I confess I have been deeply affected by Ikram Sehgal’s memoir Escape from Oblivion: The Story of a Pakistani Prisoner of War in India (OUP 2012). He carried a binary identity — born of a Punjabi father and a Bengali mother — which held only as long as East and West Pakistan held together. What devastated me was how it was invalidated by both and Ikram was handed over to India as a prisoner of war (POW). Across time, he comes across as the only morally valid reference in the story of Pakistan.
Ikram got into the army in 1965 and was commissioned into 2E Bengal Regiment where he served till 1968 before qualifying as a pilot in army aviation. On March 25, 1971, the Pakistani military cracked down on Dhaka. Ikram reached Dhaka two days later to join Logistic Flight, Eastern Command, and was told he had been posted to Sri Lanka instead. The meaning of the second transfer was lost on him. He used his ‘joining time’ period to visit 2E Bengal near the Indian border.
But 2E Bengal was in revolt. They thought he was a Punjabi commando come to kill their commander. Ikram was handed over to the Indians who took him to a camp in Agartala where the Indian Border Security Force savagely tortured him. Soldier to the core, he now posed as a rebel to survive, causing his identity crisis to become an insoluble riddle. From Agartala he was finally moved to Panagarh in West Bengal, along with other Pakistani POWs. In 1947, his father, Captain (later Lt Col) Abdul Majeed Sehgal, was demobbed from the same Panagarh to Lahore and on to Sialkot.
Ikram spent 99 days in Indian custody but escaped on the 100th day, barefoot and naked except for his underwear, in a replay of the Great Escape film, which forms the purple patch of the book. He went to Calcutta — home of his maternal grandmother — in a truck driven by Biharis. He managed to walk half-naked into the US Consulate in the city, was given shelter because of the recent Henry Kissinger-Yahya Khan plot to facilitate President Richard Nixon’s visit to Beijing, but was asked to leave lest the Indians got wind of it. He was given Rs1,000 as his fare to wherever he wanted to go. He plumped for New Delhi. What the ISI officer did in the Pakistan High Commission reads like fiction but it really happened. Two commandos, fully armed — AK-47, three magazines, a pistol, and some grenades — took him on a circuitous route to Kathmandu in Nepal from where he took a flight to Rangoon, and finally to Bangkok, with the weapons as hand luggage! In Bangkok, the defence attaché was intellectually incapable of grasping his now-invalidated identity. Back in Dhaka, he spent 84 days under interrogation at the HQ Inter Services Screening Committee.
In November 1971, he rejoined the Pakistan Army and served in Thar and Balochistan “but was dismissed from service two years later without any reasons for this action”.
Ikram Sehgal’s mother was an Urdu-speaking Bengali from Midnapore near Calcutta. Husain Shaheed Suhrawardy and JA Rahim were his grandmother’s first cousins. On his father’s side, his late grandfather, Haji Abdul Karim Sehgal, partly built the Marine Drive of Bombay. His grand-uncle Shaikh Mohammad Abdullah served as chief engineer at the Bombay Baroda Central India Railways. Today, Ikram runs his security firms and has gone back to Bangladesh to rejoin the 2E Bengal as an old friend and he is still a Pakistan Army soldier to the marrow. But this is what he writes about 1971: “When soldiers make war on women and children, they cease to be soldiers. That is why in the final analysis, when it came to real combat, they could not face up to bullets which is their actual job as soldiers … the terror that was unleashed by them in East Pakistan between March and November 1971 is simply inexcusable.”
What should one do when two identities are in violent clash and you are stuck in the middle? Is reality acceptable only when it is framed in black and white?
Published in The Express Tribune, October 14th, 2012.
COMMENTS (18)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@LionOfPunjab: I disagree with Lion of Punjab. Please respect our Shaheed Jawaans they are giving there blood to save the country in which we are living
I dont know Ikram Sehgal. However, I have read his columns in another daily. He makes up facts and has a very narrow and biased view of history. I never thought his columns were truthful and were detestable. Can his book be any better ?
"Funnily, instead of funerals and other occasions of high emotion, I am moved by any show of discipline and restraint. I am touched by situations brought about by moments of moral relativism when it is difficult to deliver judgments." - Mr. Sehgal was part of an army that committed genocide on its own people. "Funnily" - and it is not funny, that neither rankles your morals nor moves your emotions. But his escapades do! It merely reinforces the impression - no matter how wrong, perhaps, that "good" Muslims never criticize their own. - Mr. Sehgal's bravado has never been verified idependently. Even Niazi wrote his memoirs exonerating himself of any wrongdoing! - The Pakistan High Commission was bringing in arms to India in diplomatic pouches at least as far back as 1971, now we know.
Guy is fake! I don't believe what he has written in his book.
@Ayesha Siddiqa:
".....This book is a waste because it tells a story from a person who normally lies"
Once the narration is from a very personal angle it can very well contain embellishment and lapses of memory in the "right situations." However, as a commentator, your statement is definitely very harsh, you could be totally justified in saying that. Can you please eleborate?
