Blasphemous film

Our hate material does not place us on moral ground to convince the world to take action against those who insult us.


Rasul Bakhsh Rais September 26, 2012
Blasphemous film

The cowboy logic is very simple and has been known for ages; if you cannot beat them, join them. This is what the Government of Pakistan has done in closing down the country and announcing that the major ruling party, the PPP, will join the protest marches against the blasphemous video, produced by a small group of Christian extremists in Los Angeles. Those who have seen and written about the video Innocence of Muslims abroad, say it is stupid, sacrilegious, offensive and in our vocabulary, blasphemous. This is not the first episode of its kind; in our memory, it started with the publication of The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie, then the Danish cartoons, and then more such material began to flow out.

Offensive as these acts are, they are defended by the freedom of expression argument, which is tradition and political culture in Western democracies. Their own leaders, prophets and religions have not escaped caricature abuse or what might constitute insult. The governments, media and society don’t even take notice of such productions. They ignore such writers, producers and abusers, terming them ‘nuts’. Nor does the general public care about the ‘nuts’. Some of them may buy and read or watch such material and laugh it over. Let us be clear, the West has a culture of tolerance, freedom of expression and celebration of creativity, even when it crosses some established cultural norms. Government actions there are constrained by law.

Those of us who understand a bit of American or European intellectual tradition know well that deviation from common social standards is becoming a norm more than an exception. Its justification lies in personal, individual choices and freedom of expression. The conservative sections of society there lament about it but cannot do much to curtail individual freedoms.

Attacks on Islam and the demonising of Muslim culture and society by some extremist groups exploit freedom of expression. However, these acts are planned and they deliberately seek to provoke Muslims. We have reacted the way they wanted us to react by burning down and killing ourselves. Sadly, a French magazine followed suit by publishing insulting cartoons and selling all copies within 24 hours — only adding more fuel to the fire. We have the right to protest against the production of abusive material. But shutting down the government and every public and private institution is not the right way. Governments can protest by issuing statements or writing letters to foreign governments over such matters and provide designated space to the public for protest.

In our case, protests are too many, by too many factions, on too many issues, and on too many days. Pakistan has adopted a culture of protest as marches on the street happen all year round, on one issue or another. On all streets, cities towns and space from the mosques to markets, the protesters consider it their right to march through. While doing so, they burn and destroy public and private property. They come prepared with sticks, stones and in some cities, firearm.

Hardly any protest continues without some violence. With an overplay of emotions, reason on leave, and the fanatics loose, we cannot know how to protest and influence world opinion on such an important issue like blasphemy. Our Muslim majority’s own hate material against Jews, Hindus, Christians and even our minority Muslim sects also goes without any check. This does not place us on any moral high ground to convince the world to take action against those who insult us.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 27th, 2012.

COMMENTS (39)

R2D2 | 12 years ago | Reply

@Mustaqeem Talish: why you are showing your ignorance , there is no such law about holocaust and there will never be one in the US as that will not comply with the constitution that provides each individual to express his thoughts without being afraid of the govt. When you have spineless leaders like Obama they may try to appease you by arresting the movie maker from another angle , but in the US there can never be a blasphemy law

mav | 12 years ago | Reply

@numbersnumbers:

His name is Tareq Mehanna. There are many other cases coming out as well where speech favorable to terrorists is being severely curtailed under the auspices of the material support statute. The starting point of this tend can be traced back to Holder v. Humanitarian Law project. But definitely check out the mehanna case. Also read Virginia v Black where they disallowed cross burning because it was being done with the intention of provoking conservative Christians. When u start reading their case law u begin to understand how empty this rhetoric of absolute freedom of speech( with which they constantly beat muslims) is. They make exceptions all the time for things to which they are historically sensitive, but to others they say 'we have freedom of speech, it's a beautiful thing, why don't u understand, u should adopt it as well, or at least get used to its exercise in the free countries of this world'.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