Pakistan's Abdur Rehman banned for 3 months after failing dope test

Left-arm spin bowler Abdur Rehman failed a dope test during the English country season while playing for Somerset.


Afp October 03, 2012

LONDON: Pakistan and Somerset bowler Abdur Rehman has been suspended for 12 weeks after testing positive for cannabis, the England and Wales Cricket Board announced on Wednesday.

The 32-year-old spinner failed a drugs test on August 8, following the Country Championship game against Nottinghamshire and will now be out of action until December 21, meaning he will miss Champions League Twenty20 matches with Sialkot.

"Somerset County Cricket Club fully supports the action taken by the ECB," said Somerset chief executive Guy Lavender.

"The club does not condone the use of illegal drugs in any circumstances and all Somerset players are made fully aware of this policy on a regular basis."

Rehman took 19 wickets in three Test matches against England last January when Pakistan swept the series 3-0 in Dubai and has a career haul of 81 wickets at an average loss of 28.

"I apologise to my family, the PCB, the ECB, Somerset County Cricket Club, my team-mates and my fans," said a remorseful Rehman.

"It was an error of judgement on my part that will cost me dearly and I would like it to be a lesson to all others in sports elsewhere.

"I will do my best to stay fit and focused during my suspension, and God willing, will be available for selection for the India series should the Pakistan Cricket Board see it fit for me to be selected."

COMMENTS (24)

Pragmatist | 9 years ago | Reply

Shame....shame.....shame

pakistani | 9 years ago | Reply

Poor guy, who cares if he took a kash or two ... the whole world takes it, many in Pakistan do, what crap, England team binge drinks in clubs after their matches and abdul rehman gets banned for cannabis... On a slightly serious note, he should have been more careful

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read