While I appreciate Khalid analysis of Mr Sehgal having a binary identity, I found the book to be quite dishonest. He never explain exactly why did he go back to his unit 2E Bengal in March 1971 a time when it was considered suicidal to do so as it was obvious that all 100 Bengali units are revolting. Also he has barely written a line as to what was the interrogation he faced all about. I think writing memoirs needs to much courage and most of our Generals write one after their 'conscience' forces them ten or fifteen years after retiring and after being part of some of the worst atrocities. And their memoirs are never honest or reveal anything new. Sorry I ampathise with Mr Sehgal for having to suffer because of his Bengali origins but he is at the end an extremely pro-army guy and hardly celebrates his Bengalis roots in the book.
Khalid: I am disappointed by this review article because Ikram Sehgal has always privately complained about the bias he suffered from in the army due to his maternal Bangali connections while taking huge benefits from the institution. This book is a waste because it tells a story from a person who normally lies.
"But this is what he writes about 1971: “When soldiers make war on women and children, they cease to be soldiers."
I can vouch for the accuracy of this statement. I saw it with my own eyes.
A. He carried a binary identity — born of a Punjabi father and a Bengali mother
B. he is still a Pakistan Army soldier to the marrow.
C. What should one do when two identities are in violent clash and you are stuck in the middle?
IF,
He is 'Pakistani Soldier to the Marrow' (Not a Bangladeshi Patriot or even sympathiser)
THEN,
Which 'Two Identities ate in Violent Clash'?
AND
Where is the question of 'Binary Identity'?
His birth to an ethnic Bengali mother is only incidental.
As an ex officer of western Railway(originally B.B.&C.I)it was intersting to read about Mr Abdullah,he was an XEN when deputed by the railways when sea was being reclaimed near churchgate station.At that time sea was next to the station.He was in charge of laying out Marine Drive on the reclaimed land.It was not the grandfather. skpande
Anythng that Mr Ikram Sehgal says, should be taken with a spoonful of salt.
a disturbing story. really.
Khalid Ahmed sahib, I have a lot of respect for you. But I HAVE to ask you about this. You say the following: But this is what he writes about 1971: “When soldiers make war on women and children, they cease to be soldiers. That is why in the final analysis, when it came to real combat, they could not face up to bullets which is their actual job as soldiers … the terror that was unleashed by them in East Pakistan between March and November 1971 is simply inexcusable.”
Well, I looked at Ammara Salman's review (Link in your article) here is what she says
"While Sehgal’s effort is commendable in that this subjective record endeavours to reconstruct the debate on the division of Pakistan in 1971, the right wing prism through which he carries it out is typically biased.
He strengthens the typical Pakistan Army discourse that India remains the perpetual archenemy and repeatedly condemns India’s interference in Pakistan’s affairs. But, on the other hand, there is no mention of the atrocities committed by our own forces in then East Pakistan.
I watched this interview of Ikram Sehgal by Moeed Pirzada http://sochtapakistan.com/escape-from-oblivion-an-exclusive-interview-with-ikram-sehgal-sochta-pakistan-10-august-2012/ Nowhere does he mention even ONCE about the atrocities committed by the Pakistani Army. Perhaps, it could be because of who he was talking to and the type of audience he was talking to.
Could you please explain this to me Sir? Thanks in advance.
“When soldiers make war on women and children, they cease to be soldiers. That is why in the final analysis, when it came to real combat, they could not face up to bullets which is their actual job as soldiers … the terror that was unleashed by them in East Pakistan between March and November 1971 is simply inexcusable.”
..for our current army it should be re-written as :
“When soldiers build business empires.. they cease to be soldiers. That is why in the final analysis, when it came to real combat with the talibans/terrorist, they could not face up to bullets which is their actual job as soldiers …and they just pay lip service as COAS kayani did after Malala incident...”
Good one, thanks Khaled sahib
His stay in Bangladesh can perhaps be counted in hours and then he was caught and sent to India. Is his decree on the 1971 situation credible? Sanity says no. Giving an opinion is one thing. Giving an analysis is an other. Self styled security experts are everywhere. Zaid Hamid is the poster child. He wrote a book as well. Funny thing is, he was in Afghan theatre just like Mr. Sehgal and this coincidence make them both 'experts'.
With all due respect sir, this man Ikram Sehgal was a deserter from Pakistani Army and joined the Bengalis. There was no 'escape' ever, NO prisoner of war ever remembers Ikram Seghal escaping from a POW camp. In contrast when Majors Raja Nadir Punjab and Tariq Pervaiz both from 6 Punjab actually dug a tunnel and escaped along with some other officers, it was news all across the POW camps as well as in every Indian television and radio broadcast.
Now if any of the readers want the intelligence reports on Ikram Sehgal I'd be glad to share. They have been making rounds on the internet as of late obviously released by the 'boys' to out the truth on Ikram Sehgal. For the documents email me at saad.duraiz@gmail.com