Plotters planned UK attack "bigger than 7/7"

Two of them are accused of receiving terrorism training in Pakistan.


Reuters October 22, 2012

LONDON: Three British men planned to carry out suicide bombings which could have been more devastating than the July 7, 2005 attacks in London, a court heard on Monday. Two of them are accused of receiving terrorism training in Pakistan.

Fifty-one people died and over 700 were injured in co-ordinated suicide bombings on London underground trains and a bus by four British citizens in the so-called 7/7 attacks.

Irfan Naseer - 31, Irfan Khalid and Ashik Ali, both 27, are accused of being central figures in the plot, jurors at Woolwich Crown Court were told.

"The police successfully disrupted a plan to commit an act or acts of terrorism on a scale potentially greater than the London bombings in July 2005 had it been allowed to run its course," said prosecutor Brian Altman.

"The defendants were proposing to detonate up to eight rucksack bombs in a suicide attack and/or to detonate bombs on timers in crowded areas in order to cause mass deaths and casualties.

"One of them even described a plan to cause another 9/11," he added.

All the men, from the city of Birmingham in central England, are accused of engaging in conduct in preparation of terrorist acts, which they deny.

Naseer is accused of five counts of the offence, Khalid four and Ali three, all between Christmas Day 2010 and September 2011. Nasser and Khalid are also accused of travelling to Pakistan for training.

COMMENTS (5)

LionOfPunjab | 11 years ago | Reply

Why these idiots have to go to west and live there? Please, let some us who live in west and try to help motherland financially and improve her image, be at peace!

Jaahil | 11 years ago | Reply

"Two of them are accused of receiving terrorism training in Pakistan." MaShaAllah, what a wonderful fortress of Islam Pakistan has become. Zia-ul-Haq 'Zinda Bad'.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