Law Minister Farooq H Naek resubmitted the draft of the letter to be written to Swiss authorities to the Supreme Court today.
A five-member bench headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa started hearing the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) case in the Supreme Court.
The law minister requested the judges for discussing the draft in the court’s chambers, upon which Justice Asif Saeed Khosa enquired whether the amendments had been made in the draft as yet.
Naek yet again requested for the draft to be discussed in the chambers which was then agreed upon by the bench.
The draft was discussed in the chambers by the judges who later summoned Naek and government’s counsel Waseem Sajjad into the chamber.
After ending consultation on the draft, the hearing was adjourned till 12pm.
In the previous hearing, after Supreme Court raised few objections over the draft of the letter to be written to the Swiss authorities, Naek – in consultation with government’s counsel Waseem Sajjad and Attorney General Irfan Qadir – made changes in the letter.
On threats and secrets
Speaking to the media after the hearing was adjourned, Naek said that since he was not the final authority on the matter, he needed to consult with Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf and that was why he had requested the court for more time.
“They were very gracious and kind, and they gave me time till October 5 for any consultation that I need to do, for any advice I need to take and then, complete the letter and bring it so that this matter can end,” said the law minister.
He said that in order for the country to progress, all pillars of the state needed to have harmony and should avoid clashes so that the country can “move forward on the path of progress”.
Naek dispelled rumors of behind-closed-doors threats and said that there were no secrets, adding that it was a pressure-free decision taken by the court.
“There is no bone of contention and all their observations will be taken into consideration while resolving this matter,” he said, adding: “You will see that this will end peacefully because implementation of the court’s verdict is everyone’s duty.”
On how democracy and national security had been threatened by this matter, Naek said that everyone was aware of certain forces that wanted to derail democracy by misusing this case.
Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira told the media that summoning respondents to the chambers was a routine matter as people to be consulted need to be taken into confidence.
“This is not about trust or mistrust; it is a legal situation which requires consulting others,” he said.
The letter saga began when the Supreme Court struck down the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), under which a number of cases against political figures were dropped – including the Swiss cases against President Zardari and his family.
Once the NRO was scrapped, the government was ordered by the court to retract the Qayyum letter written to Swiss authorities – something the government seemed adamant not to do, until it surprisingly relented last week.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The PCO judges might need extensions! Time to extract some more extensions.
Justice is for sale in Pakistan, both as a noun and as an adjective.
@Enlightened: @Asad: Vienna,September 26,2012 Sirs, Just for moment; do not ignore the fact, the legal profession obeys the law only as an exception not as the rule.I point out as the negotiations were on elsewhere in another court premises lawyers were engaged in thrashing a law enforcement official. Such events, what is more hounding out the media professionals or worshiping a open self proclaimed murderer with rose petals by lawyers has been witnessed only to prove the status of Pakistani judicial administration. It may be sad but reflects the society as a whole.There is no way for common man but to live with it since he is willing part of the society. Tarvadu Taranga Trust for Media Monitoring TTTMM India --Kulamarva Balakrishna
SC is wasting nations time president is there for the last 04-years. When they gonna decide?
Enlightened, please don't mention "military." They own Pakistan, and are,therefore, not to be equated with ordinary Joe.
The fairness of judiciary in Pakistan is highly questionable. Whereas it has removed the former Pak PM on contempt charges and proceeding with the same charges against the present one but it did not press the contempt charges against the top military brass in missing persons case despite military flouting judiciary orders a number of times.
This is new style of justice. The government and judiciary are negotiating. Who knows whether negotiations are only regarding letter draft or wide ranging? Governments are political and can be expected to negotiate. Courts are a different matter. Unfortunately, you can expect everything from judiciary under Iftikhar Chaudhry except justice. Under him, justice will neither be done nor seem to be done.
This is new style of justice. The government and judiciary are negotiating. Who knows whether negotiations are only regarding letter draft or wide ranging? Governments are political and can be expected to negotiate. Courts are a different matter. Unfortunately, you can expect everything from judiciary under Iftikhar Chaudhry except justice. Under him, justice will neither be done nor seem to be done.
So, as expected Law Minister is showing his dirty tricks and SC is playing to his tunes!!!!!!!!!!!!! What was the need to give more time when in last hearing the SC made it clear that time for consultations is over?
It is not the time given infact the time was asked, by end September the case is Swiss courts will be time barred and secondly new elections would be called for. To write and to send the letter will be at the discretion of the new govt. Zardari will go Scot free with money in his coffers, the SC will look like an wet eagle unable to either fly or to kill. The entire plan has worked well but at the same time has given others a cue how to hood wink the justice system in Pakistan which is already so cumbersome and costly but if you have the guts and the money you can follow such pathetic practice. Now the SC or even the lower courts have a precedence set and cannot be changed any good lawyer will shred the rule of law if his client can afford the price.
Negotiated Justice!