My reasoning was that those of a violent deportment or of a religious bent of mind would be prevented from leaving their homes by their mothers and sisters, wives and fathers for the reason that they would get into trouble on what would surely be a volatile day.
In addition, the holiday would keep cars and buses and taxis and other vehicular traffic off the roads: more targets to burn and destroy given the mood of our mobs that we know so well, specially in matters spiritual. In the event, I am conflicted because of the near-unanimous feeling that the act of giving a day off was actually responsible for the mayhem that we saw: by, as everyone and Charlie’s aunt is saying, giving it an official stamp of approval.
But let’s look at this another way: whilst it is the easiest thing in the world to shovel all of the blame on to the holiday announced by the federal government, we must remember that the prime minister — whether you consider the man a puppet; even a stooge — said loudly and often during his speech to commemorate the day that the protest must be peaceful to impress upon the world that Pakistani Muslims were not mindless, angry robots, but a people with warm hearts and no rancour for anyone. And that they were merely protesting the hurt they felt.
Whilst it is the easiest thing in the world to shovel all of the blame onto the federal and provincial governments for the mayhem and the looting, has anyone stopped to ask if the imams whose sermons the faithful had heard just before launching themselves on to the streets of their own country to hurt and loot their own people, had counselled restraint? I fear not, for knowing our maulvi hazraat rather well, I can bet their sermons were loaded with incendiary language meant to enrage people.
Let me here and now state for the record that as far as I am concerned, whenever blasphemous cartoons or films or writings are published I ignore them completely as the work of demented minds who would deliberately denigrate someone else’s faith. In fact, when the play ‘Corpus Christi’ depicting Jesus Christ and his disciples as homosexuals was staged in New York, I, a Muslim, was upset. Not that I am a homophobe, but only because it upset some believing Christians.
A whole lot of them were very angry and upset too: some going to court to have the play banned, only to have their pleas turned down in very short order, in the name of freedom of expression, which too grated on my good sense of respect for all religions that I was taught as a very young boy growing up in my grandmother’s loving home.
But the point is that not one car was torched in New York, or in London, or in Rome; not one shop looted; not one bank or ATM vandalised. No one even threw a rock at anyone. Going back to what happened in Pakistan, did any of the leaders of the processions say to the participants to remain calm and orderly, if for nothing else, then for the sake of our Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself, who was a large-hearted and big man; who, when one day the woman who threw garbage on him as he passed her house did not appear on her balcony, stopped and asked if she was well. Did even one of Their Holinesses give this message to their flock?
I fear not. And what was the result? Pakistan once more showed its increasingly ugly and contorted face to the rest of the world. By actions such as the shameless burning of a church in Mardan, a church belonging to people who, too, believe in the God we believe in, our Christian brothers and sisters, who, too, were protesting the blasphemous film. Not only that, the frenzied mob even looted Christian homes near the church. Whilst incredibly disgraceful these acts were, there were others that should put us to deep, deep shame.
An article in this newspaper spoke of a horrific experience of a first-time pregnant young lady and her terrified husband on their way to her regular check-up with her gynaecologist because she also has a blood pressure problem. A mob of about a hundred hooligans began to hit their car with fists and sticks as they were crossing the Murree Road, Rawalpindi. Was this the way to protest an act of blasphemy: by endangering the lives of a mother and unborn child? Is this our respect for women? Bloody beasts!
How heart-rending it was to see people breaking little single-shutter shops in Peshawar, surely belonging to very small, poor shopkeepers, and looting them. How distressing it was to see an old and emaciated-looking police sub-inspector shot in the side of his chest in Karachi. Bloody beasts! But as every dark cloud has a silver lining, how very heartening it was to see his comrades bravely rushing to his aid whilst firing back at their attackers. I hope they will duly be awarded for their courage and sense of duty.
I have to end by reminding my readers that most of the hooligans and thugs despoiling our streets that day were not out for any altruistic, high reason if you went by the images that were being beamed on to our TV screens: they were out to have a little fun; loot a little; set fire to other people’s property; generally have a shindig.
Give up jihad gentlemen; otherwise, you will sink this blessed country. Give up jihad immediately if not sooner lest it sweeps you and your fancy DHAs too, with it.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 28th, 2012.
