The schoolteacher’s children were encouraged to converse in English and frequent the elegant school library. Narayan struggled to finish his degree and tried to work as a schoolteacher before he gave up everything else to become a novelist, writing solely in English. He became successful and built his own house in Yadavgiri, Mysore in 1953. He lived there until 1990, when he fell ill and had to move to Madras to stay with his daughter’s family. He died in 2001. When his legal heirs sought to demolish the Mysore home, fans and admirers of the writer urged the government to recognise his birth centenary and preserve the home as a heritage site. The Karnataka state government and local authorities at Mysore agreed and promised to buy the property from the heirs last September.
Incredibly, some eminent Kannada language writers are now protesting against the state’s gesture. They have many grouses against the late novelist, but almost all are related to his choice of the written language. In a joint press release and several media interviews, the protesting Kannada writers have mentioned grounds for denying the author the honour: RK Narayan is not a Kannadiga. He has not translated any Kannada work into English. He gave his manuscripts to an American university and received cash for it. He did not speak Kannada fluently. Therefore, RK Narayan is not entitled to a memorial in Mysore, which is in the linguistic state of Karnataka and the administration should desist from spending the taxpayers’ money on it.
The protesting clique, which has also shown hints of religious intolerance in other instances in the past, has been opposed by liberal intellectuals. To be fair, the state government itself, managed by a political establishment that is eminently capable of posturing for populist appeal, appears to be taken aback in this instance. This is more than a coalition of narrow minds. The outrageous logic of the protest barely hides a siege mentality founded on envy and fear about linguistic ‘others’, especially of English in urban spaces, which is in ignorance or denial of cultural realities. Among the 30 most-spoken languages in the world, 11 are Indian.
Bangalore, the capital city of Karnataka, which has been India’s fastest growing city for two decades, is an obvious arena of such conflicts. It is a city preferred by India’s young to earn well and move up. They come here from everywhere, but don’t really organise themselves into linguistic communities for political or cultural advantage. Bangalore continues to be expressed culturally, for the most part, in Kannada. For instance, it is a major centre of rock music and many big international groups give their first Indian performance here at the Palace Grounds. Deep Purple was surprised to find 40,000 screaming fans when it performed there for the first time in 2001. Other musical acts too — Pink Floyd, Jethro Tull, Bryan Adams or Metallica — had their fans, but the numbers are in the range of 20,000 to 40,000. But on April 23, 2005, when the late C Ashwath, a composer and singer of light music, tentatively planned a performance at the same venue, the timid organisers made arrangements for 10,000 people. This was indeed ambitious for a Kannada singer, they believed, but 100,000 fans turned up. Still, Kannada activists sulked because English-language media ignored the event. But the point is that the English-language media here is small and often marginal to the context. The most read Kannada language daily, Vijaya Karnataka, has a readership that is more than double of all the English language dailies combined in the state. Only one English language daily figures in India’s top 10, the rest of the list comprising Hindi and regional language papers. Hindi and regional language channels take most of television, with English news struggling to reach even one per cent of the 150 million TV homes of the country. India can have English and it can have all the other languages too. If India can own its own Mahatma Gandhi Road, it could easily and proudly own RK Narayan, too.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 28th, 2012.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Dr Mishra, thanks for your kind words agree with you but Pakistani dramas are known around the world even by Indians as being well written and entertaining too. I know alot of Indians overseas in Australia and Canada who watch them and enjoy them
@Srinivas '....some intellectual kannada writers(Girish Karnad is one such slave) are up in arms to preserve a english author’s house. This shows what the Britishers have left with us – slavery!! It is in our blood now.'
R K Narayanan was not an 'english author'; he was an Indian writer who wrote in english. However he, as an 'english author' (as you say it) and Girish Karnad as his designated slave are in an illustrious company with, among others, M K Gandhi - Hind Swaraj J L Nehru - The Discovery of India; Glimpses of World History B R Ambedkar - Castes in India; The Buddha and His Dharmma
@Rajesh: , @Srinivas, @abhi
You all make some good points. If RK Narayanan's family wanted to create a museum no one would have objected. Yje expectation is that the state should buy his home from the family at market value to create the museum. So tax payers are well placed to ask the question why him and not someone else.
Prakash, since you feel so strongly about this, why do you not organize a fund raiser to be able to purchase the building at market price and preserve it? Given all your supporting data that local newspapers and entertainment sell more than English language entertainment, what is the rationale for not preserving the Karanth residence at tax payer dollars but preserving R K Narayanan's? This seems to be more of an apple to apple comparison rather than comparison to Mahatma Gandhi which came out of the blue and had no relevance to rest of the article.
