Malala’s path to recovery

The TTP should be considered insurgents, not criminals and they need to be fought in the battlefield, not the courts.

Editorial October 20, 2012

After being shifted to the UK for treatment, 15-year-old Malala Yousufzai can now stand and write and appears to be on the path to recovery. Unfortunately, it appears her would-be assassins may end up living equally long lives. So far, a few arrests have been made but there is no indication that any of those apprehended were her shooters. The government cannot afford to treat this incident as a law-and-order issue. The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has declared war on the state and this was yet another salvo in a long battle. The TTP should be considered insurgents, not criminals and they need to be fought in the battlefield, not the courts.

The obvious next step would be to launch a military operation in North Waziristan, where the TTP and other militant groups like the Haqqani network are able to operate without impediment. The civilian government seems to have little power when it comes to matters that concern the military. The US has far more influence but even it has not been able to convince the military to launch an operation in North Waziristan. With winter approaching, any possible operation is now likely months away at best. The state has ceded authority, not just in North Waziristan, but in all parts of the country where the Taliban can potentially launch an attack. When the attempted murder of a minor schoolgirl is not enough to spur the military into action, then there is probably no crime so heinous that military force is the only possible response. Our lack of reaction will only embolden the Taliban.

Often, exhortations to launch an operation in North Waziristan are fended off by stating that most militant groups there have not made Pakistan the target of their nefarious designs. This, however, ignores the fact that they have been staging attacks inside our neighbouring countries and, hence, the reasoning not to deal with the sanctuaries is flawed. If we refuse to rein in militants targeting US/Nato forces, we should then be ready to face the consequences because the rest of the world will tell us that we need to sort out the militants in our own backyard. Either we act decisively and launch a military operation to minimise the menace of militancy or we should stop our criticisms of drone strikes, which aim to eliminate the very militants, who we refuse to target and who endanger Pakistan, too.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 21st, 2012.


PakShock | 8 years ago | Reply

People who don't believe in Taliban's Claimed shooting Malala after threats, then threatened of killing her again if she survive actually live in a dream/fantasy world. I tell you! They also believe that Osama is alive, WTC was an inside job, it's impossible for man to go in space, mars or moon, the aliens have landed, that political leaders from religious parties are truthful and pious, women in remote areas of Pakistan have excellent living conditions with full-rights, 15 Saudi Hijackers are still hiding some where in the desert, Taliban don't live on smuggling, kidnapping, robberies and murders, there are actually no problems in Balochistan, and that if you keep telling yourself and others ANYTHING over and over you start to believe it's real.

R2D2 | 8 years ago | Reply

@Romo: so if malala does not do well will that mean that God is on the side of Barbarians, please stop bringing god in everything and start doing things to make pakistan leave dark ages behind

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read