COMMENTS (60)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Observer. "Ok. So,if India,and specially Hindus, were to launch a war against ‘forced conversion’ of underage Hindu girls, and Pakistan gets involved, it will be Jihad proper? Now, the question. Which side will ‘Muslims’ fight on. The forcefully converters or the forcefully converted?" No it wouldn't be jihad either.In first place it's the duty of state,for that matter muslim Pakistan,to give protection to minorities and stop this ugly practice of forced conversion (if any) and bring the culprits to justice. So if India attack Pakistan on that pretext it would be helping converts (if requested by converts) It wouldn't be called holy war but just normal war and indian muslims are bound to abide the laws of the state. Reason is forced conversion is not allowed by Quran as it clearly states that their is no compulsion in religion (deen).Deen embraced through fear of death or for some worldly benefits means hypocricy and quran doesn't accept hypocrites. My personel observation is now a days there are no war fought on the basis of religion but on politicle basis the term jihad is abused just to motivate people.
@sabi: Jihad is a war against forced conversion, that too between to states.
OK. So,if India,and specially Hindus, were to launch a war against 'forced conversion' of underage Hindu girls, and Pakistan gets involved, it will be Jihad proper? Now, the question. Which side will 'Muslims' fight on. The forcefully converters or the forcefully converted?
@football: Dr Afridi, sent to 33 years in prison for treason, would really appreciate the proverb coined by you!
@Lala Gee:
Fighting over epistemological issues while your house is on fire, is not good policy.But, suffice it to say, Give up whatever thingy you are doing, irrespective of the name attached.
Happy?
@mahakaalchakra: No, I am NOT Bill Maher of HBO.
To set the record straight, I am from LAX and SFO, usually shuttling. Lived two doors next to Bill, but not anymore. He would annoy most of us with logic and that is what is good about him.
I am also fan of Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Pink, Hasb-e-Haal and "Sochta Pakistan", TOI, CNN, WSJ, FP etc.. Gives me an hour of enjoyment, and some vague sense of contribution :-)
Recently started reading ET and saw the place worth commenting, with objective observations. Nothing too pointed to annoy like Bill. (or Bill O'Riley,Cyrus Broacha or Azizzi...)
Hopefully, someone reading my comments with simple examples will see the light, and spread it . It only takes a few to lead.
I wish well for Pakistan, for my selfish reasons. A Pakistan further delusional will definitely harm herself. But none of shall be immune in the long term.
..pc (Politically correct) and ..Peace
gp65, Thanks a lot for your kindness and understanding of my view points.I say my view points the way I feel it.ET forum has given me a great oppurtunity to express my feelings and at the same time a chance to broaden my knowledge by exchange of views.I may differ with authors and fellow readers but I have no hatred for anyone.We are all humans and humans make mistakes.My purpose is to fight against widespread jihalat which has palagued this part of the world.And as Mirza writes 'Jihad against jihalat or returning mati ka qarz'. Thanks and wish you a healthy life.
It was a bad idea for the government to make this such a big deal by declaring a holiday. That sure provided added fire to the mindless extremists to kill, burn and destroy. The best thing would have been to issue an official condemnation.
People in government are daily accused of loot and plunder as are these rioters now. What a sad state of affairs.
disagree politically on many issues with the author, but cannot help but agree. our population has become increasingly right wing in its intolerance, but at the same time left wing liberal in our social behavior. the middle ground advocated in our religion has been lost, displaced by an idealogy completely foreign to the actual religion.
@gp65: Well, Muslims don't ask for a special status to be conferred on them. You can say whatever you may feel like in terms of political and social matters but attacking anybody's faith has no connection with the freedom of speech, dare I say. More than 75 percent of the world also do not accept other religions so that doesn't mean we create an atmosphere of hate against each other by abusing one another's faiths.
@Murthy: "As an atheist, I often wonder whether faith should be a source of hatred and violence?"
People withe hatred will find reasons t hate. Hitler was not motivated by Christianity. Stalin and Mao's deeds clearly cannot be laid to the door of any religion and the massacre of BEngalis in 1971 MArch was also by their co-religionists and not in the name of religion.
Whether it is religion or patriotism, any idea which cannot be questioned will be used by cynical people to manipulate people and gain power. The solution to hatred therefore is neither to embrace a specifc religion OR atheism. The solution is a spirit of inquiry where any idea is not above questioning - no matter who gets offended in the process. This questioing spirit is not just necessary for avoiding horrendous massacres but also for progress in science, medicine and much else.
you said:"But the point is that not one car was torched in New York, or in London, or in Rome; not one shop looted; not one bank or ATM vandalised. No one even threw a rock at anyone" excuse me ! didn't you remember the london riots of last year ? what about the occupy movement and their "clashes" ? please don't tell us how civilized these western beasts are,the looters of sub-continet !