No folks, seriously. Some of us just don't get it.
When the Hindi-Urdu* belt tried to impose Hindi-Urdu on South India in 1960's, they booted it right out of the ball park. Linguistic imposition was never ever tried in India again, and never will be. Indian subcontinent has a pluralistic history even though there is strong cultural unity across the entire subcontinet. But, now every one understands that any thing not pluralistic will never fly in India.
Some of the south indian languages are really old and people are really proud of it. Tamil for instance has a literature from 400 B.C, and only Sanskrit is older. And, as a linguistic scholar, ancient Tamil is my best source for Roman history of the subcontinent. And, of course, these languages are the living link to the original languages of the Indus Valley and cousins of Brahui still native to Pakistan (though there are some scholars who disagree here).
When the same Hindi-Urdu belt tried to do exactly the same thing in Pakistan, we had a totally opposite reaction. Instead defending the beauty of Sindhi and Punjabi, ancient languages in their own right, we just rolled over and played dead.
That is because we are blinded by religious fanaticism and ignored our ethnicity, pluralism, and culture.
Humaira
*Hindi-Urdu same language according to most reputed linguists (including myself), though different dialects.
I don't think any one is against RK Narayan, but the point is that he is getting VIP treatment only because he wrote in english, which as per your own claim is spoken and understoop by few (elite) people. Other equaly good writers in regional language do not get such treatment.
Also, what the whole media and rulers in K'taka and India ignored is the demolition of a great Kannada writer's house - Kota Shivarama Karanth. His house was demolished overnight in the name of building road. He is such a great personality that he was termed as mobile science dictioneray. He lived for more than 90 yrs and greatly contributed to Indian culture and science and his works were all in Kannada. He established Yakshagana academi and gave several performances in India and abroad. He is such a great contributor that he can be considered for Bharat Ratna. All these our K'taka govt ignored and the media didn't even report the demolition of his house. No protests were reported for known reasons. Now , this great govt and media and some intellectual kannada writers(Girish Karnad is one such slave) are up in arms to preserve a english author's house. This shows what the Britishers have left with us - slavery!! It is in our blood now.
Humaira
Are you not doing what you are complaining about? Instead of counting the blessings of being a Pakistani you are envying a country full of hate for innocent Pakistanis?
The opposition expressed by kannada writers is not against setting up the memorial for RKN but pumping crores of rupees from the local govt taxpayers money for the same. Their ire is RKN's own relatives are not interested in preserving their ancestral home and have not shown any inclination either to part away with the building. Of course, they've demanded money - purely in business terms for selling it to the govt. If that is the reality, why then should that building be preserved at all? It doesn't have any emotional connect with either the locals or the kannadigas whose tax payer money will be spent for the upkeep of the building. Just imagine how difficult it would be to maintain that building if there is no local support. The same cannot be said of the many heritage structures in the city which have some sort of emotional connection with the local populace.
@Humaira
As per your definition Punjabi, Seraiki, Pushto, Sindhi are also Indian language because 65 years back there was no Pakistan and these languages were there.
Officially Only KP have discarded Pushto and adopted Urdu otherwise Sindhi,Punjabi and Saraiki are well treated in Pakistan.
Dr Mishra bro tamil film and telgu film industry is ahead than bollywood in some aspect .i am not southi but i love hindi dub south indian film and specially dance .
40,000 people came for Deep Purple? How sad is that? A has been group of geriatric rockers.
The opposite holds for our own Pakistan in every respect!!
We ditched our languages - Punjabi, Seraiki, Pushto, Sindhi - and instead promoted an Indian language Urdu which is native only to the immigrant Mohajirs from India.
Not too different from how we booted out our own local culture, supplanting it with a fake Arab identity instead.
Hmmm...what makes us so different, if we used to be the same people 65 years ago?
Pakistan can learn from these facts. Even Kannada or Kerala or Tamil film industries are larger than Pakistan's.
There should be more emphasis on music, literature and dance in Pakistan, rather than this bizarre obsession with religion, India and Kashmir which is taking Pakistan to its doom.
Peace to all in Pak
"If India can own its own Mahatma Gandhi Road, it could easily and proudly own RK Narayan, too." Sir, India loves and owns her son R K Narayan. He is well respected in every part of the country. There would be hardly any Indian who has not heard/ read Malgudi Days (even in the remotest parts of country)!! He was an amazing novelist and should be celebrated as one of the greatest son India ever produced. His memories must be preserved as a national heritage site and it will always inspire the new generations.
A lot of facts. Unclear how the conclusion 'India can proudly own R K Narayan too' derives from the set of facts provided. In any case it was not India that was failing to own RK Narayana but a group of Kannadga authors?