Cindy Lee Garcia, who appeared in the "Innocence of Muslims," filed a lawsuit last week in a state court in Los Angeles against Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the California man thought to be behind the movie, claiming she was duped into playing a role and her life has been put at risk as a result.
Her case also named YouTube and its parent company, Google Inc., as defendants for their role in distributing the short, crudely made film on the Internet. A California state court judge on Thursday rejected her motion for an order for YouTube to pull the film off its site.
"Today we will dismiss the state court lawsuit, but we're going to file again today in federal court," Garcia's lawyer, Cris Armenta, said on NBC's "Today" show.
"My client has a copyright claim," she said. "We intend to enforce it."
Garcia's is the first-known civil lawsuit connected to the video that depicts the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) as in negative light.
Armenta asserted that third-party content distributors hold some responsibility for the content on their platforms.
"I think we should be very clear that Google and YouTube are doing the wrong thing, that they say in their own terms and guidelines that hate speech is not allowed," Armenta said. "How can this not be hate speech? How can this not be wrong, morally intellectually, legally?"
Google previously rejected a request by the White House to reconsider its decision to keep the clips on YouTube, but the company has blocked the trailer in certain Muslim countries such as Egypt and Libya. The White House had asked Google to evaluate whether the video violated YouTube's terms of service.
In her lawsuit, Garcia, of Bakersfield, California, accused a producer of the movie, whom she identified as Nakoula using the alias Sam Bacile, of duping her into appearing in a "hateful" film that she had been led to believe was a simple desert adventure movie.
The film helped generate a torrent of violence across the Muslim world during the anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and in the following days.
The violence included an attack on US diplomatic facilities in Benghazi in which the US ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were killed. US and other foreign embassies were also stormed by furious Muslims in cities in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
On Friday, 15 people were killed during protests in Pakistan, and over the weekend a Pakistan government minister offered $100,000 to anyone who kills the movie's maker.
For many Muslims, any depiction of the prophet is blasphemous. Caricatures deemed insulting have provoked protests and drawn condemnation from officials, preachers, ordinary Muslims and many Christians.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Abdullah: spot on!
Absolutely - it should be pulled down. Remember that in 2005, a French court had banned a clothing advert mocking Jesus Christ -- see http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4337031.stm and please do not forget the recent ban on pictures of Kate Middleton and the reverence of the royal families of UK and Thailand.
@dasmir: @Tahir: Plots of films are not generally disclosed even to the actors in a film for commercial and/or any other reasons. Unless she has signed an agreement to the effect that the final product would not be released without her o.k, she is most likely to lose the case. That her life has been put in danger is not enough ground for any claim. I would suggest that you don't raise your hopes as, in all probability they would come crashing down by the final judicial ruling. Even US Supreme Court dare not rule against "freedom of speech/expression" in the US. It is not a kangaroo court of India which is routinely forced to consider Muslim appeasement as a valid ground for abrogation of fundamental rights of citizens! Besides, how can anyone know if blasphemy has been committed in private? Genuine respect has to be earned rather than commanded. It is clear Islam is not respected universally! In the erstwhile Soviet Union, people "voted" by taking pages of local papers like "Pravda" and "Izvestia" with long winded speeches of Communist officials to their toilets and used them as tissue paper!
This is the right way.There are million Pakistan American in America and they would have lodged similar legal action rather than pushing self destruct button.Every religious party and political party have US branch.Why no one did that?