Tests

India’s cricket chiefs turn down proposal to name trophy for upcoming Tests against England after Pataudi.


Afp November 07, 2012
India rejects Pataudi trophy for England Tests

NEW DELHI: India’s cricket chiefs have turned down a proposal to name the trophy for the upcoming Tests against England after former captain Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi, who died last year aged 70.

The Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), which owns the revered Lord’s ground in London, instituted the Pataudi Trophy in 2007 for the winner of India-England series in England.

The family of Pataudi, nicknamed “Tiger”, wrote to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) asking them to follow England’s lead.

But the BCCI on Wednesday said that the MCC’s Pataudi Trophy was meant only for the series played in England and it had its own prize to be awarded to the winner of the series in India.

The BCCI said in a statement that the upcoming four-Test series, which begins on November 15, will be played for the Anthony de Mello Trophy, named after a former board official.

“The India-England series in India is played for the Anthony De Mello Trophy instituted in 1951 in the name of the first secretary of the BCCI, recognising his contribution to Indian cricket,” the statement read.

Former captain Bishan Bedi, who played under Pataudi, slammed the BCCI for handling the matter “shabbily”.

“(I) played six series with England and not once was there mention of the De Mello Trophy,” Bedi tweeted.

Tiger Pataudi is often hailed as one of India’s most charismatic cricketers who played 46 Tests between 1961 and 1975.

A former “Nawab” or nobleman, his father, Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi was the only Test cricketer to play for both England and India.

Tiger Pataudi scored 2,793 runs with six centuries, including an unbeaten 203 against England in New Delhi in 1964, despite having lost his right eye in a road accident.

He led India in 40 of his 46 Tests, winning nine and securing the country’s first series win abroad on the 1967-68 tour of New Zealand.

COMMENTS (17)

Rakib | 12 years ago | Reply

@sid:

The trophy for series played in England is after Indian and that in India is after Englishman

(1)"Pataudi" means the Senior too, only one to have played both for England & India.(2) Anthony de Mello, like the great broadcaster of AIR Melville de Mello, was not an Englishman. He was born in Karachi in a community popularly known as "Anglo-Indian" but as the surname shows he was of Portuguese-Indian ancestry of Goa-Bombay.

@Deb;India You are right Sir. "Cement makers" indeed. Half the fellows don't know the difference between a cricket field & a field cricket (the insect) but they understand the "chirping" of money alright!

Ram Singh | 12 years ago | Reply

@USMAN786:

You had to, of course, bring in the Muslim element because logic and common sense are alien to most madrassah-educated Pakistanis. If the De Mello trophy was indeed named after Pataudi, you would still say that India denied De Mello the honour because he was a Christian. We are secular Indians whose large majority consists of Hindus, yet the country has seen a number of Muslim Presidents, a vice president, several ministers and many, many MPs. Pataudi was given many honours, including the privilege of captaining India's national cricket team - a fact that filled the Muslims of India with pride. India's Muslims do not see Pakistan as their "mother country", a myth that has been propagated by your mentally-bankrupt politicians, military and mullahs. Ask Indian Muslims what they can get in Pakistan. They will say that get a fancy title called "mohajir". Also, the head of India's ruling party is a Christian, not to mention a Sikh PM. Can you think of having anyone in a senior position (let alone a minister, prime minister or the president) belonging to a minority community? You might like to shoot him down and shower rose petals on the brutal killers. That's what your civilization is about.

If you -- or your ilk -- have any intellectual honesty, you would see how backward your country is in terms of social thinking and emancipation of minorities. Of course, India has huge problems but Indians don't blame other countries for their problems, a mantra which Pakistanis love to chant with deep religiosity. India has large pockets of poverty, I concede, but an Indian can breathe the free air unlike an average Pakistani who is judged by the religion to which he belongs to. You don't even recognize Ahmedis, Shias and the like as Muslims; they are denied all the fundamental rights which your terribly distorted constitution should guarantee. And, Mr. Usman, I am not even talking about the horrors of the sufferings of Hindus, Christians, Parsis, etc. who would run away from the "land of the pure" when any country provides an opening in the door. This is already happening with Hindus who come to visit India but don't ever want to return to Pakistan.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