@It Is (still) Economy Stupid: "Does it mean, in your understanding, (a) actions against Ahmadi (constitutionally called non Muslim) is Jihad? (b) Killing of Shia (poor cousin) is Jihad? (c) and forced conversion is your entitlement? Shame on your school who filled all kind of hate in you. "
I have been reading sabi's posts and while I do not always agree with his viewpoint, his heart is in the right place and he is not hate filled. All the examples you provided would not qualify as jihad per sabi because the fight was not initiated by the other party. In fact per his definition, not a single war with India could be called a jihad, since India did not start any of the wars. Even the Afghan war could not be termed as a jihad per his definition because though Soviet union started the war, it had never declared the intention of converting the Afghans or changing their faith.
It Is (still) Economy Stupid @sabi: “It only called jihad when an enemy(non Muslim) wage a war on muslim country with an open announcement of changing their (Muslims) faiths.” Thanks for calling all non Muslim enemy (enemy(non Muslim)). So what happened in Spain Jihad was called and you lost? Does it mean, in your understanding, (a) actions against Ahmadi (constitutionally called non Muslim) is Jihad? (b) Killing of Shia (poor cousin) is Jihad? (c) and forced conversion is your entitlement? Shame on your school who filled all kind of hate in you". You read my comment with some preconcieved notions and quickly jumped into draw stupid conclusions.I advise you to keep all kinds of prejudices and hate aside before you make judgements.Read my comments again with open mind and a little commen sense and you will get the answers. To further elaborate my point that jihad is a defensive war against forced conversion and that too between two states.And if forced conversion is an act of some groups with in a state then it is the duty of the state to stop these groups with force to keep law and order.
As an atheist, I often wonder whether faith should be a source of hatred and violence? If so, its practitioners need to reform themselves, because, I believe, the ultimate purpose of faith is to refine a human being. One can achieve refinement without faith with sheer reasoning power. But, it is imperative on the part of men of faith to achieve the same with the help of their religion.
@Anonymous: I do not think I said anything about Islam other than the fact that 75% of the world do not accept it and hence to demand a special status for it is unreasonable. The rest of what you said - an opinion you are certainly free to express- has no bearing on anything I said. Hence, I am unclear why it was addressed to me.
@Anonymous:
It took (most) Christians more than 1900 years not to take the Holy Bible anymore literally and to focus on the message of love as told in the New Testament and forget all the murderous parts of the Old Testament. Any time I quote verses of the Holy Quran which are similar in meaning to (some verses) in the Old Testament my comments are not posted. No one wants to hear them because these verses are not so "peaceful" but they are the ones used by those fanatics with their retaliatory thinking (eye for an eye) with whom you disagree. So you are definitely ahead of the crowd, but many are far behind (including the mostly American Christian Taliban), that is why you see here time and time again references to the Stone Age or Dark Ages. But a public discussion in the Muslim world is not (yet) possible (too many sensitive people). But frankly that is the only way forward. Surely, I have no hope that the Sabi's and Lala Gees's of this world will change their mind (long live Jihad). That group may need another 500 years to understand (as the Christians did). As an atheist I have only time on earth and that time is as we all know very limited by any standard, I would like to make the best of it in peace together with all my fellow human beings (irrespective of creed etc.).
Muslims long for Salahuddin, I think they need an Ataturk first.
Dear Mr Shafi
I don't know if ET will publish this comment. I would like to make a suggestion about protesting. Would it not have been better, if the govt. had organized on that day a mass Durood Sharif Zikar in every city. A most peaceful way to protest, to show our real love for our Prophet and to spread good energy and barkat in the country. This peaceful method would also have taken the political space back from the extremists and shown the world a much better face of our faith, a face which is actually more prevalent than the nasty extreme face.
Its time we, moderate Muslims took back this space.
Ali
Great article shafi sb. i think it should be translated and printed in urdu and other langugae papers in Pakistan.
marvellous.
You have exactly pinpointed-at the end-that the mother of all our ills is jihad waged by obscuantists with vested political interests. The illigimate jihad has resulted in killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent muslims and has destablized every country where this political tool was and/or being used. It has nothing to do with Islam but a convenient tool for mullahs to get to the citidal of power. Had it been a genuine jihad many of our devout and pious leaders like Munnawar Hasan, Samiul haq, Fazlur Rehman and hundreds of others would have opted for Shahadat which everyone of them, we are led to believe aspire from the core of their heart. Sir you have underestimated the apocalyps that is staring us in the eyes. It is not the DHA that is at stake. At stake is every civilized institution, army, constitution and even Pakistan itself.
