India's Vidya to compete with Pakistan's Humaima

Vidya was nominated for 'The Dirty Picture' and Humaima for 'Bol'.


Ians October 12, 2012
India's Vidya to compete with Pakistan's Humaima

NEW DELHI: Vidya Balan's dare bare show in The Dirty Picture has bagged her a nomination in the best actress category at the Asia Pacific Screen Awards (APSAs), for which Pakistani actress Humaima Mallick is also in competition for her role in Bol.

Vidya played southern sex siren Silk Smitha in the Ekta Kapoor produced movie, which won her accolades. Humaima essayed the part of a strong woman who combats patriarchal society in Bol.

They are competing alongside names like Korean actress Cho Min-soo (Pieta), Russian actress Darya Ekamasova (Once Upon a Time There Lived a Simple Woman) and Philippenes-based Nora Aunor (Thy Womb), according to the official APSA website.

India has other nominations too at the APSAs, scheduled in Brisbane Nov 23.

Acclaimed filmmaker Anurag Kashyap stands a chance to win the prize for achievement in direction for his crime thriller Gangs Of Wasseypur, and Manoj Bajpayee is nominated in the best actor category for the same movie.

The Children's Film Society of India's Gattu, about a nine-year-old street boy obsessed with flying kites, is nominated in the best children's feature film.

COMMENTS (27)

movie buff | 12 years ago | Reply

if anyone has any doubts about vidya's acting caliber, they should watch "Kahaani". mind boggling performance. Vidya showed her skin in "dirty picture" as the role demanded it. Vidya has versatility as an actor.

peace:) | 12 years ago | Reply

@Alapan

One time wonder Humaima malik does not stand a chance and should drop out from this contest gracefully.. this one time Humaima got a chance to be nominated for the Asia Pacific Screen Awards (APSAs)after her first movie, whereas vidya got this chance after acting for several movies.

need i say more :)

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