Designation by the State Department as a Foreign Terrorist Organization would bring sanctions such as criminal penalties for anyone providing material support to the group and seizure of any assets in the United States.
The administration was facing a congressional deadline this weekend.
The New York Times said senior officials who argued against blacklisting the group were concerned it could further damage relations with Pakistan and possibly jeopardize the fate of US Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl who is being held by the militants.
But State Department and military officials who argued for the designation believed it would help curtail the group’s fund-raising activities in countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and pressure Pakistan to act against the militants, the newspaper said.
“This shows that we are using everything we can to put the squeeze on these guys,” one administration official involved in the process told the New York Times on condition of anonymity. The newspaper said four administration officials late Thursday said the government was going ahead with the designation.
Asked for comment on the New York Times story, a senior State Department official said: “As she noted earlier this week, the Secretary expects to send her report on the Haqqani network to Congress today, September 7, and announce her decision regarding designation of the Haqqani network.”
The al Qaeda-linked Haqqani network has been blamed by US officials for some of the worst recent attacks in Afghanistan, including attacks on the US Embassy in Kabul and on US troops.
The United States accuses Pakistan’s intelligence agency of supporting the Haqqani network and using it as a proxy in Afghanistan to gain leverage against the growing influence of its arch-rival India in the country.
Pakistan denies the allegations.
Kabul backs terror blacklist for Haqqanis: Spokesman
The Afghan government said it would fully support a US decision to blacklist the Haqqani network as a terrorist group, saying it would deal a crushing blow to insurgents seeking to bring down its administration.
Afghan officials have repeatedly joined their American counterparts in urging Pakistan to do more to eliminate the faction, as both Kabul and Islamabad trade blame for the violence plaguing both their countries.
“It will be a big move in destroying terrorists and their supporters, because the Haqqani network is the most dangerous terrorist group,” interior ministry spokesman Sediq Sediqqi told AFP.
He predicted that a terrorist designation would “dismantle” the Haqqani faction and deal a major blow to its allies in the Taliban, which leads the insurgency against the Western-backed Kabul government.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@ Ninja
The Haqqanis are not part of the Taliban, they were opportunistic enough to join the Taliban when they saw the Taliban steamroll into Kabul back in 1996. The Taliban are from the greater Kandahar areas of Helmand, Oruzgan, Zabul and Kandahar and the Haqqanis are based in Khost, Paktia and Paktika in southeastern Afghanistan. The two groups don't share the same worldviews and their political views don't converge.
Pashtuns from Kandahar have been the traditional leaders of Afghanistan, especially the Durrani confederation of Pashtuns, which leaves the Ghilzai confederation of Pashtuns from southeastern Afghanistan as their subordinates.
This is how the tribal confederation works in Afghanistan and Hamid Karzai is the president of Afghanistan because he is from the Durrani clan of Pashtuns from Kandahar, which has been the seat of power brokers since Ahmad Abdali formed Afghanistan in 1747.
The Haqqanis are a terror organization without a political wing unlike the Taliban of Kandahar and as such their affiliations with terror networks make them a threat to the region and this is why they should be designated as a terrorist organization.
This should surprise no one. It's an election year so the bureaucratic concerns about offending Pakistan will take a back seat to the concerns of the American public.
Haqqani are part of Afghan Taliban so why don't they declare all of Afghan Taliban movement as terrorists? this seems more like a cheap attempt to put pressure on Pakistan.
"accused" Since 911 we have been hearing US has accused but we never saw any proof. On the basis of these accusations millions of people have been killed
GOOD NEWS Better late than never I hope more to follow
One may dare ask, how this would help US, other than pleasing India lobby and Indophiles at the state and pentagon? It look like US has learnt no lessons at all in this war. You cant solve problems by blowing off everything from the face of the earth or blacklisting organisations/people as terrorists. Now one thing is clear that there will be no negotiated settlement in Afghanistan.
Our relations with the US should not be analyzed emotionally. We should establish a world view based on economics. That where the wellbeing of the people rests.
@Ayesha: I can understand your feelings.
Better late than sorry. Hope US administration has a deck of cards for these groups, in Pakistan, just like the one they have for Al-Queda. In that case one down 51 to go.
Uffff.....Grow up USA & leave all of us alone...
Why the US administration dithered for weeks, months and years is the moot question. Hope this move tightens the screws on the terror networks and their supporters who have terrorized the people of the regions with their atrocities.
Why don't they use Google Maps? The right one barbarian's finger and face expression does not reconcile. Does It?
I hope our relations with US sink to a level where that can't ever be revived. We need to understand the difference between having good relations and master slave relationship. Our's unfortunately have always been the latter. Bin Laden, Afghan Mujahideen, Haqqanis and all sorts of people who are now labelled evil have fought America's war for saving humanity not so long ago. They were uncle sam's brave heroes then.
there we GO! a new addition to army's "do more" list...
A very good step though a bit late!!!