@sabi: "It only called jihad when an enemy(non Muslim) wage a war on muslim country with an open announcement of changing their (Muslims) faiths." Thanks for calling all non Muslim enemy (enemy(non Muslim)). So what happened in Spain Jihad was called and you lost? Does it mean, in your understanding, (a) actions against Ahmadi (constitutionally called non Muslim) is Jihad? (b) Killing of Shia (poor cousin) is Jihad? (c) and forced conversion is your entitlement? Shame on your school who filled all kind of hate in you.
I must say, a very spirited, farsighted and sensible article, Mr. Shafi! You couldn’t have put pen to paper better. We have ceded ourselves to the demented ideology and there is nothing much that can be done about us. Loved the word “Bloody Beasts”!!!
''Truth is treason in the Empire of lies''
@mahakaalchakra: Bill Maher is from L.A and not from San Francisco.
And @Nadia Zafar: You are so right. Urdu press and Urdu tv are full of hate!
@Lala Gee: If instead of using the term 'give up jihad' he had said give up misuse of jihad', would you then be OK with it?
@mahakaalchakra: yes. I too was wondering and ditto.
Mr Shafi, We cut off our nose when we demanded a separate homeland running with the two nation theory. That bigger India became two nations in 1947 and then three in 1971. Unless we wake up and arrest the power of mullahs and agencies, we will be approaching five or more quite soon !
Give up jihad! No need to capitalize its first letter too. It has lost its meaning, and worth too. We will be better off in its absence. Replace it with 'educate'.
@Nadia Zafar: Ms Nadia,you are 100% correct. I wrote to many Pakistani authors exhorting them to get their good ideas in Urdu newspapers to reach the people at grassroot level. They say there are many Englidh-speaking guys who need to be improved!
@Bill Maher (SFO):
Hey Bill, are you in fact Bill Maher, the TV commentator. I am a huuuuuge fan of you. Your posts are very interesting and to the point.
@Not of your tribe: No double standards in US. They DO NOT have any holocaustdenial laws. Mocking all belief systems is permissible in US and the ouathor has given an example of a play where Christian beliefs were mocked. Other communities (Christians, atheists, Hindus, Jews) do not respond with violence when their symbols of reverrence are mocked. So it is not the cartoons/movies.
Therefore it is not the inherent action which generats the violence but rather the reaction from a religion that calls themselevs religion of peace.
The sense of entitlement that while all other religions can be mocked Islam should be spared has no basis. Any attempt to emforce your religious sentiments on 75% of the world who do not share your faith by threatening violence is unikely to be successful.
Lala Gee "Jihad is a divine commandment which you or I cannot over-rule, though I admit that currently what ever is being done in the name of Jihad has nothing to do with it." True I agree with that but every war is not jihad.It only called jihad when an enemy(non muslim) wage a war on muslim country with an open announcement of changing their (Muslims) faiths.
Vandalising to demostrate a peace - loving belief is like copulating to uphold virginity.
@Not of your tribe: Please give us examples of the "double standards" that you say exist in America! While you are at it, tell us all about the persecution of all non-Muslims in Pakistan, which is lately looking like the world leader of "double standards"!
@Lala Gee:` I admit that currently what ever is being done in the name of Jihad has nothing to do with it´ But that is the only kind of jihad the world has ever got to witness in our times.
Bloody Beasts indeed! Lord of the Flies coming to reality. We Pakistanis should be ashamed of ourselves...unfortunately very few are left amongst us who still have the moral clarity to distiguish between destruction and creation, between cruetly and compassion, between prejudice and tolerance, between corruption and decency....
Wake up or face the wrath of your Creator!
Sir you and your views are outnumbered by 99%. There is no easy fix until people wake up which will never happen. A loose loose situation.
good article!!
Sir, you're right. At first everybody appreciated PM's decision of announcing a holiday on Friday because we thought by doing this the PM had taken wind out of bearded sails. But alas! decency is not our cup of tea and we proved PM wrong. This reminds of Louisa May Alcot's famous quote:
"When women (in our case our PM) are the advisers, the lords of creation don't take the advice till they have persuaded themselves that it is just what they intended to do; then they act upon it, and if it succeeds, they give the weaker vessel half the credit of it; if it fails, they generously give her the whole."
We call ourselves the followers of that Great Man (peace be upon him) who used to make announcements even at the time of full fledged war that no property, no trees, no places of worship were damaged and no weaklings, no woman was hurt by the way of aggression.
