Arsalan Iftikhar case: Asma questions Suddle’s appointment

Suggests inviting Scotland Yard to probe matter.

Our Correspondent September 04, 2012
Arsalan Iftikhar case: Asma questions Suddle’s appointment


Leading human rights lawyer Asma Jahangir on Monday raised questions about the role of the Supreme Court regarding Dr Arsalan Iftikhar’s case.

Asma, a former president of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), also suggested inviting a Scotland Yard (metonym for the headquarters of the Metropolitan Police Service of London) team to probe the case if the country’s institutions were not deemed trustworthy by the judiciary.

Talking to reporters at the Lahore High Court premises, Asma alleged the court was not meeting the requirements of delivering justice in the case against Arsalan in the Bahria Town scandal. She also rejected the appointment of Federal Tax Ombudsman Dr Mohammad Shoaib Suddle, the officer tasked by the apex court to investigate the case, after it barred the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) from investigating the matter.  She alleged that the apex court wanted to influence the investigations, as Suddle is said to have close links with Arsalan.

“The Supreme Court should ask the Scotland Yard to conduct the investigation into Arsalan Iftikhar’s case, if it has no confidence in the national institutions,” she said. Asma pointed out that Suddle also regularly accompanied Arsalan at various events. Therefore, he could not be expected to conduct a transparent investigation into the case.

Asma said Arsalan should, however, be given the benefit of the doubt. But she also reiterated that everyone should be treated equally under the law.

Criticising the court, she said if there were any questions over the NAB’s investigation team, then it could have been changed instead of forming a new inquiry team.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 4th, 2012.


Abdul Waheed | 11 years ago | Reply

Asma is right. One person who is a close friend of Iftikhar Ch and Arsalan should not be preferred over a state institution i.e NAB which has legal authority to investigate financial crimes. This case has brought bad name to the credibility of judiciary. The pillar of the state is losing its credibility only due to corruption of one person and judiciary is bent upon to protect him at any cost.

sunny | 11 years ago | Reply

Asma is right.....SC is giving favor to Arsalan iftikhar.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