It is not that the freedom of speech is unbridled when it comes to racism or Holocaust but abusing prophets and religions constitutes no offence in otherwise relatively religious-leaning America. I think more than the freedom of speech it is the business of selling hate that should be the cause of concern for the consumer nation of America. Can they allow markets to be flooded with traders who thrive on selling hate? Americans are a nation who also believe in standardisation of the businesses and everything. Why do then they allow double standards to prevail in their fair society? This is a question that they can't find answers to. Thanks.
You are a brave, honest man who writes from his heart, kudos to you sir.
Very good article!!
"But the point is that not one car was torched in New York, or in London, or in Rome; not one shop looted; not one bank or ATM vandalized. No one even threw a rock at anyone. Going back to what happened in Pakistan, did any of the leaders of the processions say to the participants to remain calm and orderly"
This may be because unlike the latter country the former countries were not formed on the philosophy of "Direct Action (Day)".........
These are just the symptoms not the the disease itself... The doctor has given the very effective medicine , hope the patient completes the course and gets well soon. The best thing is this medicine will eradicate the migraine of the neighboring countries as well....
"Give up jihad gentlemen; otherwise, you will sink this blessed country. Give up jihad immediately if not sooner lest it sweeps you and your fancy DHAs too, with it."
Not one of your best efforts, looks like it was written in a hurry.
it is not a question of giving up Jihad Sir. It is a question of understanding the true meaning of the word and its essence. The Maulvi Hazraat you rightly pointed out, can never even dream of enlightening the masses as they themselves are a product of a narrow minded society. Yes, we are a very narrow minded society, is something we need to accept; the first step towards improving our 'ugly and contorted face'. No matter how many articles you write here in an english newspaper, the print media has to realise that the urdu 'junk' newspapers (including some of the bigger names like Jang) are not only 'responsible' for selling extremist trash to an already bigoted,Holier-than-thou society, but they are 'Guilty' of the said crime. And if this continues, Sir, i am afraid that no one will be spared. The Ahmadis have been witness to this ugliness for many many years, now the Shias have joined the drama, and very soon the rest of the actors will all be playing the tune of horrors. Urdu articles from known Analysts will probably be a good step. My only fear is, that perhaps it is already too late.
Truth is treason in the empire of lies
Kamran Shafi, If we had not learnt the lesson from past behaviour of extremists this great tamasha,on friday, which infact was an insult to Islam in general and and Pakistan in particular, should be an eye opener for the nation.Mullah will never let anyone in peace.He knows the language of force and it is most needed now.Sooner the better. Regards.
Bravo, Shafisahab! Another gem from your pen!
Truth is treason in the empire of lies.
@ Author: A great attempt to rationalize, what happened on that dark Friday. Good read.
BTW: Corpus Christi is not the best insult to Christianity, pls include "Life of Brian" in your quotable quotes dictionary.
I think I would have happened anyway, weather govt gave a holiday or not. Pls remember that someone blamed someone for blasphemy for not participating in the protest on the day before, I have been told. Reasons are all very clear to us and we don't talk about it.
Lack of education, knowledge, tolerance... I could go on.
Author and ExpTrb : Thanks for trying to educate. pls make sure you syndicate and publish elsewhere. ..pv
Instead of going to court - like the Christians - and living with its decision, Islamic people resort to violence - on others and themselves. The most innocuous questioning of their basic beliefs is met with physical violence and threats. Why such insecurities? What is worrisome and becoming clear to the rest of the world is that this is not a fringe - "minority" - sentiment. Violence is a justified instrument unleashed by leaders and gladly indulged in by the masses. Your Rail Minister announced $100,000 reward for the killing of the makers of the film. There is no meaningful condemnation of his actions by people in the Muslim world. In addition, while you claim a lot for yourself in terms of respect, you are not willing to provide the same to your non-Muslim citizens. Why can you not protest against the hatred in your text books and mosques - it is taught every day. That would be the right jihad.
@Author:
"Give up jihad gentlemen; otherwise, you will sink this blessed country. Give up jihad immediately if not sooner lest it sweeps you and your fancy DHAs too, with it."
Perhaps for the first time ever, I thought I would be in complete agreement with your write-up until I hit the last para. Jihad is a divine commandment which you or I cannot over-rule, though I admit that currently what ever is being done in the name of Jihad has nothing to do with it.
Again on his one itm agenda,ET favourite columnist Mr.Shafi ,blaming Pak army for all the illsin our society.Just wanted to know whose is sponsering his crusade ,sure it's not ET